HAPPY BIRTHDAY to me. Mind you, I never thought I'd be spending part of my 76th composing this pish for my adoring public. Any way, since this is a fallow week in the Guinness Six Nations, it is maybe a good time to reflect on where we are, where we could have been, and where we might end up.
There is, to me any way, a strange look to the 6N table – with England right on our tails and above France in the standings. I know the French occasionally hit a mental wall when they go to Twickenham, but, surely, this year they will end their long run of disappointment there. They beat us, we beat England, therefore, France should also win on the Cabbage Patch.
The other game when hostilities resume, is now a definite Wooden Spoon Decider, and, with home advantage and the Welsh in total disarray, I fancy an Italian win.
But, before then, we have Round 15 of the BKT United Rugby Championship to get out of the way. I fancy Glasgow Warriors to get back to winning ways when they face Zebre at Scotstoun on Friday night. It will be interesting, however, to see what formation Franco Smith sends out, this will depend on who gets released by Scotland.
Edinburgh face a much-tougher task in hosting Leinster at the DAM Health Stadium on Saturday. Even before Mike Blair announced he would be standing down as their coach, I fancied this one would be damage limitation for the capital outfit.
It will be interesting to see who gets the Edinburgh gig, also, where Blair goes next. I would like to think there was a Scottish coach ready to step-up and replace Mike, but, I cannot honestly think of a potential home-grown candidate, which has to be yet another failure of the SRU management model.
A WEE BBC-style Interlude.
I have never been a fan of sports writers awarding marks out of ten for a performance in a game. First of all, that's an opinion and opinions are like erse-holes, we've all got one.
I remember working on one paper, where the Editor wanted marks out of ten to be awarded in games involving the local senior football team, coverage of which was my main priority at the time. Reluctantly, I obeyed orders, but, it was funny to see how these marks were viewed, particularly by the players being marked.
One or two used to get chippy if they didn't get at least a seven. One particularly under-performing striker once queried why I had only given him a five for one performance. “Because the Editor will not allow me to give fewer marks,” was not perhaps the response he was looking for.
On another occasion, the Club Chairman took issue with me, because I gave Man of the Match and 9/10 to a centre half who, to be fair to him, was quite happy to be described as: “The donkey's donkey.”
Mr Chairman felt the award should have gone to the sweeper and Club Captain and was not at all placated when I told him, the 'donkey's' nine was the equivalent of the seven I had given the sweeper – he got at least that every week, but, in this particular game, the 'donkey' had exceeded expectations.
Well, I get the impression the fact several journalists only gave Finn Russell 7/10 in Paris on Sunday should be tempered with the knowledge – a 7/10 from Finn is the equivalent of 9/10 for the other Scottish players.
I KNOW and appreciate the game of Rugby Union has a long and proud history, but, really, more than 25 years into Open Rugby, which has given us, an elite-level game where entertaining the paying public has become a priority, it is past time that we tweaked the Laws of the Game to reflect this reality.
I have been beating this drum for years, but, the sound of my distant drumming has not yet reached the leafier suburbs of Dublin, natural habitat of the guys who run the game – more's the pity. I again repeat the call I have been making regularly since I started this blog – it's past time we had a root and branch reform of the laws.
A couple of friends of the blog have been in touch, since Sunday, with particular reference to the two red cards brandished in Paris in the France v Scotland match. Under the present interpretation of the law on contact to the head, and the lengths the game's custodians are going to attempt to cut-out high hits, both red cards were justified.
However, given the circumstances of Grant Gilchrist's red – where the tackle, a split second before, of Matt Fagerson, dunted the French player into Gilchrist – a yellow card to either, or even both Scottish players might have been a more-fitting sanction.
The later red card for the French tight-head was another matter. His challenge was stupid, reckless and a definite red. Mind you, he perhaps needs lessons in the correct application of what is known as: “A Glesca Kiss,” his one of Ben White was as poor a case of “Pittin the heid oan somebody” as I have seen – but, in spite of poor technique, still a clear red.
One of my blog contacts yesterday made the fair point – the game perhaps needs to look at separating “technical” offences – the Fagerson/Gilchrist incident, where the problem is poor technique, and “foul play” offences – which is what the French red card was.
Technical offences would then be punishable by the non-offending side getting a free kick. Although, I would be willing to consider a Basketball-style law, whereby, after a set number of such offences – each subsequent offence is punishable with a penalty, which can be kicked at goal.
I again repeat my long-held support for Alan Hosie's suggestion, made many years ago, whereby serious foul play (i.e. an offence which merits a sending off) should be punishable by a penalty, to be, regardless of where on the park the incident happened, taken from a penalty spot in the middle of the offending side's 22 metre line.
There is also, I feel, a case for making individual players responsible for their behaviour. Thus, a red card becomes a “full game penalty,” the player is out of the game, but, he can be replaced and a disciplinary tribunal then decides if expulsion from the game was sufficient punishment, or if further game suspensions should follow. Red card – off goes the player; ten minutes later – he is replaced.
Regardless of the above, we really have to lower the tackle height and, as a matter of urgency, World Rugby needs to sort this out – if not before the Rugby World Cup, then certainly to take effect immediately after it.



