I HAVE only ever attended one Scottish Rugby Union Annual General Meeting. This was so long ago, it was held in the old North British Hotel and the only reason I was there was no other member of my club's committee was prepared to travel from Ayrshire to Edinburgh.
I would describe the ambience as being reminiscent of the old Brooklands motor racing circuit advertisement: “The right crowd and no crowding”. I sat beside the late Glen Stirling at the back, we old-school journalists knew our place. I felt, you had to have won at least ten caps to be called to speak – the great Hughie McLeod of Hawick, for instance, was grovellingly invited to give the assembly the benefit of his wisdom. The Rugby Establishment was very much in charge.
Fast forward 50 years, and not a lot has changed; “The Blazers” (although the corporate uniform is now a blue sports jacket rather than a blazer) still call the shots and the whole edifice is still choreographed to an extent which the likes of Lionel Blair, Flick Colby and Arlene Phillips would admire. It's not like your normal rugby club agm, where the Third XV, assuming your club still runs one, can draw lots before hand to decide which forward is going to, under “Any Other Business” ask why the committee put five pence on the price of a pint.
So, for all wee Rob Robertson's scream of agony in Scottish Rugby News this week, I don't think the fact the agm has now gone on-line will make a great deal of difference. It will, however, moving forward, see The Juntaconvening and congratulating each other on how they managed to pull it off again so easily.
The game, internationally, nationally and at club level is in a mess and I am afraid, I don't see the talent being around to halt the progress of the game's hull, heading Titanic-like for the iceberg. That iceberg may well be the looming class action from former professionals with long-term neurological damage.
{I have seen a theory that the damage to the great ship was actually caused by “a heating” in the coal storage area, which weakened the hull to the extent that the rip became greater once it hit the iceberg. The CVC “investment” may yet prove to be that heating.]
Like the Titanic, I feel the good ship SRU will prove difficult to slow down or steer away from danger, maybe Alex Williamson will prove to be a better skipper than the last “Captain Smith” (although, to be fair to the good Captain Smith – he went down with his ship rather than float off on a nearly £1 million life boat).
The trouble is, so-many of the Ship's Officers who navigated it into treacherous waters are still in the ward room. We don't yet know who all is being thrown overboard, but, I fear one or two of the “officer class” who ought to have been forced at cutlas point, to walk the plank, will still be enjoying G&Ts in the ward room for a cruise or two to come.
And while I am on this course. I bear no personal ill-will towards new Vice President Hazel Swankie, who I have always been led to believe is one of the better elected officials inside the Murrayfield bubble.
However, given the Union's precarious financial position and the controversy around the finances and the nice big fat severance payment cheque which That Cunt Dodson trousered as he left the building, it does seem to me that promoting to higher office one of the officials who was on both the Audit and Risk and Remunerations sub-committees, who oversaw the payments to the fat Mancunian, reeks of rewarding failure.
THOSE PROFESSIONAL sports which allow their best exponents to make real money – think Golf and Lawn Tennis, appear to structure their year around certain major events.
In golf, the top guys get a few tournaments to loosen-up, before things get serious with The US Masters in late April. The next peak comes in June, with The US Open, followed in July by The Open, before, in August, we have the US PGA Championship. Then, every two years, the big guns get a final hurrah with The Ryder Cup.
Sure, they have weekly events throughout the year, which give them a chance to top-up their prize fund, but, if you're a top 50 player, these five events are the ones which matter.
It's the same in Tennis. The annual grind begins in January, with the Australian Open. The next big event is The French Open. In June, closely followed by Wimbledon, before the final major – The US Open follows in late August into early September.
Now, these are individual sports, perhaps it aids the top players to be able to build-up to big events, then ease-off for a time, before hyping themselves up again for the next big event, the calendar has a certain rhythm to it.
Does the same timeline work for team sports? I wonder. I sometimes feel, Rugby Union might benefit from a more obvious break between club games and international ones. After all, the only tier of the game where real money can be generated is the International one.
So, is there, I wonder, a case for a new look to the calendar. We begin with domestic league play (in professional terms Gallagher Premiership, Top 14 and United Rugby Championship games; then we go into the European games, before we end the season with The Guinness Six Nations.
You never know, it might work.
I also feel, the game needs to look more-seriously at separating governance of the game – what works for the club game doesn't work for the professional one and vice versa, and this separation should perhaps be taken as far as different laws for the two versions.


