THERE
IS a
story of a Tory grandee running through the litany of post-war
Conservative Prime Ministers: “Winston (Churchill), Anthony (Eden),
Harold (MacMillan), Alex (Douglas-Home), (Ted) Heath, Margaret
(Thatcher),” he intoned.
She was "One of Us" until it suited the men in the grey suits to get rid of her
Note
the odd one out, Heath was never: “One of us,” the Upper
Middle/Lower Upper Class elite, English public school-educated to
rule the world. Strictly speaking, neither was the Blessed Margaret,
but, she shared their beliefs and was tolerated – until they
thought she couldn't win, whereupon she was dumped.
Methinks
that same kind of thinking is now abroad within the BT Murrayfield
corridors of power. Allow me to extrapolate.
The
SRU's bye-laws and election rules are clearly written-down and can be
viewed on their website. They are there for a good reason, but, the
present “suits” don't do more than pay lip service to them, or so
it seems to me.
Go
to the “Who We Are” section of the SRU website and it is clear –
the SRU Council takes precedence over the Board – except, these
days it appears to be the Board - under the draconian rule of TCD - who are running things, and who have
the final word – when it should be the Council.
One of the Draconians - currently running the SRU
It
clearly states in the Bye-Laws: the Council membership should include
four representatives, one each from the Premiership and the three
National Leagues. As it stands, Peter Laverie is the Premiership
representative – except, Peter does not have a current Premiership
club, he is Director of Rugby for National League 2 GHK.
Also,
and I accept, six of the ten clubs are rather busy with another big
problem, but, the Premiership forum has not met since before the AGM.
Not perhaps as big an issue, when it seemed the Premiership would
vanish at the end of this season. However, that is no longer certain
amidst all the kerfuffle around S6/A3.
The
actual National League 2 rep is Colin Rigby of Stewart's-Melville,
while vice president Iain Barr is also with a National League 2 club
– Lasswade. Now, I have nothing against these gentlemen, in fact,
they are all good, genuine rugby guys, but the current set-up means,
the Premiership, National League 1 and National League 3 clubs do not
currently have one of their own sitting round the Council table - their rep is Andy Little from Highland, who are now a National League 2 club. Andy again, according to those who know him is: "A Good Guy," howeer, good job though he is doing, Is
it right that so-many albeit fine, reps, are from National League 2 clubs?
Elsewhere,
on the Council and the Board, we have the esteemed Willie Gardner,
who represents the Glasgow North Regional League clubs – these
smaller clubs, who do a great job, in difficult circumstances, in the
more-shallow rugby seams, have a second representative round the
table, since President “Doctor Who” is a member of Oban Lorne.
The
trouble with Willie Gardner being there is, his club, Lanark, no
longer competes in the West Regional Leagues, while I am reliably
informed, by a senior office bearer in one of the constituent clubs
that, apart from the vice presidential hustings (which were held in
the least-accessible place, at the least-popular time and were barely
quorate) the clubs in the bold Willie's constituency have never held
a for a since he got the job.
Willie
Gardner is also on the Board, which makes his lack of communication
with his constituents somehow worse.
Ah!
The Board, there's another cause for concern. Now, I admire the Wee
Bar Steward greatly, I will not hear a word against him, but, for all
the great things he has done in rugby, on and off the park –
according to the rules, Ian McLauchlan should by now be retired and
have been replaced, he has served his sentence. But, he's still
there.
Our
near-invisible Chairman should also have gone, hopefully to be
replaced by someone competent, while the process of recruiting
(OPENLY) new INDEPENDENT non-executive directors ought to be under
way. Needless to say, it isn't.
I
also hear, from contacts with access to the corridors of power, that
the bold Lance-Corporal Jones, whose propensity for panic got us into
much of the current moger, is still a power behind the throne –
where he ought to have been sent to the Scottish Rugby equivalent of
the old: “managing a power station in Mongolia” sentence which
was meeted-out to incompetent Soviet era apparatchiks.
The Doric Dan Quayle,being lined-up for a return to the SRU Council as a co-opted member
The
good Doctor Who, apparently, has not yet fully-mastered the
complexities of the sonic screwdriver, and wants “friends at court”
around her. We hear the Doric Dan Quayle, fresh from a place in the
Scotstoun posh seats for the recent Glasgow v Saracens game, is the
only candidate for one of the co-opted Council gigs. Mr Monro, in
everyone's view a huge loss (not) to the Diplomatic Corps, is
seemingly being lined-up to be the SRU's representative on the EPRC,
the body which runs the Heineken and Challenge Cups.
Still,
there is the odd flash of half-light, Fergus Neil is, I understand,
being lined-up to represent the Union at Rugby Europe.
We
can only hope, in his in-depth look at the governance, Gavin MacCall
QC can sweep away some of the cobwebs and allow light into some of
the darker recesses of where we are through the machinations of TCD
and his faithful Consigliore.
Finally,
and I am not having a go at the guy, whom I rather like, but, back to
Peter Laverie.
Peter Laverie - paid a high price for being in the wrong place at the wrong time
Back
in 2015 Peter was removed from his position as a Board member at
Glasgow Clyde College. He sat on the Board as the representative of
the teaching staff. I had a read at the case and it seems pretty
clear – Peter's removal was a case of “collateral damage”.
There is no evidence of any wrong-doing by him, he was simply, as
were other Board members, innocently, in the wrong place at the wrong
time.
But,
Peter was: “disqualified
for life from being a member of a number of other boards of
management in the further and higher education sector, where the
context is the management of public institutions, with a remit
involving the use of public funds.”
As
I have said, there is NO EVIDENCE of wrong-doing by Peter, I am
convinced he as in the wrong place at the wrong time, however,
although not strictly-speaking “ in
the further and higher education sector” the
SRU does run the Scottish Rugby Academy, which is a form of Higher
Education (albeit it that is an extreme view), but, the SRU does
have: “a
remit involving the use of public funds.”
Another
issue in Peter's experiences with Glasgow College, on which the SRU,
and the wider Scottish Rugby constituency might care to reflect is –
Peter Laverie and everyone else on the Glasgow Clyde College Board
was removed from office – under the protocol of “collective
responsibility.”
OK,
sadly for him and some other board members, they and Peter were
“collateral damage”, but, the principle of collective
responsibility was in play.
Would
the SRU Board care to square that with the fact, one of their own –
Lesley Thomson QC, conducted a still secret review into the conduct
of certain board members in the Keith Russell sacking.
Conduct
which led to Russell taking the SRU to an Industrial Tribunal, which
then led to the character of the CEO and the General Counsel being
publicly humiliated by the condemnation of their conduct by the
Tribunal judge. However, that conduct was okayed by the entire Board,
including Lesley Thomson QC, under the principle of collective
responsibility.
In
the case of Peter Laverie at Glasgow Clyde College, the actions which
cost him his directorship and landed him with life-long
disqualification from a similar position, were taken by a single
board member.
Harsh
though the punishment was, don't you wish the same standards were
in-play around the SRU?




Great piece AA especially around collective responsibility. After all the mea culpa at the AGM it is instructive that nothing has been done since then.
ReplyDeleteI’m firmly of the belief that the electorate get the politicians they deserve and that adage holds true in all elected body. That Mike Munro is even being considered for other council roles is staggering.
And as an aside what happened to new broom Ian Barr? He needs to step up to the plate
Stirring stuff! This sort of thing is very off-putting.... FYI, I set out this afternoon with lady wife in attendance to watch a local-ish rugby match; when parking up at the ground, I realised the game and the gargoyles running it no longer hold much attraction, so we just drove off to enjoy a nice outing elsewhere!
ReplyDelete