Regular
readers of the shite which
appears in this blog will be well aware of my liking for that old
Chinese curse: “May
you live in interesting times,” since,
in the context of Scottish Rugby, these are indeed interesting times.
For
nine players, today will be a low one, when they will be told by
Toony:
“Sorry
Son, but, you're not going to Japan.” The
rest of us will have to wait until tomorrow for the final 31-man
squad to be made public. Then, the players, back-room staff, the
“Hingers
Oan” within
The
Junta, and
the travelling Tartan
Army
can begin to finalise their preparations, while the rest of us –
once we have sorted out the TV schedules – can concentrate on what
rugby is going-on back here.
And
that is where things are getting truly interesting. OK, domestic
rugby, that bit which comes under Sheila
Begbie and
the SRU
Rugby Development Department has
already kicked-off. Edinburgh
have
started their pre-season games by despatching London
Scottish, while
Glasgow
Warriors get
their season underway against Ulster
this
weekend.
However,
Super-6,
if
not the elephant in the room, perhaps “the
Ethiopean in the fuel supply,” does
not click into gear until 9
November. That
is a mere nine and a bit weeks away; already the bulk of the six
squads are well into their pre-season training, with the final squads
due to be revealed and registered in exactly four weeks' time, on 30
September.
The
six franchises are drip-feeding the names of their squads into the
public domain. Stirling
County and
Ayr
have
perhaps been the most-open thus far, without giving too much away,
but, a look through the match-day squads which those Club
XVs
of the Super-6 franchise-holders put out on Saturday gives a clue as
to which of last season's squads have moved-up to S6.
The
word on the streets is that around 190
of
the 210
players
who can be registered for S6 are already known and in-place. The
concern for the rest of Scottish Rugby is this – what if there is a
football-style late flurry of transfer activity between now and the
signing deadline?
Might
we see some previously-overlooked players, either in the S6 “Club
XVs” or, more-worryingly for the clubs concerned, playing with
another clubs, plays out of their skins in September, causing the
local S6 franchise team's coach to make them an offer?
This
could happen, and, going forward, we may well have to have rigid
signing deadlines imposed. This is a scenario which is concerning
club coaches, and who can blame them. Players will always move, they
always have, it is a fact of life.
For
example, my all-time
Ayrshire XV
reads: Ian
McLauchlan (Ayr
Academy), Pat
McArthur, Jock McClure (Ayr),
Bill
Cuthbertson, Gordon Brown (Marr),
Alistair
McHarg (Irvine),
Gordon
Strachan (Ayr),
Peter
Brown (Marr);
Bryan
Gossman (Ardrossan),
Derrick
Lee (Ayr),
Derek
Stark (Kilmarnock),
Mark
Bennett (Cumnock),
Ian
Murchie (Ardrossan),
Steve
Munro (Ayr),
Niven
Rose (Dalry
HSFP). Replacements: Quinton
Dunlop, Gordon Reid, Jock Craig(Ayr),
David
Gray, Ian Blake (Kilmarnock),
Sandy
Service, John Brown (Ayr),
David
Shedden (Old
Spierians).
[No correspondence will be entered into as regards the make-up of the above squad; it's my blog, my selection, if you don't like my squad - tough]
Nearly
every one of those 23 players had to move away from their original
club to be recognised and capped. Were they playing today, they would
all have to move as rugby splits ever more-certainly into
“performance”
and
“community”
branches
of the game.
What
we must hope for is that, moving forward, those clubs, be they
Super-6 or in the upper strata of the National Leagues, don't simply
“poach” players, but ensure there is a two-way street, which
allows ambitious players to have a go at the big time, but, if it
doesn't work out, go back without too-much hassle.
What
we don't want to see, and this is a huge fear of the smaller clubs,
is the bigger clubs hoovering-up talent, which they then “warehouse”
in case they need them.
As
one Head Coach of a lower National league side said to me last week:
“We want
to see guys playing – not standing watching; if the higher-ranked
club doesn't need them for their match-day squad, they would be
better-off playing for their original club than standing around.”
I
don't see how anyone can argue with that. There has been a lot of
talk since S6 became a reality, of the perils of players “playing-up”
a level. It ought not
to be a one-way street, rather playing up or down ought to be
simpler.
For
the moment, the SRU is putting a lot of stock by S6, which looks
likely to be with us for at least the next five seasons. But, here's
a thought: suppose Ben
Ryan has already told the SRU: “Super-6
is shite, it will never work.”
Suppose
Jim Mallinder comes
in to his new role as Director
of Performance Rugby, and,
unlike his predecessor, is actually seen getting around games,
involving the S6 clubs, and, by the end of this season, he goes into
TCD's office
and tells him straight: “Mark,
Super-6 isn't working and it's a waste of money.”
What
Happens Then?
Super-6
has been flawed from the start.
For me, it was always at best a third-choice solution, dreamt-up
because the SRU has been unable to attract the commercial partners it
needs to successfully run the correct level of full-time professional
rugby, and it is attempting to lessen its own liabilities in this
area.
They
could well have come up with some sort of regional development plan,
but, the control freaks within BT Murrayfield will
not cede control, either to commercial concerns, or to a devolved
District or Regional set-up.
Super-6
Can work, for the
likes of Ayrshire Bulls,
Southern Knights and
Stirling County. I
believe Boroughmuir Bears can
make it work, but, I simply do not believe three franchises inside
Edinburgh can ever work. It will all end in tears in the capital.
What
Happens Then?
There
simply are not the players withn the Edinburgh catchment area to feed
three clubs, something will have to give.
Interesting
Times Right Enough
Show me the money! Moving up and down from S6 will involve many more financial considerations than is the case between current national league team. Committing to a S6 team with the increased number of coaching and conditioning sessions will probably mean a choice between work and rugby - big commitment time.
ReplyDeleteVery true OldBoy, which is why S6 is not for everyone. This is one of the flaws with the concept, and why the SRU is looking to see partnerships between S6 clubs and universities/colleges. It makes sense to have students playing S6, while studying, they can almost-certain ly better juggle the commitments than guys trying to balance work and training.
DeleteInteresting blog AA
ReplyDeleteNot sure I follow you though.
The whole premise.e - and I do mean whole - is that there must be an amateur game where players will not be paid and a “pro” game where they can. There will be no movement between these two layers unless someone decides they don’t want the glamour of the pro ranks (ha ha) and moves back down to the amateurs.
It’s the SRU that got themselves in the fankle by not thinking through the consequences of their actions.
There can be no playing down because that would be unfair to the “amateur” team the “pro” player would return to. Or in a different scenario the club side of the S6 team gets the added bonus of a suitably trained pro player.
I don’t give it five years tbh. Playing the same sides over and over ain’t much fun and won’t develop much cabability. Getting a kicking from the Welsh teams in the cup will be a delight also. All for around £4K a skull
Yes it’s the not game in town right now but let’s see how those fab finances at Murrayfield stack up over the next couple of years.