ONE-THIRD
of the Scottish Rugby Union's
member clubs yesterday sent a round-robin letter to SRU President Dee
Bradbury, demanding that she stand down the Governance Task Force
which she recently set-up.
Dee Bradbury
The
letter has the support of 38 clubs, including 8 of the current
Premiership sides, but drawn from all the national leagues, plus a
good number of regional league sides. The unhappy clubs also have the
support of a further dozen or more sides.
The
driving force is a set of 12 clubs, who have been in regular dialogue
over recent months, all of whom are concerned at the direction of
travel which the SRU's executive and board are taking in respect of
the club game.
I
was told: “there
is no distinct body which has been formed, we have a good mix of
clubs, from some of the top ones in Scotland, through to true grass
roots 'community' clubs.
“There
has been robust debate during our deliberations, with slightly
different views, but a common purpose – to make things better for
the club game.”
The
letter to President
Dee Bradbury reads:
“Dear
Dee,
We
hope that this letter finds you and your family safe and well.
These
are challenging times both for our Union and its member clubs. Good
governance is fundamental to the effective operation of the Union and
following the unanimous rejection of the Gammell/Murray proposals by
National and Regional League Forums, we feel it is imperative that
any future review on governance is conducted in the most consultative
and transparent manner with the appropriate amount of time taken to
ensure that it is done correctly.
The
Dunlop report on Governance provided for "One decision-
making
Board accountable to the clubs via a new Scottish Rugby Council”.
(Byelaws 14 and 15 of the Scottish Rugby Union
confirm the Council as the body to whom the Board is accountable.)
At
that time this was recognised as an example of good practice and,
while the needs and demands of our sport may require some updating of
governance, it is important to remember that Scottish Rugby was
established to advance the interests of the member clubs and their
sport.
Since
the introduction of the Dunlop proposals the role and
responsibilities of the Council have been eroded. The
Decision Making Matrix, the Code of Conduct, and Standing Orders of
Council appear to have collectively undermined the Council’s
ability to discharge its “responsibility for overseeing the
management of the affairs of the Union and reviewing the executive
management thereof delegated to the Scottish Rugby Board.” (Bye law
14.1).
There
might be other such documents and in order to properly assess the
current structure and why it is not working, Union members require
their immediate release, without redaction. If they conflict with the
bye laws, they are invalid and should be rescinded immediately.
You
will be aware of the current lack of trust that now exists between
the member clubs and the Board. This is damaging and in danger of
paralysing the organisation. There is a need to return to first
principles to revise the governance and, such a review must be driven
by, and recognise the fundamental interests of the Union members.
These
matters cannot be responsibly concluded in the next two months and in
time for this year's AGM. To conduct a full governance review
engaging with the Union members, followed by the necessary
consultation period will take many months, even without the current
Covid 19 crisis.
Therefore,
we urge you to consider the long term interests and disband the Task
Force. Standing down the Task Force will allow your successor to take
matters forward at the earliest opportunity, whilst allowing for the
time and effort that it so obviously requires.
We
look forward to your response in very early course given the anxiety
this matter is undoubtedly causing.
Yours
Sincerely.”
As
I understand it, this initiative by the clubs has the support of
several SRU Council
members, and they are
keen to see ALL the
SRU member clubs getting involved in reviewing where we currently
are, and where we are going.
“We
feel the Task Force should be stood down, as we feel that we need a
longer period of reflection and consultation.
“Looking
ahead, and in view of the current situation with the pandemic and the
special measures under which we are all operating, there is no need
for the rush which the Executive seems to wish, with regard to
implementing Gammell/Murray. A lot of things need to be discussed and
considered.”
The
organisers of the letter are now awaiting an early response from the
President. However, given the breadth of the support they have across
the entire spectrum of Scotland's rugby clubs, it seems clear, this
is a genuine challenge to the powers that be, and one they will need
to take seriously.
These
interesting times in which we are living, just got a lot more
interesting.

"If they conflict with the bye laws, they are invalid and should be rescinded immediately."
ReplyDeleteHmmm, I wonder what documents they are referring to?
While visiting the family's second and third homes many miles away in far-flung billabongs, the DSC and entourage have detected a measure of grudging sympathy amongst some reptiles for this pathetically powerless puppet President and her utterly nebulous term of office...
ReplyDeleteNow, she appears marooned between a rock and a hard place - because she will lose friends & supporters, whichever line she takes.....
Such drama, just as the SRU and Member Clubs struggle to survive intact against the crippling effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. That TCD has always looked an unhealthy specimem - just a thought! OK, more of a hope.
Great collaborative effort by the Malcontents to get this out. It would be interesting to see how many Clubs actually sent their letter to Dee in. These aforementioned Malcontents arent representatives of their own Clubs, but have successfully managed to get a consensus together, albeit by proxy.
ReplyDeleteThe Task Force itself is a farce...its incumbents all hand picked by the Board to deliver "their" outcome.
There has been no bigger puppet in this sorry saga than the President herself. Strings pulled and tugged by Messrs Dodson, Crassie, Howatt, Jeffries and Rankin throughout her tenure. Nice woman...but utterly useless. If she wants to be remembered for her contribution to grassroots rugby (and let's face it, there's no Club more rooted in the grass than her very own Oban Lorne) she should do the honourable thing and resign before the AGM and do it in her own style with a big middle finger to the Board whilst looking hard on her fag.
Read "looking" as "sooking!"
ReplyDeleteWell well well. There is a stirring in the clubs!
ReplyDeleteSets up a very interesting situation now. Does Dee bash on regardless? Or accept the request in the letter? I’m sure Mr Howat will be scrutinising the byelaws to enforce the current approach.
A wee question though. Under what authority is Dee acting? Who gave the Board all this control? It wasn’t the Clubs.
Oh we do live in interesting times
Clubfan: Dee appears to have set-up the Task Force at the behest of the Council. If this is indeed the case, it's a rare example of that body doing its job.
DeleteThanks AA
DeleteThe view from the clubs was quite clear. Gammell is a pile of poo. Get your fingers put and deal with this. The message back from Council was they would hand over to Ian Barr and the governance group.
Then McColl and the governance group get the boot. IB is sidelined as Dee launches the Taskforce.
Sorry but the Council didn’t of their own volition propose the taskforce (IMO). And even if they did it flies in the face of what the Council were asked to do by the clubs.
Trying to put lipstick on the pig that is Gammell isn’t a governance review or solution.
Totally correct. Just when The Board thought that they could get away with it hiding behind the coronavirus tragedy it's good that some clubs are rallying around to take the biggest disease in our game on.
ReplyDelete