SOME
fellow members of the Scottish
Rugby Brains Trust and I have been speculating on what a Scottish version
of the New Zealand Rugby Union's proposed internal tournament, aimed
at getting their top sides playing again, might look like.
The
New Zealand proposals would have their five Super Rugby franchises
playing each other in closed stadia as a means of getting them up to
speed, in preparation for a later return to full play in Super Rugby
and in time, the international game.
In
New Zealand, with the Blues, Chiefs, Crusaders, Highlanders
and Hurricanes – you have sufficient numbers to run a viable
competition. We don't have that number of teams in Scotland, so,
Edinburgh v Glasgow played on a constant loop simply would not work.
However,
we do have – when we count the six FOSROC franchises - a total of
eight teams in Scotland who are wholly-owned, or have their finances
under-pinned by the SRU. Two plus six used to, when I was at school,
add-up to eight; eight clubs is the right number for a viable
competition. After all, the idea is to prepare the teams for a return
to normality – or whatever passes for normality in this
post-pandemic world.
If,
as we have been told, S6 is, in part, to be a means of bridging the
gap between the club and professional tiers of the game, well, here
is a good opportunity, by mixing and matching, to see how deep is our
talent pool, and how well the full-time and semi-professional players
perform together.
New
Zealand TV will, naturally, fall over themselves to broadcast the
games involving their teams – even if these are played in empty
stadia. Ah hae ma doots about Premier Sports being as-keen to
showcase my proposed eight-club series.
Indeed,
it may well be that, if such a tournament was to be played, the only
broadcast outlet might be Scottish Rugby TV, or, perhaps if the SRU
asked politely enough – BBC Shortbread.
Given
we would probably have to see player pools mixed-up somewhat, I don't
know if we could stick with the usual team names. We could always
rename the teams temporarily, perhaps as districts: Caledonia
North, Caledonia Midlands, Edinburgh North, Edinburgh South, The
South, The Borders, Glasgow, West of Scotland.
However,
from where I am sitting, getting the big boys back playing is not the
most-important thing. How we get the grass roots clubs playing, and
what sort of game they will be embracing, is far-more important to
the long-term well-being of the game in Scotland.
While
I can still see the game of rugby being shut down for the remainder
of 2020, and well into 2021, how we get things restarted at ordinary
club level will, I feel, be THE most-difficult problem for the SRU to
overcome.
The
Union's entire management model in recent years has been focussed on
the professional game. The basic tactic is to have a Scotland team
playing such entertaining, successful rugby, that every game at BT
Murrayfield is a sell-out and that gate money generated, plus the TV
income runs the entire show.
So,
after the financial hit the Union will have to take with the
shut-down, it stands to reason, the executive's focus will be on
getting the golden goose back laying again.
And
the ordinary clubs, who regardless of the fact they own the Union,
tend to be perceived in the corridors of power as something of a
drain on resources and time, well, they will come a poor second to
the performance teams when it comes to the paid administrators'
attention span.
Mind
you, this morning's news that the New Zealand Rugby Union is
considering losing half of its 180 full-time staff, coming on top of
rumours of carnage on the job front at Twickenham, an absolute melt
down in Sydney and prophesies of doom in Cardiff, just might cause
some concern among the 450 employees of the SRU.
Surely,
if we are to survive – we MUST lose a lot of fat from BT
Murrayfield. Well, if they ask me, I could, like Koko, the Lord High
Executioner in The Mikado provide a little list, and I could
guarantee, of the names on that list: “There's none of them
be missed, there's none of them be missed.”
This
pandemic offers us a chance to restructure the SRU and Scottish
Rugby, and make it ready to move ahead, once we get to what I hope
will be the new normal. But, will the game take this chance? I hope
so.
Not so much forthcoming cuts, AA.....
ReplyDeleteThe DSC and friends are expecting transformational change. New landscape around the billabong....
For instance - what about the 2 ProTeams? Pro14 looking like a busted flush - a cross-border competition all dressed-up, with nowhere to play any games, or at least no prospect of seamless travel to and from games in the various countries.
Tough times are a coming AA. The question for EH12 is do they get ahead of things or are they trampled in the rush to sort it later?
ReplyDeleteYou raise a very interesting question about the gravy train that is the International team. I can well imagine the disdain for club rugby in Murrayfield. It’s not like Princess Ann turns up at Inverleith Park to watch Edinburgh Northern.
Where does all the money generated by the big team go? Mainly to pay for the pro teams and their support infrastructure and the behemoth that is administration at Murrayfield.
Club support is £4M. The salaries and bonuses of the top five execs at Murrayfield are worth 70% of that number. Yes the rugby Development team costs have to be factored in. Even that comes no where near what is being funded for professional rugby.
So less snatch from Murrayfield please!