I
WONDER, as
they watch from the great press box in the sky, the bourach which
Scottish Rugby has become in 2018, what those giants of the past:
Bill McLaren, Norman Mair, Brian Meek and Jock Wemyss, make of things.
Brian Meek - I wonder what he and his like would make of today's moger
We
are in deep, deep doo-dah, and, as if to confirm that one paper is in
intensive care and the other in its death throes, The (Glasgow)
Herald and The Scotsman do not seem to be noticing – so busy are
their sports desk staff in covering the slightly lesser travails of
our national football team – that Scottish Rugby too, is terminally
ill.
But,
at least big David Barnes and his terrific website: The
Offside Line, has
noticed, while down in darkest East Ayrshire, an aged hack is also
warning that, unless things change – and quickly, we are awe
doomed!!
Barney
has written and promoted several excellent pieces on the demise of
Scottish rugby in recent months, but, perhaps yesterday's piece,
penned by Haddington RFC's President, Keith Wallace, was the grimmest
and most-serious warning yet.
We
need change, and quickly, or we will not have much of Scottish Rugby
left.
Sure,
TCD and the BT Murrayfield minions are good at sending-out glossy
press releases, assuring us that all is well with the game, we are
headed for the bright, sunlit uplands of great things, and world
domination is just around the corner.
Then
Keith, a guy toiling at the coal face to keep the club he loves
going, jumps in with a dose of grim reality.
Simply
reading his piece, which is, unlike some recent offerings from BTM,
full of FACTS,
and
garnered from a guy in the front line, not somebody from GHQ, some
miles back, is frankly scary.
Keith
confirms what those of us who live in the real world have long been
aware of, the player base in Scotland is shrinking – the young men
of today simply have fallen out of love with playing the game. And if
the alarming drop-off in players isn't halted soon, we will be unable
to sustain the game.
But,
the national team regularly sells-out the 67,000 capacity national
stadium. Glasgow Warriors are packing them in at Scotstoun, and
Edinburgh's crowds appear to be rising, albeit from a
disgracefully-low base. So, from the cosy confines of BTM's executive
offices, all seems well with the world – if you ignore the fact
costs are rising faster than income and they are having to run faster
merely to stand still as the black hole of the professional game
swallows more and more cash.
I
have been impressed by the efforts the six “lucky” clubs which
have gained Super-6 franchises have been and are continuing to make,
to make this flawed camel of a project work, but, I fear from them –
simply because BTM has made such a cock-up of the whole thing from
the start.
When
is BTM going to face reality and admit:
Super-6
is a PERFORMANCE league – which will have a detrimental effect of
the DOMESTIC game, particularly in Edinburgh and the Lothians.
As
Keith Wallace proves in his TOL
piece, the consequences of the ludicrous notion, you can have three
of the six franchises within the capital, will be far-reaching.
Keith Wallace
I
have been saying for a while now – Scottish Rugby is now a two-tier
game, and ought to be organised as such. We should let BTM run the
national team, the Academy and age-group teams and Super-6 –
everything else should be run by a rugby equivalent of the Scottish
Junior Football Association, a Scottish Junior Rugby Union (SJRU).
This
should be run by the clubs themselves, and a very-small national
office, on a regionalised basis. Let the clubs work in a way which
best suits their own particular needs, FFS, the Border League has
been running for far longer than the National Leagues, and with less
fuss, it can easily be done.
I
am convinced, freed from the dead, clammy hand of BTM
control-freakery, ordinary club rugby could, if not flourish as in
the past, but, have a future.
This
week the WRU faced reality, and re-organised itself. They now have a
Professional Game Board to look after the professional game, and a
Community Game Board to look after the grass-roots.
In
Ireland, they have a more-federal set-up, with the IRFU delegating a
greater degree of freedom to the four provincial unions – Connacht,
Leinster, Munster and Ulster. They run the four PRO14 teams and
infrastructure, but, more-importantly they run the community game
from far-closer to the clubs than BTM could ever be.
The
ordinary clubs in Ulster don't have to trot down to Dublin to learn
what is happening, ditto the clubs in Munster, instead, their
contacts are with guys they know in Belfast, or Cork – why then
cannot we have Regional officials based in Aberdeen, Dundee, Glasgow,
Ayrshire or the Borders?
A
SJRU would, I am certain, be more nimble than the bloated Murrayfield
administration, closer to the game, more-able to react to local
issues. We would be able to see District problems sorted out at
District level. We would be rid of this ludicrous system whereby
neighbouring clubs barely communicate, because one is a National
League team, whose only off-field interaction is with other National
League clubs at their forum, and the other is a District League cub,
which attends the District Forum.
And,
while we are at it, having the bigger semi-professional clubs
speaking directly to BTM and the smaller, community clubs speaking
via the SJRU would sort-out another bug bear with the smaller clubs.
As
it stands, and, as Keith Wallace's excellent article demonstrated,
Super-6 will hoover-up a lot of ambitious and gifted players from
smaller clubs, with no guarantee of present players who are discarded
as being, not good enough, or ambitious enough, or able to give
sufficient time from their day jobs to be semi-professionals, going
in the opposite direction.
So,
if the S6 clubs are going to raid the community clubs for new talent
– let them pay compensation. Let's have an internal transfer
market, so, the compensation a club such as my own one of Cumnock
might get, from sending a promising young player to Ayr, can be spent
in keeping the club's grass-roots work going, to produce more good
players.


The Clubs have already agreed to a new company being setup for Pro & Performance rugby to be moved into (remember that hastily arranged SGM) - well let's use it, and then we can have a better idea of what Pro & Performance rugby actually costs the game in Scotland.
ReplyDeleteThat eminently sensible proposal would represent a better way ahead than to - as some have suggested - simply split professional & community rugby under the aegis of two separate bodies - akin to lying down and giving up the ghost (and future) of grassroots Scottish rugby.
DeleteTo seek a community rugby breakaway would surely just represent a hand over of Scottish rugby's grassroots foundations, aka its family jewels to the current Murrayfield cabal, lock, stock & barrel.
Better by far for member clubs first to wrest back control of the overall governance of the Game in Scotland - and only then to hive off the running / financing / management of the professional side of things to a semi-autonomous corporate subsidiary ultimately accountable to the main national union of all member clubs. Thereby, in the final analysis, control would "remain" (!) with the clubs, while, within reasonable prescribed limits, the financial, strategic & operational management, etc. of the professional Game would be undertaken separately.
Well said AA.
ReplyDeleteWe aren’t unique in this area. As you highlighted before, Ireland has a similar club issue with a big drop off in playing numbers while the pro teams are beating off spectators with a stick.
A societal shift is happening - go watch rather than play.
Back in the day it was players and x players who populated the terraces of Murrayfield. Now it’s a social event and many players can’t get there due to fixtures.
I’m not seeing much action from Murrayfield on anything at the moment
Crisis management consultants' advice to SRU - "keep yer big dribblin' mooths shut an' yer baw heids doon under yon parapet".
DeleteCharge for professional services, £25,000. Thank you for your custom!