YESTERDAY,
I looked at the percentage of
players who were actually playing, basing these percentages on the
data released by the SRU through their new SCRUMS registration
service.
Today,
I am going to concentrate on the percentage of matches
played in both adult
and youth male rugby. I have looked at games played since the new
season kicked-off with the first youth games on the weekend of 24/25
August.
The
figures were:
|
|
Week ending |
Games scheduled |
Games played |
%
played |
|
Adult
male |
24/08/19 |
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Youth
male |
24/08/19
|
84
|
62
|
74
|
|
Adult
male |
31/08/19
|
55
|
45
|
82
|
|
Youth
male |
31/08/19
|
131
|
100
|
76
|
|
Adult
male |
07/09/19
|
106
|
86
|
81
|
|
Youth
male |
07/09/19
|
227
|
166
|
73
|
|
Adult
male |
14/09/19
|
116
|
93
|
80
|
|
Youth
male |
14/09/21
|
189
|
165
|
87
|
|
Adult
male |
21/09/19
|
112
|
92
|
82
|
|
Youth
male |
21/09/19
|
147
|
101
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adult
male |
overall
|
389
|
316
|
81
|
|
Youth
male |
overall
|
778
|
594
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
School games |
overall
|
301
|
211
|
70
|
|
Youth
games |
overall
|
477
|
383
|
80
|
So,
overall, over the opening weeks of the season – the time when you
might expect enthusiasm and fitness to be at its peak, we find that
one-fifth of the scheduled adult male games remained unplayed, while
around three-quarters of the scheduled youth male games were also
unplayed.
In
the case of 84% of the unplayed adult games, the reason for the
postponement was a shortage of players by one or both teams.
When
it comes to a shortage of players causing postponement of youth
games, the percentage was 67% - lack of players the reason for 135 of
the 203 cancellations thus far.
The
percentages when it comes to schools games versus club games are: a
lack of players caused 60% of the schools postponements, at club
level, this rose to 72%.
It
should also be noted, in the various conferences, there are some
clubs or schools who are struggling at one or two age groups – or
are suffering a shortage of front-row forwards. These tend to
somewhat skew the figures.
The
question is: Is seeing between 20% and 30% of scheduled games
postponed each month acceptable, or not?
I
appreciate the default position of many people out there in clubman
is to blame the SRU for everything that goes wrong – including
unplayed games. My position is, if I think the SRU are messing-up, I
will say so, but, I don't think they can be blamed for the unplayed
games.
The
Union arranges leagues and youth conferences, and the divisions
within these according to information they receive from the clubs. It
is not their fault if a club, having committed to entering a certain
league, then discovers it does not have the players to live up to
their pre-season expectations. It is up to the club to either, bite
the bullet and withdraw, or, work harder to address the player
shortage and hang-in there.
It
is noticeable that, in the schools field, there are various instances
of “Development games' being played when there are not enough
players to get a full match done and dusted. It would be no bad thing
if the clubs began to play more such games when faced with a player
shortage – better to have a game of some sort rather than a blank
weekend.
I
can recall, from my own playing days, way back last century, down at
“Coarse Rugby” level, you could safely trot off to an away game,
maybe up to five players short, and be able to either pick-up spare
players from your hosts, or play a short-handed game.
I
doubt that today's players are less-keen than we were and am certain,
if they had the opportunity to play a fun, short-sided game, they
would take it.
Of
course, today's obsession with playing in leagues, or competitive
games may have something to do with this. We played for fun and some
of the most-enjoyable games were played short-sided.
AUSTRALIAN
scrum-half
Nic Groom has
been named as Edinburgh's
captain
– on his debut – for tomorrow night's Guinness
PRO14 opener,
against Zebre,
at
BT Murrayfield
tomorrow
night.
Richard
Cockerill has
named the following squad, as always here in 1-23 order, for the
game:
Pierre
Schoeman, Dave Cherry, Pietro Ceccarelli, Fraser McKenzie, Murray
Douglas, Lewis Carmichael, Luke Crosbie, Nick Haining; Nic Groom
(captain), Jaco van der Walt, Duhan van der Merwe, Matt Scott, Mark
Bennett, Jamie Farndale, Damien Hoyland. Replacements:
Mike Willemse, Jamie Bhatti, Murray McCallum, Mesu Kunavula, Ally
Miller, Charlie Shiel, Simon Hickey, George Taylor.
Groom
is joined in making his Edinburgh debut by Number Eight Nick Haining,
while Mike Willemse, Jamie Bhatti and Mesu Kunavula are all poised to
make their PRO14 debut for the club off the bench.
SPEAKING
of
the PRO14, I am more than a tad upset at the lack of commentary on
BBC
Radio Shortbread
on tonight's Warriors' game in South Africa. Certainly, the match is
not being advertised as being covered. Indeed, there is absolutely no
mention of either the Glasgow or Edinburgh league openers on the BBC
Scotland Sport website. Not
good enough BBC.
I had a look at the Under 18 conferences a couple of weeks ago and the average was running at 62% - but that was mainly due to Shogun and Galant A Conference - take these two out, and the average dropped to 52%.
ReplyDeleteFor me, a big issue with the youth game is the Unions maximum game time policy that restricts youth players to a maximum of one game in a 48 hour period - kids must choose to play for either the school on a Saturday or Club on a Sunday - however, as far as I'm aware, no other governing Union has this policy - they all (as far as I know), adopt the game a day recommendation from World Rugby.
I feel the policy was specifically brought in to encourage kids to play for their school and not local Club, whilst this weeks new strategy document just re-inforces this personal view.
There is no "strategy" for developing Club male youth rugby, whilst the schools strategy includes:
"Working with our schools in the regions, our focus is on improving the retention and transition of players graduating into the adult game."
Focussing on schools rugby to the detriment of Club youth rugby means there is a lack of connection with Clubs, which puts another barrier in the way of kids transitioning to the Club game.
"Fewer, but stronger" is not mentioned in the strategy, but it's shadow is certainly still hovering around.
No it’s not acceptable.
ReplyDeleteYou make an interesting argument about who holds the responsibility for this. I agree this can’t be laid solely at the door of the SRU. Clubs absolutely have the bigger share of any blame.
However who drives the leagues? I’m sure the SRU will say the clubs asked for it but it’s the SRU who mandate the competitions.
And points make prizes. So MoS cash is predicated on teams playing in leagues.
Finally the SRU entered the murky world of leagues when they set up the S6 A3 debacle. Up to then they had sensibly said “ that’s for clubs to decide”. Well noo they ken! They never had an opinion on league structures and wouldn’t back any particular motion on these issues.
But we don’t really need to worry as what happened in the past wasn’t evidenced so we can’t really compare today’s figures with those of several years ago. That makes me sleep easier!
The DSC reckons that by extrapolating player / squad numbers from games actually played at a point in time, a reasonably accurate figure of active players will be obtained.
ReplyDeleteAnd - that ain't anywhere close to SRU numbers!
Go figure, guys....