Aristotle Armstrong

Aristotle Armstrong
The thrawn, alternative voice of Scottish Rugby

Friday, 27 September 2019

Are these figures acceptable?


YESTERDAY, I looked at the percentage of players who were actually playing, basing these percentages on the data released by the SRU through their new SCRUMS registration service.

Today, I am going to concentrate on the percentage of matches played in both adult and youth male rugby. I have looked at games played since the new season kicked-off with the first youth games on the weekend of 24/25 August.

The figures were:



Week ending
Games scheduled
Games played
% played
Adult male
24/08/19
0
0
0
Youth male
24/08/19
84
62
74
Adult male
31/08/19
55
45
82
Youth male
31/08/19
131
100
76
Adult male
07/09/19
106
86
81
Youth male
07/09/19
227
166
73
Adult male
14/09/19
116
93
80
Youth male
14/09/21
189
165
87
Adult male
21/09/19
112
92
82
Youth male
21/09/19
147
101
69






Adult male
overall
389
316
81
Youth male
overall
778
594
76






School games
overall
301
211
70
Youth games
overall
477
383
80

So, overall, over the opening weeks of the season – the time when you might expect enthusiasm and fitness to be at its peak, we find that one-fifth of the scheduled adult male games remained unplayed, while around three-quarters of the scheduled youth male games were also unplayed.

In the case of 84% of the unplayed adult games, the reason for the postponement was a shortage of players by one or both teams.

When it comes to a shortage of players causing postponement of youth games, the percentage was 67% - lack of players the reason for 135 of the 203 cancellations thus far.

The percentages when it comes to schools games versus club games are: a lack of players caused 60% of the schools postponements, at club level, this rose to 72%.

It should also be noted, in the various conferences, there are some clubs or schools who are struggling at one or two age groups – or are suffering a shortage of front-row forwards. These tend to somewhat skew the figures.

The question is: Is seeing between 20% and 30% of scheduled games postponed each month acceptable, or not?

I appreciate the default position of many people out there in clubman is to blame the SRU for everything that goes wrong – including unplayed games. My position is, if I think the SRU are messing-up, I will say so, but, I don't think they can be blamed for the unplayed games.

The Union arranges leagues and youth conferences, and the divisions within these according to information they receive from the clubs. It is not their fault if a club, having committed to entering a certain league, then discovers it does not have the players to live up to their pre-season expectations. It is up to the club to either, bite the bullet and withdraw, or, work harder to address the player shortage and hang-in there.

It is noticeable that, in the schools field, there are various instances of “Development games' being played when there are not enough players to get a full match done and dusted. It would be no bad thing if the clubs began to play more such games when faced with a player shortage – better to have a game of some sort rather than a blank weekend.

I can recall, from my own playing days, way back last century, down at “Coarse Rugby” level, you could safely trot off to an away game, maybe up to five players short, and be able to either pick-up spare players from your hosts, or play a short-handed game.

I doubt that today's players are less-keen than we were and am certain, if they had the opportunity to play a fun, short-sided game, they would take it.

Of course, today's obsession with playing in leagues, or competitive games may have something to do with this. We played for fun and some of the most-enjoyable games were played short-sided.



AUSTRALIAN scrum-half Nic Groom has been named as Edinburgh's captain – on his debut – for tomorrow night's Guinness PRO14 opener, against Zebre, at BT Murrayfield tomorrow night.

Richard Cockerill has named the following squad, as always here in 1-23 order, for the game:

Pierre Schoeman, Dave Cherry, Pietro Ceccarelli, Fraser McKenzie, Murray Douglas, Lewis Carmichael, Luke Crosbie, Nick Haining; Nic Groom (captain), Jaco van der Walt, Duhan van der Merwe, Matt Scott, Mark Bennett, Jamie Farndale, Damien Hoyland. Replacements: Mike Willemse, Jamie Bhatti, Murray McCallum, Mesu Kunavula, Ally Miller, Charlie Shiel, Simon Hickey, George Taylor.

Groom is joined in making his Edinburgh debut by Number Eight Nick Haining, while Mike Willemse, Jamie Bhatti and Mesu Kunavula are all poised to make their PRO14 debut for the club off the bench.



SPEAKING of the PRO14, I am more than a tad upset at the lack of commentary on BBC Radio Shortbread on tonight's Warriors' game in South Africa. Certainly, the match is not being advertised as being covered. Indeed, there is absolutely no mention of either the Glasgow or Edinburgh league openers on the BBC Scotland Sport website. Not good enough BBC.




3 comments:

  1. I had a look at the Under 18 conferences a couple of weeks ago and the average was running at 62% - but that was mainly due to Shogun and Galant A Conference - take these two out, and the average dropped to 52%.

    For me, a big issue with the youth game is the Unions maximum game time policy that restricts youth players to a maximum of one game in a 48 hour period - kids must choose to play for either the school on a Saturday or Club on a Sunday - however, as far as I'm aware, no other governing Union has this policy - they all (as far as I know), adopt the game a day recommendation from World Rugby.

    I feel the policy was specifically brought in to encourage kids to play for their school and not local Club, whilst this weeks new strategy document just re-inforces this personal view.

    There is no "strategy" for developing Club male youth rugby, whilst the schools strategy includes:
    "Working with our schools in the regions, our focus is on improving the retention and transition of players graduating into the adult game."

    Focussing on schools rugby to the detriment of Club youth rugby means there is a lack of connection with Clubs, which puts another barrier in the way of kids transitioning to the Club game.

    "Fewer, but stronger" is not mentioned in the strategy, but it's shadow is certainly still hovering around.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No it’s not acceptable.

    You make an interesting argument about who holds the responsibility for this. I agree this can’t be laid solely at the door of the SRU. Clubs absolutely have the bigger share of any blame.

    However who drives the leagues? I’m sure the SRU will say the clubs asked for it but it’s the SRU who mandate the competitions.

    And points make prizes. So MoS cash is predicated on teams playing in leagues.

    Finally the SRU entered the murky world of leagues when they set up the S6 A3 debacle. Up to then they had sensibly said “ that’s for clubs to decide”. Well noo they ken! They never had an opinion on league structures and wouldn’t back any particular motion on these issues.

    But we don’t really need to worry as what happened in the past wasn’t evidenced so we can’t really compare today’s figures with those of several years ago. That makes me sleep easier!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The DSC reckons that by extrapolating player / squad numbers from games actually played at a point in time, a reasonably accurate figure of active players will be obtained.

    And - that ain't anywhere close to SRU numbers!

    Go figure, guys....

    ReplyDelete