CVC
Capital Partners is almost a
model of discretion. This Luxembourg-based private equity company
which now owns a sizeable chunk of professional rugby via its
investments in the PRO14, the Gallagher Premiership and, since money
talks – sooner rather than later, the Six Nations does tend to
maintain a low profile, as it concentrates in making oodles of money
for its investors.
Donald Mackenzie of CVC
The
main man in the company is, naturally where really big money is
concerned, a Scot – Jersey-based chartered accountant Donald
Mackenzie. This
Donald keeps a low profile and not a lot is known about him, He is a
Merchistonian, whose
alma mater is the University
of Dundee. One of his
contemporaries while he was at Merchiston was, apparently, a certain
John Jeffery, who
has just been appointed Chairman
of The
SRU. Some might say,
a case of real influence around Murrayfield switching from Old
Fettesians to Old
Merchistonians.
There
was an interesting quote, regarding the CVC investment in Rugby in an
Irish Times article which I read: “So
as ever, there will be winners and losers. The world of rugby is
already loaded towards the biggest unions. The best players will
follow the money, wherever that might be.
A
small number of people may be about to get very rich. But at what
cost?”
CVC's
previous major investment in sport was its ownership of Formula
One motor racing. They paid £1.4 billion to buy F1 from Bernie
Ecclestone in 2006, then ran it – with Ecclestone continuing to be
the main man – until selling it to Liberty Media in 2017, for £8
billion. It is estimated they made a return of over 300% on their
investment over those 11 years of ownership.
However,
to quote from a Guardian
article,
reviewing CVC's ownership of FI, and speculating on how CVC might
impact on Rugby:
“There
was pursuit of profit at every
possible
level but with apparently little interest in making the experience
better or more popular. It was a distasteful, cynical process that
left F1 tarnished.”
We
should remember, however, CVC owned F1 outright,they are only, for
the moment buying minority stakes in the various rugby competitions –
a stake which will, however, give them a major say in decisions taken
as to how to govern the game going forward.
In
motor racing, they (CVC) were only running the absolute top
world-wide competition, the double cream of the game. By taking a
share in the Six Nations, the PRO14 and the Gallagher Premiership,
they will have a say in how we buy single cream, milk and butter.
During
the period when CVC ran F1, the world governing body, the FIA
still
ran world motor sport. They might have authorised the British
Racing Drivers Club to
run the British
Grand Prix, but,
they needed Motorsport
UK on-board
to make it work, while that body continued to run all those club
events, the rallies, moto-cross meets, the karting events and so on –
the grass-roots part of the sport from which came Jim
Clark, Jackie Stewart, David Coulthard, Colin McCrae, Andrew Cowan
and
so on.
It
is one thing, being the absolute rulers of the richest tier of an
expensive sport, both to participate in and to watch, and another
thing entirely being a minority shareholder in three of the
professional tiers in a global sport with deep community routes.
To
make the sort of money and achieve the sort of returns they are used
to achieving, CVC will need to be a bit more co-operative and
perhaps less goal-orientated than they were accused of being while
involved in F1.
What
happens going forward, particularly in light of changes in the game's
structure which we may see post-pandemic, will, I believe, ensure, we
will be living in interesting times for a wee while to come.
We
may yet see a major split with that part of rugby which can be sold
on television and be attractive to the guys who handle the
sponsorship monies of big business, the part which includes the
very-best players and the major stadia, being split-off from the real
heartlands of club and community rugby.
But,
should that happen, and it is a distinct possibility, leet's hope the
grass roots game does not sell its birthright too-cheaply so that it
can continue to thrive and offer the real rugby experience of being a
club member, with a say in the sport, rather than merely a spectator,
paying for the privilege of watching better players.
OTHER
THAN, maybe
some fellow Borderer, on whom he had stood during a
particularly
fiesty Border
League game,
I cannot think of anyone with a bad word to say about our new SRU
Chairman, John Jeffrey.
John Jeffrey
He
is, as one of the 1990
Immortals , a
National
Treasure, and
we all wish him well in his new post. But,
and
what a pity there has to be a but, his elevation to the Chairmanship
has not been met with the ringing of bells and universal jubilation.
This
is mainly because, JJ's transition from: “The
White Shark,” permanently
stretching the offside line to its limits and beyond, rampaging
around the park knocking over opponents and spreading mayhem during
his 40-cap Scotland career; helping to temporarily convert the
Calcutta
Cup to
the Calcutta
Plate; well,
what red-blooded rugby-enjoying Scot could not warm to that guy.
John
Jeffrey, co-opted
member of the
SRU Council, nominated
SRU representative on the World
Rugby Council, nominated
Scottish Rugby representative on, and Chairman
of
Six
Nations Rugby, well,
that John Jeffrey is a different beast entirely – all those
nominations, and not once having to stand for election by his peers
within Scottish rugby – that makes JJ the ultimate insider.
To
be fair, JJ is at the moment, only interim Chairman.
But,
as we know, once you're inside the BT Murrayfield bubble, at a
high-enough level, it's very-difficult for you to be got rid of if
you don't perform.
I
have a lot of time for and confidence in JJ, but, I would like to see
him, should his interim chairmanship prove to be a longer tenure,
standing-up at the AGM and giving us, the poor bloody infantry of the
game here, an idea of his vision and route map for the way ahead,
which looks like being a particularly arduous, not to say rocky,
road.

Eh, AA?
ReplyDelete1. CVC Capital Partners are not into philanthropy.
2. Please don't be blinded by the glare of once-upon-a-time "legend" status.
The Junta has appointed one of its own.
DSC, re your comments.
ReplyDelete1. I think that is taken as read.
2. third-last paragraph, I quote: "That makes JJ the ultimate insider."
Oh dear - while the ineffably awkward DSC never apologises (taken as a sign of weakness in Durham), please accept the retort that although it may have looked like that, the previous post wasn't intended to read as a blast at your piece, AA. More like a snappy re-inforcement of your points.
DeleteWhew - please now go forth, light of step, clear of mind, jockstrap adjusted, unto the source of whatever rays of sunshine which may currently be gracing your manicured Elysian Fields....
DeleteExplanation accepted old boy.
The curious thing about CVC is why are they investing in rugby?
ReplyDeleteA niche sport globally that IMO hasn’t got that much head room to expand.
As TSC says. They are there for the money not the benefit of our sport.
Perhaps if they tie up all the lead leagues around the world and drive the TV contracts there will be better returns but not to the level that a PE house would want.
Remember the old adages “investments go go down as well as up”. Private equity are no better than any other investor at this. It’s just that the overall profits they make mask the failures of some of their investments.