Aristotle Armstrong

Aristotle Armstrong
The thrawn, alternative voice of Scottish Rugby

Friday, 27 November 2020

The Times They Are A Changin'


WHEN it comes to Ian Barr being a new broom, backed-up by several newcomers to the Council, and driving through the necessary changes to make the Scottish Rugby Union better, I remain a believer.


We will not see a Chinook landing on the big pitch at Murrayfield, to carry-off TCD and The Junta, while the massed ranks of Mosstroopers, Eckies (both Edinburgh and Glasgow), Weegies, Teuchters, Lowlanders, Sheep Shaggers and other interested parties are being held off at the gates, but, I do believe we are now at the end of the beginning of the professionals running professional rugby as their own little corner of the Empire.

 

 

The taxi for The Junta may take some time to get here


The successful passing of the Currie and Glasgow Hawks motions at last night's virtual AGM, part two, will hopefully be seen, by the embattled Junta this morning as a sign: “The natives are not only restless Carruthers; they're getting organised.” This is not good news for The Junta.


The passing of these two motions will surely convince any soft pedallers on President Barr's Governance Review Group (GRG), that they can be a wee bit more forceful in pushing for change – might is right, and they have the vast majority of the clubs behind them.


However, the clubs have great expectations of the Review Group – they want change, and big change. Managing those expectations will be a difficult line to tread – I wish them well.


The Junta is clearly going to have to change its ways. I do not intend going into too-great detail as to what I think needs doing. I feel big David Barnes did a sufficiently-thorough job on setting-out what needs doing, in his piece on The Offside Line prior to the AGM. Not for the first time in recent years, he hit the nail right on the head.


The days of mini-empire building within BTM need to end. For instance, as David pointed out, the SRU's staff roster had risen from 401 to 458 in the year to May 2020 – that's a rise of over 14%, in a year in which turnover fell from £61 million to £55.4 – a drop of just over 9%.


More-worryingly, the auditors – PriceWaterhouseCooper - in the words of TCD himself: “Have not yet signed off (the accounts) because they want to “test our assumptions and look beyond this current [financial] year, through to the beginning of 2022.”


I am confident the SRU is big enough to get over this speed bump, but, that is not a good look for a national institution.


The AGM has hopefully been a long-needed shot across the bow of a secretariat which has, for too-long, been seen as beyond the control of the people they are supposed to be working for – the clubs.


It will be some months yet before the GRG reports. What they come up with will be interesting, but, we can but hope, we see the changes which are required implemented.


For me that should include:


  • Fewer paid executives and more elected representatives on the main Board.

  • A truly Independent Chairman appointed.

  • Some of the “broken arrows” within BTM finally binned.

  • A leaner, fitter SRU arising from the ashes.


We have high expectations of Ian Barr and the group, now, go for it lads.




5 comments:

  1. When you say "SRU is big enough to get over this speed bump", is that big as in Arcardia Group big - who may soon be entering administration cause their bank aren't willing to sign a new facility.

    If the auditors don't have faith in the Boards assumptions, why should the bank - we've been warned last night, we need several positive financial agreements to happen in the not too distant future, or else we're in serious trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We should see a paper from the governance group in the New Year and his the clubs will get involved in the consultation.

    Great result for the requisitioners last night. The size of the supporting vote was massive.

    One comment. From what I can see - the natives ARE organised. Last nights result didn’t just happen by itself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What are we to make of the request by Scottish Rugby for fans at Murrayfield?

    10k for the 1872 game in January and 25k at 6 Nations games.

    6N could be a possibility as the vaccination programme should be well under way.

    Can’t see 10k for the 1872 match. Given all the dire warnings from Sturgeon on getting together at Christmas and that Hogmanay is cancelled it’s to early.

    More interesting that SR have made this pitch now though. If you don’t let us have fans you need to give us cash?

    Sounds very similar to the calls from football back in the summer.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sadly, a large touch of authoritarianism has brokedn-out within the SNP. They seem to have ingested the old Scottish Labour traits of: "We ken best, so haud yer wheesht and dae whit we tell ye."

    Crowds are being allowed back to lower league games in English football, but not yet to Scottish Rugby - strange, and worrying.

    I can see no justification for not allowing fans back, and feel certain the SRU could easily accommodate up to 10,000 at Murrayfield.

    Going to 25,000 for the 6N might be dependent on how the vaccination programme goes, but, let's be hopeful.

    And, since the SRU is a NGB (national governing body) it should be able to access government money.

    The problem as I see it is - the SRU|'s management model has a small professional arm, earning the money to be distributed to the larger amateur arm. Persuading the government to fund this small arm, might be a problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting comments AA

      Agree with you in the authoritarian tendency of the Scottish Government. Our infection results aren’t any better than England’s and death rates similarly bad so any distinctive difference in approach is purely cosmetic.

      Their aversion to crowds at sports stadia is odd. Quite happy to have indoor sports like bingo but baulk at some football fans in the open air.

      With regards to the SRU getting cash from govt. what is it that the government will be funding?

      SRU have taken money from CVC and hope to sell the 6N before end of year.
      SRU ltd have negotiated a loan/overdraft with Bank of Scotland
      A large percentage of SR employees are on furlough

      It’s not for the SG to support a company’s revenue. This is about survival and that’s where the clubs come into it.

      Many clubs will have had zero income since March 23. They may have got some of the hardship funds from Murrayfield. They may also have accessed National govt grants.

      They will still have bills to pay.

      If we want these facilities to exist in the future then there needs to be a way of supporting them further.

      Delete