THE
battle lines for Saturday tea-time were more-firmly drawn this
morning, when Eddie Jones announced his England match-day squad for
the Calcutta Cup game. This, in 1-23 order, is:
Eddie Jones
1.
Mako Vunipola (Saracens), 2. Dylan Hartley (Captain),
(Northampton Saints), 3. Dan Cole (Leicester Tigers);
4. Joe Launchbury (Wasps), 5. Maro Itoje (Saracens); .
Courtney Lawes (Northampton Saints), 7. Chris Robshaw
(Harlequins), 8. Nathan Hughes (Wasps); 9. Danny
Care (Harlequins), 10. George Ford; 11. Jonny May
(both Leicester Tigers), 12. Owen Farrell (Saracens), 13.
Jonathan Joseph, 14. Anthony Watson (both Bath);
15. Mike Brown (Harlequins).
Replacements:
16. Jamie George (Saracens), 17. Joe Marler
(Harlequins), 18 Harry Williams (Exeter Chiefs), 19.
George Kruis (Saracens), 20. Sam Underhill (Bath); 21.
Richard Wigglesworth (Saracens), 22. Ben Te'o
(Worcester Warriors), 23. Jack Nowell (Exeter Chiefs).
That
is pretty-much the England squad he was expected to name; no denying,
it's a good outfit, but, it is a beatable one – because, man for
man they are not, to my mind, as good as the Scotland squad. Sure,
they are hyped to high Heaven by the English media, but, we have
players every bit as good, and in a few cases, better than, the guy
they are facing. If we can just believe, and cut down our error
count, there is no reason why we should not win.
This
England team also contains one or two penalty generators, who, if
they get on the wrong side of the excellent Mr Owens, could cost
their side dear. We are also overdue a win against the Auld Enemy,
hopefully this is the year we get it.
WHEN
I saw Peter Murchie getting involved in Ayr's pre-match warm-up prior
to their Millbrae meeting with Hawick on Saturday, I immediately knew
he would, sooner rather than later, be announced as the new Head
Coach, in succession to Calum Forrester, who has just got a new and
demanding day job with KPMG the major accountancy firm.
Incoming Ayr Coach Peter Murchie
I
certainly wish Peter well, he is taking-on a big job, but, Ayr has a
good playing organisation under Director of Rugby Jim Lymburn, and,
in Glenn Tippett and Murchie's old Warriors team mate Pat McArthur,
the forwards will continue to be well-organised, leaving Murchie to
concentrate on getting the most out of a talented and still –
Frazier Climo part, youthful back division.
There
are rumours that Grant Anderson may follow big Scott Sutherland in
deciding he has made the trip from Greenock often enough and call it
a day, but, while Scott Lyle has been outstanding whether on the
wing, at centre or at stand off this season, his best position is
full back, so, the Anderson going eventually is covered.
Murchie's
appointment is a continuation of former professionals stepping down
to coach in the Premiership. Forrester and now Murchie at Ayr, Ben
Cairns at Currie and Fin Gillies at Hawks are just a few examples of
a professional football practice, of newly-retired players getting an
immediate coaching opportunity at a high level, without doing an
apprenticeship lower down.
This
hasn't always worked in football, and there have been one or two
appointments in rugby which didn't work – Nikki Walker at Hawick
for instance. There is something to be said for learning on the job
at a lower level – as Kenny Murray did at CQP, before moving to
Ayr, or Stevie Lawrie has done, as Phil Smith's Number Two at
Heriot's, prior to moving to Watsonians – who were burned slightly
when the Marcus di Rollo – Simon Taylor pairing didn't really work
as everyone hoped it might.
With
Super Six, we may well see more occasions of players moving directly
from playing to coaching, without seemingly moving away from the top
level, to perhaps find-out what real life is all about.
Not
every great player makes a good, far less a great coach. That has
long been accepted knowledge in football, we may find Scottish Rugby
takes a wee while to discover the truth of this, as the fashion for
change from the top down, rather than the grass roots up,
increasingly takes hold at Murrayfield.
On
a linked issue, which needs talking about.
One
of the seldom discussed issues around Super Six and Agenda 3 is, the
SRU apparently wants to see fewer, but stronger clubs. Now, this, to
me is sheer stupidity. More, stronger clubs is the way forward.
Scottish
Rugby is a pyramid. At the top we have the national side; below that
the two full-time PRO14 teams and below that – the age group sides
and the Academy. That is the full time professional set-up.
Below
that, we have the club game. At the lowest level in the clubs we have
the mini-rugby sides, feeding through to the midi-rugby teams, which
is where the first break occurs, with the best young players being
hived-off onto the Performance Pathway, which leads eventually to the
Academy an the age group sides for the best – who then go on to the
two pro sides an the Scotland team.
Those
who get onto the Performance Pathway, then fall by the way side will
hopefully go back to their clubs and carry-on playing, up to
Premiership status. One or two will perhaps be late developers, and
will find their way back to the pro sides.
But,
this will only apply to a very few players, and it seems to me, all
the palaver about Super Six, all the upheaval to long-established
clubs and set-ups, to get what will, at most, be a handful of players
into the pro set-up, well, it's a sledgehammer to crack a nut, and
much ado about little or nothing.
The
SRU is over-interested in the very narrow top of the pyramid. They
are largely ignoring the bottom and the base layers. If they continue
to do this, the whole edifice is in danger of being undermined. Let's
hope we can stop this, before it is too-late.
SRU
Councillors take note – it's your constituencies which are in
danger.


If we play to our potential and cut out the unenforced errors we can win on Saturday.
ReplyDeleteWith regard to the SRUs interest in the club game that seems to be obvious from the Agenda 3 proposals ie they don’t have any!
This lack of consequential thinking is very worrying from a body tasked with the future of the game. Doubly so in they will impose this new structure with no consultation or vote by the clubs.