YESTERDAY,
I posted the result of some left-field thinking I had been doing,
when I found common ground between the UK Government's thinking and
actions over Brexit and the SRU Ayatollahs' thinking on Super 6 and
Agenda 3.
The
feedback was interesting, not least when a couple of regular
commenters pointed-out the big difference between Brexit and Super
6/Agenda 3 – which is:
The
UK people were offered a vote on Brexit (yes or no to leaving the EU),
and chose to go for it – the SRU is attempting to foist Super
6/Agenda 3 on their membership.
Fair
point, that's me telt.
Dod and Dee - CEO Mark with incoming President Dee Bradbury
ANOTHER
interesting response from my readership came with regard to my post
of a couple of days ago. Mark Dodson and the High Performance
Department at Murrayfield are very much the drivers of Super 6/Agenda
3. They clearly had the backing of the Board and the Council in
pushing this one through to the extent, they were able to announce it
at the 2017 AGM.
However,
as one of my readers pointed-out, following the 2018 AGM, they will
be faced with a different Board, where a couple of long-serving
members are due to stand down, but, more-worryingly for Murrayfield,
they may well be dealing with a Council whose membership might bear no resemblance to the current one. As my reader wrote:
“Our
Council Members may have more important things to worry about than
the Club game, as a quick scan of things shows that many are either
due to stand down or may need to seek re-election based on their
Clubs performance.
“National Leagues:
“National Leagues:
“C0LIN
RIGBY - National 1 rep - Stewarts Melville currently in one of
the National 1 relegation spots.
GRAHAM SCOTT - National 2 rep - Whitecraigs currently in the sole remaining National 2 relegation spot.
ANDY LITTLE - National 3 rep - Highland in the running for promotion from National 3.
“Should their respective Clubs change league, then the reps will probably have to seek re-election, and if someone stands against them, then they must stand down.
“If the possible jostling for position is not exciting enough at National level, then consider the regional league reps.
“According to the SRU website, for the upcoming AGM, there are to be elections for four Regional League Reps, due to existing holders completing their term in office - MIKE MONRO (North Region), JIM LITTLEFAIR (Edinburgh Region), ALAN BROWN (Borders Region) and GRAHAM KERR (Midlands Region).
“WILLIE GARDNER'S Club, Lanark, have just been removed from West 3 due to non-fulfilment of fixtures. I've had a read at the regional election rules and I'm not really sure what effect this will have on the Glasgow North constituency - but rule 4 does include this:
GRAHAM SCOTT - National 2 rep - Whitecraigs currently in the sole remaining National 2 relegation spot.
ANDY LITTLE - National 3 rep - Highland in the running for promotion from National 3.
“Should their respective Clubs change league, then the reps will probably have to seek re-election, and if someone stands against them, then they must stand down.
“If the possible jostling for position is not exciting enough at National level, then consider the regional league reps.
“According to the SRU website, for the upcoming AGM, there are to be elections for four Regional League Reps, due to existing holders completing their term in office - MIKE MONRO (North Region), JIM LITTLEFAIR (Edinburgh Region), ALAN BROWN (Borders Region) and GRAHAM KERR (Midlands Region).
“WILLIE GARDNER'S Club, Lanark, have just been removed from West 3 due to non-fulfilment of fixtures. I've had a read at the regional election rules and I'm not really sure what effect this will have on the Glasgow North constituency - but rule 4 does include this:
'require to resign with effect from the SRU AGM following such event where the event is promotion of the club, but where the event is anything other, such resignation will require to be with immediate effect.'
“This potentially leaves only ADAM GRAY (Glasgow South) and PETER LAVERIE (Premier rep) as the only "Club" reps on the Council.
“Now should, Glasgow Hawks apply for and be awarded a Super 6 franchise, where does this leave Peter Laverie as he'll be representing a Club with a commercial interest in a contract with the Union - which some may view as a conflict of interest?”
That is not all,
as another commenter below the lines pointed-out:
“Mike
Monro is also standing for the Vice President's position, so will be
further distracted.
“Mike is also from Aberdeenshire so may struggle to push the developing clubs and competitions line. Unless turning up in North 3 counts.”
“Mike is also from Aberdeenshire so may struggle to push the developing clubs and competitions line. Unless turning up in North 3 counts.”
I
have never to my knowledge met Mr Munro, I have certainly never been
introduced to him, but, he is, apparently, a lawyer. This worries me,
and with respect to m'learned friends -aye, you “Mandy”; I feel a
cull of Scottish lawyers is even-more of a necessity than any cull of
red deer in our forests.
Also,
Mr Munro's club, Aberdeenshire, is in some deep doo-dah, perhaps
extra work on rugby administration should take place closer to home
than Murrayfield. Finally, and you know how we journos love salacious
gossip – I give you the views of a weel-kent top lawyer in the
north-east on Mr Munro: “When
he first qualified he showed himself to be ludicrously incompetent,
an impression he has since added to spectacularly.”
I didn't say that, so, don't shoot the messenger, please.
Wee Beastie will be a hard act to replace
There
is also the case of vacancies on the board, in particular, a
replacement for the “Mighty Mouse”, as past Scotland captain and
SRU President Ian McLauchlan is due to step down, having completed
his maximum spell in office, and given wonderful service to Scottish
Rugby along the way.
The
Wee Man has sat as a Non-Executive Director since leaving the
Presidency and he will be a very-difficult man to replace, although,
I can think of one or two past Scotland caps and captains who, as
NEDs would be more than capable of putting the brakes on the paid
executives sitting around the table. But, would they get a look in?
Jim
Littlefair, currently a Council representative on the Board will,
presumably, since his term on the Council is due to expire, also
require to be replaced. In any case, I understand Jim is seeking support for a run at the vice-presidency.
FINALLY,
with the BBC being priced-out of PRO14 live coverage for the new
season, we are going to either, take the trouble to turn-up in person
to Edinburgh or Glasgow games, or dig deep to subsidise Irish-based
Premier TV and Sky.
No more "pennace Glasgow" next season from Hugh Dan
Would
it be too much to expect the SRU to perhaps come up with a means
whereby, through live streaming or something, those fans who cannot
afford to travel to Ireland, Italy, South Africa and Wales, could
watch the away games.
On
top of the proposals for Super 6 and Agenda 3 and their knock-on
effects of coverage of and interest in the club game, we now see a
definite threat to the rise of interest in our two PRO1 sides.



With respect to the TV deal, Murrayfield may have played a blinder here. They're in the middle of launching Super6, and have stated they would try to get TV coverage as well as a cross border competition.
ReplyDeleteWith no TV deal for the BBC, it leaves a hole in the schedule for their regional channels, so Murrayfield can now offer something to fill that gap.
A semi-pro Super 6 competition on BBC Alba would be a big draw for potential franchise funders and the alpha males of the Club game. On top of that, if they could offer a semi-pro Celtic Cup competition, this could be sold to BBC Wales and BBC Northern Ireland to help fill gaps in their schedule. The Welsh are going through a similar things as us with Super 6, so perhaps it's a joint strategy.
Pull it off, and the Unions will look like geniuses.
Any feedback from last nights Ayr super 6 meeting?
ReplyDeleteThat’s an interesting perspective pegj
ReplyDeleteThe issue for BBC Alba is that sport attracts viewers but does it really serve their core purpose?
And what would encourage viewers to the super 6 games? Just because you can’t get rugby except in satellite I will sit down and watch that competition? Bit of a stretch that one
Interesting views although I detect a hint of sarcasm possibly from pegj. In my opinion if if pro 14 goes onto satellite TV the fans could have an opportunity to watch most of the away games depending on coverage. Also it suggests a greater interest in this competition, a great opportunity to possibly double up some fixtures with Glasgow and Edinburgh A teams! Kick super six straight into touch now I can't see any broadcaster being interested in non entities. On the super six/ Agenda 3 issue I am hopeful through your blog and one or two others that the message is getting across to Club's at ALL levels that stupid six and Agenda3 will have serious consequences for Club rugby in Scotland. As I have previously stated the Council and Board should hang their heads in shame for trying to force this through unconstitutionally. As for Monroe and Littlefair standing for Vice President that just adds insult to injury. The Council have not considered their constituents merely succumbed to the wishes of Dodson and Co. On the Council turnover I think Adam Gray should be up for election too. !
ReplyDeleteThe more time passes, the more I fear Super6 and it's knock-on effect on the rest of grassroots rugby is going to happen. Too many Club folks and their reps think it doesn't affect them.
ReplyDeleteFolk in West are worried about Clubs being removed from the league due to unfulfilled fixtures, not realising that this is the thin end of the wedge, and such things will pick up speed as Agenda 3 cleanses those Clubs who don't meet Murrayfields predetermined ideal.
Raise a query about Clubs struggling to put out u16 and u18s and you're told "it might just be a blip, but there's good stuff happening at Primary 7".
Ask about community Clubs potentially losing players to bigger Clubs who will look to make up numbers due to things like strict amateurism and "it doesn't really affect us at this level", whilst Super 6 is just about the Academy players so also won't have an impact.
Apart from trying to rekindle memories of a bygone era, what does Agenda 3 actually do. I can't see how the project will address real issues such as player recruitment & retention, facilities, volunteers and growing the game within communities, never mind immediate things such as GDPR and player insurance.
But hear, what do I know, I'm the one that's off on the wrong track.
Talk of lame ducks and getting rid of the dead wood is all well & good, but if we've got the wrong roadmap, it doesn't matter how many people are removed.
I wholeheartedly agree pegj but by the time the Clubs realise how far of course we are with these proposals we will be past the point of no return. Agenda 3 and stupid 6 are elitist detrimental to a flourishing Club game and potentially the final nail in the coffin of some of our smaller Clubs.
ReplyDelete