IN
THIS morning's
Scotland on Sunday Iain
Morrison penned what I can only describe as a pool of pish about the
new Celtic Cup (the Under-23/A team competition for Irish Provincial
and Welsh Regional shawdow squads), and why Edinburgh and Glasgow are
not involved.
Iain Morrison - seems loathe to criticise Murrayfield
“Morry”
has been a largely uncritical by-stander over the past year of
turmoil and disagreement over Stupid-6, a stance he maintains here.
Although, to be fair, I think even he realises it is not the answer,
but, he cannot bring himself to criticise the Fat Controller and the
Murrayfied Minions.
Let's
be honest, there are enough young players inside the SRU Performance
Department that they could have been involved. You have to ask
yourself, why were they not? That is the question Morry ought to have
been demanding Murrayfield answer.
For
a start, there are 26 of last season's SRU Academy players listed as
“full-time” (if we discount Matt Fagerson, who is now capped),
that leaves 25. Add to that the 9 members of last season's Scotland
Under-20 squad who are listed as Stage II “Academy-supported”
players, and you have 34 players. Add the “fringe” Glasgow and
Edinburgh professionals who are Under-23, and the younger members of
the Scotland 7s squad, who are available now during the Sevens
“off-season”, and there are enough players to determine - there
could (subject to Irish and Welsh agreement) have been Edinburgh and
Glasgow squads involved in the Celtic Cup.
Robbie Nairn, here scoring for Ayr, one Under-23 professional who might have benefitted from playing in the Celtic Cup
But,
for some unfathomable reason, the SRU is unwilling to go down that
route. When the WRU set-up their Regional Under-23 Academies, the
squads which will play in the Celtic Cup, they made it clear: they
saw the best way to develop their young players was over a structured
season.
They
will come-off pre-season, more or less straight into the Celtic Cup,
after which, they will return to training blocks – concentrated
strength & conditioning work, and skills work before going back
to playing games. All this done under the supervision of the regional
academy staff.
The
SRU approach of having the Academy players and the fringe
professionals alternating between s&c and skills work, while
fitting-in sessions with the Premiership clubs to which they are
aligned, well it all seems, for want of a better phrase – a wee bit
amateurish and haphazard.
The
SRU player development method has still, however, worked quite well
over the past decade. In the
last ten years, 285 Players have been selected for the Scotland
Under-20 teams for either the Under-20 6Nations, or the Under-20
World Cup. These young players are, by definition, the cream of
Scotland's young talent, and they have reached that status by coming
up through the Player Pathway system.
The
great majority of these young players were developed via the Scottish
Rugby Academy, although, some of them, coming through the “Exiles”,
now the “Scotland Qualified” programme, have learned their rugby
at Engish club rugby academies.
Of
these 285 young players, 36 have gone on to be capped, this
represents 13% going on to the highest level. A further 12 have gone
on to win “lesser” caps: Tomaso Allen switched to Italy and is
now a regular in their international side; George Hunter opted to
reresent the Bahamas, while the other ten have won either Scotland A
or Scotland 7s “caps”.
An
additional 33 players (12%) have gone on to secure contracts with
either Edinburgh and Glasgow, while a further 26 (9%) have won
contracts with English club sides.
So,
in total 108 Under-20 internationalists (38% of the total number
capped) have “trained-on” to become professional rugby players.
To
be fair to the hard-working coaches and players in the Academy
system, that 38% figure is only a snap-shot, since the players from
the 2016 to 2018 squads are, in truth, still very-much learning their
trade. Sure, Matt Fagerson, Adam Hastings and Blair Kinghorn have
already won caps, but they are the exceptions. If we look only at
those players who are now older than 23, the picture is a bit better,
with 48% having at least got as far as to hav earned full
professional contracts.
The Fagerson brothers, both broke through very early-on in their careers
That
is actually a very-good percentage of players coming through. I
believe it is fair to say, the notion of a career as a professional
rugby player is still fairly new. We are not yet at the stage where –
as is the case with football - teenaged boys, as early as 12 or 13
have their hearts set on a career in the game. In fact, I would
suggest, a good percentage of those players capped at Under-20 level
have their career designs set elsewhere.
For
them, while playing international age group rugby is enjoyable, they
may well be at university and aiming instead for a career in one of
the professions. Take that into consideration, and a 48% conversion
rate from age group honours into a professional career is a very-good
figure.
By
the time these young players win their Under-20 caps, they have been
through the selection mill. The sifting starts at Under-15 level with
the first player pathway games; then it is on through the age groups
– Under-16/17/18/19 to the big push with the Under-20s. Al the
time, they are being watched and assessed in the Youth and Schools
Conferences, so, by the time the Under-20 squad is picked, there can
be few young players whose potential is not known to the SRU
Performance Department coaches.
Therefore,
the chances of anyone suddenly emerging from left field is, to say
the least, remote. Indeed, looking through the names of the 285
Under-20 caps in the last decade, I can think of only three players –
Fraser Brown, Jamie Bhatti and George Turner, who dropped out of the
professional ranks, back to being club players, then fought their way
back.
I
can accept, therefore, the SRU Performance Department's desire to see
a level of rugby at which the players who have come up the Pathway to
Under-20 level but are not immediately ready to play their full part
in Edinburgh's and Glasgow's season. But, in truth, S6 is unlikely to
throw many new names into the mix. And it is certainly not going to be "Domestic" Rugby.



But Iains best line is "every penny spent on Super 6 means less money for the pro-teams".
ReplyDeleteDo you think he realises that Super 6 has been deemed part of Domestic Rugby, so in reality, despite it having a performance rugby remit, every penny spent on Super 6 means less money for grassroots rugby.
I didn’t take the same exception to the article as you did AA.
ReplyDeleteAs pegj says Iain did say S6 would deprive domestic rugby of much needed funds. I also note his comment that the SRU could join in the future.
It really does come down to what S6 sides are. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck....