APPARENTLY,
I
have “sold out” and become Super-6's biggest cheer-leader; I am
now in the pay of the SRU (I wish); and I have also committed several
other crimes against Scottish Rugby, or more-correctly, the Aye Been
tendancy in the game. So, can we settle one or two things:
- Super-6 is happening. That battle is over.
- IF the Super-6 clubs do try to recruit from surrounding clubs, for their “amateur” sides; they are more-likely to be going after promising young players than established first team players with that lower club.
- Movement between the Super-6 clubs and the rest will be a two-way street.
- Perhaps not immediately, but, certainly within the next five to ten years, you will see clubs wishing to enter the National Leagues and the Premiership being required to meet minimum standards of infrastructure.
- The Establishment “won” a last week's SGM, and some of the “Rebels” still have not stopped squealing: Don't get mad – get even is always a good plan in such circumstances.
- The Rebels can always have another go, at the AGM, but, I would suggest, second time around, they prepare and fight better than they did last week.Gavin MacColl QC - paid to win cases, not friends
- The way some of the Establishment behaved, I have seen Robert Howat and Gavin MacColl QC coming in for some criticism. Come on, those two are lawyers – a breed with a tendancy to think they are smarter than the rest of us. And MacColl is an advocate, he's paid to win cases, not win friends.
- Internal squabbles are part of life for every national sporting body. Forcing through change is never easy, since the Establishment in each body sets the rules and laws down the laws of engagement when change is threatened.
- This means, if you want to change things, you have to work smarter (and harder) than the Establishment.
- Speaking of Murrayfield acions to get annoyed about. Never mind last week's SGM, it's in the past – get worked-up about this suggestion of the SRU taking some £750,000 of OUR money – that's potential funding for your club and mine, and spending it on an American rugby club that has yet to play a game.
- Now that is something to get upset about.
I
SEE yesterday's
outbreak of English Exceptionalism – the RFU reportedly being
totally agin World Rugby's plans for this World League: because
England feared relegation from the Six Naions – has been booted
into touch by Steve Tew, the big boss of New Zealand Rugby.
Perhaps
World Rugby should exempt the RFU in the northern hemisphere, and the
NZRU in the southern, from the normal rules of the proposed World
League. They do this because, England is the nation everyone wants to
beat, so, as “the Common Enemy,” they have to be in there in the
north.
New
Zealand, as the benchmark for excellence has to be in the top-flight
in the south, so everyone else has something to measure themselves
against. But, I don't see either argument washing.
I
reckon old Nigel Melville's comments, and Nigel is, after only, only
temporary CEO of the RFU, are just another example of English
Exceptionalism, being picked-up by the compliant London media.
We're
in the age of professionalism, if the money from the World league
shouts loudly enough, the RFU will sign -up.
THEY
DON'T LIKE my
old mucker Stephen Jones in New Zealand, or in Australia, or South
Africa – and even in some parts of his native Wales; but the bold
Jonesie, known for the duration of this item as: 'Jones the Hack,' to
differentiate him from another of that eclan, doesn't give a toss
about popularity competitions.
'Jones the Hack' - a brilliant put-down of 'Jones the Twat'
But,
he has earned Brownie Points in Auckland, Wellington and points south
this week, with a brilliant tweet about another Jones – Eddie of
that ilk, referred to here as: 'Jones the Twat.'
'Jones
the Twat' has, apparently, ruled himself out of being the next Lions'
coach, because he doesn't apparently fancy eight weeks in a blazer
being a diplomat.
This
“news” brought a wonderful twitter response from 'Jones the
Hack,' who tweeted:
“Eddie's
ruled himself out of a job he wasn't going to be asked to do anyway -
that's some connundrum, even by Eddie's standards.
On that basis, I can confirm I'm ruling myself out of the job as the next Pope.”
On that basis, I can confirm I'm ruling myself out of the job as the next Pope.”
I
also liked, although it wasn't as good a reposte, the tweet from BBC
Scotland's rent-a-quote, Tom English, which read:
“This
is like a wee 59-year old guy ruling himself out of a night of
passion with Beyoncé.”
THE
ROW about
recruitment of
promising
schoolboys to some of the leading rugby-playing schools in New
Zealand is rumbling on. Earlier this year St Kenigern's (the other
name by the way for St Mungo, the patron saint of Glasgow) Auckland,
was told by another ten of the top-ranked A1 schools in the Auckland
area that they would not play them, because: whereas the other ten
schools had only driven a D8 bulldozer through the recruitment rules,
St Kent's had apparently used the larger D11.
But,
peace has broken-out, St Kent's has agreed not to use the
dubiously-recruited players for the opening six rounds of his
season's competition, while the two boys considered to be the worst
cases of rules violation, will not be playing in the semi-final and
final, should St Kent's get there.
I
wonder how this news might affect one or two of Scotland's leading
rugby-playing schools, who have been accused of being rather too-free
and easy when it comes to offering scholarships to promising young
players.
RUGBY
FORWARDS are
sometimes referred to as: “piano shifters,” while backs are
“piano players.” The Edinburgh forwards might find themselves, in
the near future, getting-in some genuine practice, if not in shiting
pianos, but maybe furniture.
Douglas Struth - picture courtesy of SNS/Scottish Rugby
I
mention this because Douglas Struth, currently Head of Legal with the
SRU, has oday been announced as the new Managing Director of
Edinburgh Rugby.
I
have never met Douglas, but, from the brief CV which is on this
morning's announcement of his new role, I would say he has a chance
of being a successful MD.
But,
his new job gives Richard Cockerill a great chance to get his pack
working as one, moving all Douglas's stuff – his desk, personal
files and so on, from his current office to his new one. Then there
will be the need to get whoever replaces him as Head of Legal
installed.
One
thing I will say for the SRU, if you can get onto their gravy train,
you get looked after. When it comes to re-arranging deck chairs,
Murrayfield could give the White Star Line, owners of the Titanic,
lessons in how to do it.



Holy bloggers!
ReplyDeleteIt's true - the SRU's Ayrshire sleeper has been activated....
Run! Run folks!! Run from this place immediately - before the bugger gets at you, too.....
Super 6 is happening, shame it's being financed from the domestic rugby budget, despite it being under the control of the Performance Rugby department - I wonder if the competition will be under the remit the Championship Committee, in the same way as other community rugby competitions.
ReplyDeleteI don't have a problem with Super 6 - just the way it's been handled - it's a grab for both power and budget, with the losers being the Clubs - the stakeholders of the Union.
You've drawn comparison in the past between Super 6 & Brexit, and there are indeed similarities, not least the fact that our elected representatives and the Executive employed to do the best for the stakeholders have now proven they have little respect for the wishes and concerns of those stakeholders (the Clubs).
But hey, what goes around, comes around.
p.s. what's your opinion about professional players playing in competitive games against "strictly amateur" players - just a wee issue which our masters have still to clarify?
DeleteRugby Union is an Open game. Enforcing a strictly amateur tier of the game will prove to be impossible. It may also, if challenged prove to be illegal.
DeleteThere are currently players with NL1 teams being paid, perhaps not as highly as Premiership players, or as highly as S6 players will be.
But, if an S6 player plays down into the Premiership or NL, they will be facing players who are also paid.
The game may be open, but if Clubs want to take part in Union based competitions, run by the Championship Committee, then they must abide by their rules, which appear to be moving towards all players below the premiership must be striclty amatuer.
DeleteOf course, Clubs could decide not to take part in SRU competitions, and play in their own competitions, paying players in the process, but then I'm guessing they would be ineligible for SRU participation payments.
This is where life gets very interesting. As mr McCall stayed on Friday. The S6 docs and franchise info were purely indicative and not legal texts. Therefore the SRU are free to make up any rules they like no matter what was published previously.
DeleteSo my prediction
The amateurs v paid player shalll not meet clause will be dropped
Clubs will be free to pay players but must do so transparently and within HMRC terms
Club officials will have to sign in blood that they will stick to this. How this is policed is anyone’s guess.
We will need to wait and see the details of S6 Fixtures, where the spare players will play and “dual registration” Those details will dictate what the next steps are.
I’m with pegj on this one. Rolling over and getting our tummy tickled by the execs and board seems to work for most clubs. I hope we don’t come to regret this move.
According to The Offside Line, Prem and national 1 Clubs have agreed that they will not allow Super 6 players to play to their level - wonder how happy the franchise holders are with that.
DeleteSadly, AA - your goose is now cooked, having morphed into an apologist for the indefensible.
ReplyDelete