I
HAVE long
held, during my many years at the coal face, covering sport, that of
the various forms of football: American, Association, Australian
Rules, Canadian, Gaelic, Rugby League and Rugby Union – just to
name the most-popular, Association Football is the purest version,
the most free-form.
All
the rest have artificial breaks built into the Laws: the American
“downs” system, Rugby League's six tackle law, Union's scrums and
lines out. In Association Football, (hereafter in this post to be
referred to as simply “football”) in theory, it is possible for
there to be non-stop action for the full 45 minutes of a half. Of
course it never happens, we have fouls, and the subsequent
free-kicks, corner and goal kicks, but, in theory, you could see
non-stop whistle to whistle action in any half of a football match.
So,
that is why I have always argued, given its free-form, football ought
to be the most-closely policed form of the game. Football match
officials and authorities should come down harder on malpractices and
foul play than in any of the other forms of the basic game of kicking
a ball around.
Sadly,
they don't. Indeed, it could be argued that, in modern football,
virtually anything goes. Very rare indeed is it to hear a manager
say: “Aye, he deserved that red card,” when one of his players is
sent off for foul play. No, at the very least the boss will produce
half a dozen, usually outrageous claims as to why the red card should
have stayed in the referee's pocket.
“Auchinleck Laws: “Nae bluid or broken
leg – nae foul.”
If
it was up to the professionals, there would never be a foul awarded.
Mind you, if like me you cut your footballing teeth in the East
Ayrshire Coalfields, you would be familiar with this protocol -
“Auchinleck Laws” we call it, basically: “Nae bluid or broken
leg – nae foul.”
I
put this institutionalised disinclination to properly police the game
down to professionalism – when money becomes involved, strict
adherence to the laws goes out the window, it's every man for
himself, seeking whatever advantage, legal or illegal, that can be
had.
Even
more sadly – this attitude is creeping ever more into rugby.
Football might have been allowing professionalism for some 130 years,
but, in the quarter century or so since Rugby Union recognised
professionalism some nefarious football practices have crept into the
game.
One
of the latest sneaky wee tricks to come into football has been the
stealing of millimetres at a corner. I have only started to notice
this in the last couple of seasons, but, whereas, when I was playing
at school, we had to place the ball on the painted or sawdust
quadrant around the corner flag when taking a corner, today, the ball
is always placed outside that quadrant for a corner.
It
began on the unpoliced side – since assistant referees as we must
now call linesmen, only patrol half the length of the park. But,
increasingly, I see millimetres, inches even being stolen, when an AR
is standing there, supposedly supervising. And they are getting away
with it.
But,
we in Rugby need not be so holier than thou about this. Have you
looked at how penalty kicks from hand are policed in our game today?
It used to be when a penalty was awarded, the referee would indicate
the mark, where the penalty was to be taken from. The kicker then had
to start from behind that mark, and kick the ball more or less
through an imaginary vertical line above it, otherwise, his side lost
possession to a scrum to the opposition.
Can
anyone tell me when it was decided to ignore this law? Because,
today, the mark indicated by the referee is usually interpreted as
the starting point for the run-up prior to kicking, and a good
practitioner can easily, and without censure, gain some five or more
metres before kicking.
Now,
I might be an old reactionary, but, this conduct is contrary to the
ethos of the game, and really should be stamped-out.
And
it is not the only area of Rugby where standards have not so much
fallen as been done away with.
Perhaps
the most-obvious repudiation of the laws is at scrum time, where
scrum-halves “feeding” the ball in some cases directly to the
feet of their own second row, happens at almost every scrum. It's
wrong, it is cheating, but, the authorities condone it – why?
Then
there is the offside law. How often, at the breakdown – I could not
embellish some of the piles-up of bodies after the tackle as “rucks”
- do you see the defending side yards offside in midfield.
Now,
the Assistant Referees, as touch judges are now known, are meant to
police this. In my experience they seldom do. Yet, this would be so
easy to sort out.
We need to see football's offside signal brought into rugby
Simply
instruct the ARs to do what their football cousins do, and stick
their flags up in the air when someone strays offside. A spate of
offside penalties in a game and we might see fewer instances of what
is called “line speed,” the situation where a 19 stone prop
covers ten metres faster than Usain Bolt at his peak could have
managed, to tackle an opponent.
There is no way whereby Joe Marler is faster over ten metres than
If
that happened, we might see a better, faster, more-open game, with
more tries.
This guy
Another
blot on Rugby Union's landscape about which I have blogged before is
the scrum – away from the blatant crooked feeding. I would make it
a law that, other than at a five-metre scrum, the side winning
possession had to get the ball out immediately – thereby stopping
the current practice of “milking” penalties.
I
love a pushover try as much as any former forward, but the way sides
who are in the scrum ascendancy hold the ball in to try to win a
penalty, that grates. Mind you, advancing this argument goes somewhat
against the grain for me. In my first game, as a 15-year-old hooker,
for Cumnock against Ayr A2s, at the Old Racecourse in Ayr, I had a
scrum which today, 57 years later, I can still remember.
Our
stand-off kicked straight out at the start of the second half; scrum
back on half-way, Ayr put-in. I nicked it against the head – to be
fair, the local Ayrshire legend that was Sam Muff, my opposing hooker, skinned me
something like 12-1 in that match, but, enjoy your small triumphs eh!
We
held the ball at the back and marched that Ayr pack backwards until,
padded posts being unheard of back then, Tom Gilchrist the Ayr number
eight, found himself with a post jammed between his arse cheeks, only
then did we let the ball out – for our inside centre to
knock-on!!!!
My
suggestion about immediately releasing the ball would negate such
scrum dominance, but, to be fair, we weren't trying to win a penalty,
we were going as far as we could.



Reffing the game as per the current laws could make things far more open and free flowing, especially around the breakdown - you've mentioned offside, I'd add to that the bit about staying on your feet.
ReplyDeleteHowever, one innovation I would introduce from soccerball is the refs use of the marker spray - use it at penatly & free kicks and line outs to monitoring closing the gap.
Excellent point about the marker spray Paul, I forgot to mention that. Mind you, that spray vanishes after a minute or so. I could see a referee in some professional games using up a full can over two scrums.
Delete