FUBAR is a situation familiar to all ex-Servicemen; it is an acronym, allegedly first dreamed-up by a United States Army General, which has since passed into general military use. It means: Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition.
I am not saying the FORSOC SUPER6 is a classic case of FUBAR, but, I maintain my long-held conviction, it's going to take major surgery to sort out the faults. But, FUBAR also refers to the SRU's handling of the “performance” arm of the game, certainly when it comes to young player development. Here we have real problems.
I have spent the past couple of days looking at our Under-20 squad which faced and lost to Italy on Friday night. Our 23-man squad splits as follows:
Full-time professionals with one of the SRU clubs – Jed Gelderbloom
Full-time Stage III SRU Academy players – Michael Jones, Max Williamson, Rhys Tait, Ross McKnight, Christian Townsend, Rudi Brown
SRU Regional Academy players – Gregor Scougall, Duncan Munn, Andy Stirrat, Callum Norris, Thomas Glendinning, Kieran Clark
Not supported but playing in Super6 rugby – Ben Evans
Not supported but playing in the Premiership – Gregor Hiddleston, Tim Brown, Ali Rodger
Playing outside Scotland – Ross McClintock, Murray Redpath, Josh Taylor, Matt Deehan, Duncan Hood, Innes Hill.
So, only 13 of the 23 players are SRU-funded. What do we expect from this support? The Stage III Academy players are all attached to S6 clubs, this is supposed to be the tier which bridges the gap between the Premiership (which Murrayfield insists, when it comes to player development, is not fit for purpose) and the full-time professional sides.
Well here are the playing times for the Stage III players, in Super6 in 2021. Remember, the 2021 S6 season began on 30 July, and finished on 10 October, each player could play in a possible 11 games.
Michael Jones (Heriot's): 2 starts (53min, 55 min); 1 subs appearance (10 min); 1 sub appearance on-loan to Boroughmuir (24 min) - total playing time: 142 minutes
Max Williamson (Stirling County): 3 starts (60 min, 65 min, 80 min); 1 sub appearance (25 min) – total playing time: 230 minutes
Rhys Tait (Boroughmuir Bears): 7 starts (59 min, 55 min, 80 min, 55 min, 80 min, 80 min, 80 min); 2 sub appearances off bench (26 min, 17 min) – total playing time: 532 minutes
Ross McKnight (Stirling County): no starts; 2 sub appearances off the bench (27 min, 20 min) – total playing time: 47 minutes
Christian Townsend (Ayrshire Bulls): 3 starts (80 min, 60 min, 46 min); 3 sub appearances off the bench (18 min, 27 min, 40 min) – total playing time: 271 minutes
Rudi Brown (Watsonians) 0 starts; 0 subs appearances off the bench – total playing time 0 minutes
The Super6 season comprised 11 games, within that period 30 July – 10 October – a total possible playing time of 880 minutes. Only one of the six players, Rhys Tait, managed to play more than half the match playing time. Only Tait and Christian Townsend even got on the park in more than half the games.
If you divided the playing time out equally between the six players, you find each played under three full games in the 11-game season.
Another two players, Boroughmuir Bears' Duncan Munn and Southern Knights' Kieran Clark are on Regional Academy deals with the SRU. I don't know what this level of player support entails, but, they are tied to S6 clubs so the SRU must have some degree of say in how they train and play.
Munn, the breakthrough player of the year, managed six starts for the Bears; accruing 478 minutes of playing time. Clark, who had a terrible time with injuries, managed one start for the Knights, playing 50 minutes, and three subs appearances off the bench, for 6, 26 and 10 minutes respectively – a total playing time of 92 minutes.
Jed Gelderbloom, who is a full-timer with Edinburgh, made five appearances as an off the bench sub for Heriot's in S6, totting-up 104 minutes' playing time.
OK, these Academy and supported players, along with the other three non-supported players from Premiership clubs, were supposed to get game time in the Premiership between the end of the S6 season and the start of the Under-20 Six Nations.
We were never told which players would be involved, which clubs they would be drafted to, or if they were to be guaranteed game time in the Premiership. The whole thing was a bit hit and miss, just like the entire young player development programme. If the Premiership is not fit for purpose when it comes to player development, what was the reasoning behind offering young players game time there?
One thing is certain, the players were badly under-cooked for international rugby.
IF Super Rugby is to be a development tier, then the SRU really needs to tighten-up on the rules around it. Too many players, both full-time Academy players and “fringe” full-time professionals are not getting enough game time. Also, some S6 clubs – who we should never forget are doing the SRU a favour by taking some of the financial risk in employing semi-professional players – seem to be recruiting more-experienced players, in order to win the thing, at the expense of their player development role.
IF they are to be expected to develop Academy players, then these players surely need to be guaranteed game time. Each of the six franchises has supposedly had five Academy players drafted to them. Why not insist, if they are fit, they start and, unless injured they get at least half a game each. The two professional outfits should also identify a certain number of “fringe” players, perhaps Under-23, who should also be guaranteed game time for an S6 outfit, to keep them match-sharp.
FOSROC
Nothing develops players faster than game time – our supposed top young talent does not appear to be getting enough time on the grass – this failing must be sorted, otherwise, we are going to continue to go backwards at a rate of knots.
Once again you have produced an excellent article backed by interesting statistics . As you say Super 6 has done very little for the potential young stars trying to get the playing time that will take them to Pro and international rugby . From my stats on Super 6 matches Townsend , Tait and Munn were the only current u20 players to make the team of the week over the 10 match season and ONLY ONCE . As you say the Super 6 clubs preferred to fill their sides with more " experienced" players , many of whom were English , Welsh , Irish or colonial " mercenaries looking for a quick buck and a shop window place to attract future employers eg Pittman to Jersey Reds , Yantini to Benetton , Minogue to Rotherham. I believe many of the " Scottish " players are now giving up Super 6 - we shall see in the teams for the next set of Super 6 matches!
ReplyDeletePersonally I think we should pull the plug on Super 6 , ideally from the start of the next 2022-23 season .
I would then look to putting a Glasgow and Edinburgh u23 side into the Premiership from the currently bloated G and E squads include Academy players and some of the 180 redundant SQP Super 6 players.
This would raise the standard of competition and play in the Premiership , give valuable game time to young potential Pros and be a precursor to setting up a third Pro side in 2023-24
All interesting AA.
ReplyDeleteTwo wee queries about your player listings.
Has Gelderbloom ever been confirmed on a full contract at Edinburgh? I thought he had been brought into the Academy to replace Matt Currie who moved up to a full contract.
Also I believe Ben Evans is a Stage 3 Academy player.
Two further points.
I have been a bigger supporter of the SRU youth development than most - if we are producing the likes of Darge, Dobie, McLean, Smith and Boyle we are doing something right.
But, as someone supportive in general, it shocked me to realise that the only centre capped at Under 20 level and at full level out of the last TEN under 20 teams, apart from Rory Hutchinson, is Mark Bennett, and the only loose head capped at
both levels is Jamie Bhatti. So if you pick a team of full Scotland caps from those who have played Scotland U20 you have to go back to 2013 to complete your XV. That is not good. There are clearly some gaps in our player development.
Secondly, I notice in the latest U18 squad a number of players have been noted as being in FOSROC Stage 1 or 2, who have never been formally announced, so presumably a new lot of players is not enlisted for supported in the Academy. This, of course, is to be expected since it is 18 months since we last had a list of regionally supported players announced. But I wonder if the Stage 3 group might also be a flexible group now - for example will it be the same 30 players who were drafted to the six Super 6 teams for the sprint series, as played in the last season, or could we have new list of 30 before then?