YESTERDAY'S
big
rugby news was Ayr president Billy McHarg's support for Sean Lineen's
appointment to head-up the player development side of the Stupid-6
franchise system. However, Billy's support for Sean, in an interview
with The Hootsmon's Duncan Smith, was hardly what my old mate, former
Herald Diary Editor Tam Shields used to describe as a: “haud me
back moment.”
A smiling Billy McHarg - but, the war hasn't properly begun yet
Neither
did Duncan's story, nor Billy's intervention, constitute old William
Randolph Hearst's definition of “News” - something someone doesn't
want you to know; nope, it should definitely be filed under Hearst's alternative definition – advertising.
Nobody,
not even that old fart down there in East Ayrshire, who has been the
most-consistent and vociferous opponent of Stupid-6, will complain
about Sean getting the performance overseeing gig around S6. I can
think of no better, or better-qualified man for the job.
The
worry for me is the fact Stevie Gemmell has been given the
“Operational Director” job – he's the guy who has to make the
damned thing work.
[If
I can make one of my wee off-topic meanders here, bear with me. Back
in my youth, when my auld faither was a high heid yin with the NCB in
Ayrshire, he always maintained there were three signs of imminent
closure for a pit: they did up the baths, then then painted the
manager's office, and Fred Wilson was assigned as manager. Fred was
an excellent manager of collieries, who could, allegedly bring back
to the surface more still-useable equipment than any other pit
manager.]
Stvie Gemmell - if he gets a new job, then the SRU has problems in that area that he has to fix
In
Scottish rugby, when Murrayfield gives Stevie Gemmell a new gig, it
is a sure sign, that particular initiative is in trouble. Of course,
that S6 is in trouble is, again, not news. It was an unplanned
pregnancy, conceived during a “knee-trembler” round the back of
the building during an agm. It has come at a time of “welfare
cuts”: “sorry lads, there's no money for your 3G/4G pitches.”
And with the squeeze on budgets of potential sponsors, due to Brexit
uncertainties, and the immediate future looking gloomy, the last
thing the “parents” – the core clubs – need, is another
expensive mouth to feed.
Take
Billy McHarg's Ayr for instance. Billy made a point during his
interview of making it clear, Ayr RFC has a history going back to
1897 that he will not jeopardise; good for him. Ayr actually could
and should do well out of S6. They will, all being well, move out of
the charming but somewhat delapidated Millbrae for a new home at the
Dam Park. Millbrae is an absolute prime location for housing, so, if
they get the expected several millions for the site for upmarket
housing, they will be able to do-up Dam Park and have a terrific new
home.
But,
Ayr depends heavily for its sponsorship support on the vibrant
Ayrshire agricultural sector, over which Brexit is looming. I have
spoken to one or two weel-kent farming supporters of the club, and
Rabbie's words have been quoted to me more than once: “An furrit
tho' Ah canna see, Ah guess and fear.”
A
Hard Brexit will be very-hard on the six new comers, trying to make
their way and seeking support in sectors liable to be hard hit by its
effects.
And
that's before we get round to tackling the several anomalies of this
“camel” of a new set-up – they simply will not go away any time
soon.
The
six franchise organisations want to be allowed to run their new
super-duper league as the highest level of the domestic game – even
though S6 has been driven by the Performance Department from
conception, and has a Performance Department insider installed as
“Performance Director”, and another Performance Department
insider as “Operational Director”.
But,
they want their “core” amateur clubs to be allowed to continue to
play as National League clubs. In effect they want their
second XVs to be immediately promoted to National League status. Or do they?
Some – yes you Mr Dalgetty – are insisting, the “core” club
will continue, it is the franchise which is “new”.
Mike Dalgetty - Melrose will continue
Well,
let me see. The franchises will be considered to be the highest level
of the Domestic game – how did they reach this lofty status?
Did
these new entities: “Ayr Raiders”, “Boroughmuir Bears”,
Heriot's Highlanders”, “Melrose Marauders”, “Stirling
Stallions” and Watsonians Warriors” start, as every other new
club in Scottish rugby for the last nearly 50 years has – by
entering the lowest level of the regional leagues and – as Currie
Chieftains have so-emphatically demonstrated it is possible to do,
battled through to the top flight; winning promotion after promotion
until they got there?
Well
no actually. They have got there – to the highest level of the
Domestic game - by being the chosen ones in an SRU-arranged beauty
competition, over which there have been allegations of judging bias
and a lack of transparency, not forgetting a quick wee bit of
goal-post moving mid-match.
Add
a wee bit of financial “doping” via the SRU's stake in each
franchise, and it stinks to high heaven.
I
appreciate the circumstances are not the same, but, the last time a
couple of Scotland's leading clubs decided it would be a good idea to
form a new “super club” at the top end, these two clubs: Glasgow
Academicals and Glasgow High-Kelvinside, were forced to go back to
the lowest level in the Glasgow District Leagues, leaving the
combined club – Glasgow Hawks at the top level.
This
“Glasgow Hawks Precedent” cannot be ignored, to suit the whims of
Ayr, Boroughmuir, Heriot's, Melrose, Stirling County and Watsonians.
And, as was demonstrated at the agm, The Fat Controller cannot simply
do his Jean-Luc Picard impression and say “Make it so.” The other
clubs have the final say as to where the six “core” clubs will
play.
S6
is a “Domestic Rugby” league, therefore, it needs the formal
permission of the existing clubs before it can begin. The new league
has to meet existing strictures. So, it will be up to the existing
clubs as to where the six core clubs play.
The
only way I can see that the SRU can get S6 running the way they want
it, will be for them to admit the reality of the situation – S6 is
part of Performance Rugby, and for them to fund it properly and take
it out of “Domestic Rugby.”
The six franchises' Director of Strategy
If
TFC and the Minions continue to insist – it is part of Domestic
Rugby, then, they are at the mercy of the other clubs – it's a case
of six v a couple of hundred, and I don't think even Spartacus,
Leonadis or the guys at Rorke's Drift would have fancied those odds.
So,
dear old Billy McHarg might be impressed by how things have gone this
far, and by the union of the six franchises. Well he should be, the
fighting hasn't started yet, and, this one will not be all over by
Christmas.




Well argued piece AA
ReplyDeleteI think you are on stronger ground with the argument about domestic v Performace and I fully agree that S6 is a part of Performace rugby. All the current pr noise amply illustrates that.
As I’ve said before - I’m not sure that the Hawks protocol comes into play here. It is a new competition so differing rules could apply - IF it goes to performance rugby then no problem. In domestic rugby I see troubles ahead.
Let’s just think this through - the amateur side will play in a national league as yet undecided but desire of Nat 1. We don’t know the playing strength that this team will have so it suggests a level of finger crossing that it will be all right in the night.
We don’t even have to look at Hawks. What about RHC? That club imploded after the High School bods tired of the arrangement, fatally undermined the club and went off to form their own side Barnton playing in East 2. Their first season was characterised by average points for of 90. They conceded around 8 points per match. And that was before they went into a play off league where they again trounced everybody.
I see they have now renamed themselves as Royal High RFC.
Where were the safety considerations for the other teams? Their top score was 131! Though to be fair several sides racked up over 100 points per game
The Super 6 debate is finished. The franchise organizations now need to make it work with the SRU. I think you will find all the Super 6 teams have their finances confirmed and Brexit scaremongering is a distraction.
ReplyDeleteAlistair Munro - I admire the way S6 zealots such as Billy McHarg and your good self are talking-up this concept. However, the debate is far from over, and if you think otherwise, you are deluding yourself.
ReplyDeleteIF the SRU had put S6 under the Performance Department, as they should, the debate would be over. However, if they wish it to be under the Domestic Rugby Department, then the other clubs, not S6 have the final say in where they play, and, more-importantly where their associate "core" clubs play. That right was re-affirmed at the recent agm, so, the debate will continue.
As for Brexit, not scaremongering, that is a disaster waiting to happen which will affect everything.
However, S6 has been mishandled from the start, so, why change things now.
Dear Alistair. given that no one knows what will happen post Brexit and its impact on a variety of business sectors from Farming to Finance, indeed the latest SRU Accounts note a softening in the Corporate Sponsorship sector, Aristotle makes a valid point. Your insight that all the 6 franchises have their finances confirmed is remarkable knowledge that only someone deep inside the process could possibly know. All the more remarkable given the shaky financial ground at least 2 of the S6 Franchises were on prior to the announcement of S6.
ReplyDelete