SRU Trustee Rob Flockhart, as then President of the Union, said after the 2017 agm that there had been a lot of “noise” from the floor of the meeting. This “noise” was the ordinary clubs flexing their muscles against a blatant Establishment power grab.
Rob Flockhart - any "noise" he heard this year came from Establishment place men
The
High Heid Yins came back for a second go at Saturday's 2018 meeting
and were sent back to the executive floor to think again. One wonders
what scheme they will come up with in 2019 to keep the ordinary
stakeholders under their jackboot.
But,
as a member of the press corps who was there on Saturday said to me:
“The “noise” this year came from some Estabishment place men”
– when they invited 'National Treasures' Gregor Townsend, Fin
Calder and Iain Milne to speak during the debate on the Aberdeen
GSFP/Marr motion which successful established, it was the right of
the clubs to decide the bye laws regarding domestic competitions.
As
another press man said: “A competent chairman would have gently
reminded Toony, Fin and The Bear to stick to the issue under debate,
instead of allowing them to waffle on.”
This is an old Establishment trick used in other
fields – try to divert the crowd away from the subject and hope to
deflect attention. The feeling on the press benches was that
Chairman Colin Grassie's bed time story of a 28 minute waffle did its
job too, it took the heat out of the meeting and probably made enough
delegates woozy to cool their justifiable anger over some of the
Establishment's stranger decisions.
To
be fair to Mr Flockhart, by the way – and I have been harsh on him
of late – he did offer an apology for any upset he might have
caused, which is more than we got from that rotund Mancunian control
freak the Fat Controller, a man with definitely far more to apologise
for.
Mark Dodson - he owes us a huge apology for his actions
The
sense on the press bench was also, whereas 2017 had been the Fat
Controller and the Consigliore show, after 'Russellgate”, the
elected officers telt Haud It and Daud It to say as little as they
had to, for fear they made a bad situation worse.
And,
speaking of TFC, he did in his best Donald Trump style, announce that
his pride and joy – Stupid-6 would have cross-border competition,
via games against the top six clubs in the Welsh Premiership; this
competition to kick-off towards the end of the 2019-2020 season.
The
thing is, a Scot named Alexander Graham Bell, back in the 19th
century, invented this wee gadget, the telephone, which nowadays
enables one person to speak to another on the other side of the
world, far less the South Wales valleys.
Well,
I have this mate see, on the committee of one of the top Welsh club
sides, so, I asked him, as you do: “Look you Boyo, what's the goss
on this competition between your top six and ours?”
“Dunno,
haven't heard a dickie bird,” was the response. Although, another
contact, with friend in high places such as the WRU General Committee
tells me, his contact in the valleys says, it has been mentioned,
but, only in the passing like.
I
have since learned, the new competition is due to be discussed by a
WRU committee this week. However, already some of the leading Welsh
clubs are making it clear – they do not wish to play the
cross-border games in April and May, which is when the SRU would
apparently prefer to play them.
In
addition, the Welsh clubs are facing a cut in their grant from the
WRU, and some of them are questioning if they can afford to compete
in this new event.
Maybe
TFC jumped the gun somewhat in announcing it as: “happening.”
The
element of cross-border competition – allowing our better club
players, Academy graduates and “late developers” to demonstrate
they might be worth a punt as potential pros, was one of the key
drivers behind Stupid-6. Nobody is really arguing against this.
But,
is playing the Welsh Premiership clubs, given the WRU are somewhat
down-grading this level of competition, by introducing Regional
Under-23 squads, the way to go? I think, in an ideal world we ought
to be doing this too, by introducing Edinburgh and Glasgow A teams,
directly equivalent to the Under-23 and A squads being brought in by
the Welsh and Irish.
But,
this would need to be funded directly by the SRU, and, although they
will not admit it – they patently cannot afford to do this, hence
their move to get the clubs to underwrite this level of development
for them.
Will
it work? We honestly don't know, but, as a guide, I had a look at our
Premiership clubs' results against Welsh Premiership clubs while we
participated in the British and Irish Cup, between seasons 2009-10
and 2013-14.
In
those five seasons, eight Scottish Premiership clubs – Ayr, Currie,
Dundee HSFP, Edinburgh Academicals, Gala, Heriot's, Melrose and
Stirling County got to experience cross-border games – four of
these have now obtained SRU franchises.
Our
overall record, against Welsh Premiership clubs in the B&I Cup
reads: played 25 – won 4 – lost 21. The four games we managed to
win: Ayr v Llandovery in 2010-11, Melrose v Aberavon and Currie at
Swansea in 2011-12, then Dundee HSFP v Carmarthen Quins in 2012-13
were won - respectively by one point, one point, 17 points and two
points. The 21 games we lost saw the Scottish team, on only seven
occasions, lose by less than one score, while the average margin of
victory for the Welsh sides was just shy of 15 points.
If
we use these historic results as a guide, and we acknowledge the
Scottish teams were somewhat bolstered by drafted professionals, I
reckon they show us what might happen if and when this new
cross-border competition gets going. We would expect, initially, to
lose more than we win, particular in Wales, where our clubs posted
just one win in 11 visits.
But,
while we must acknowledge, on past form the Welsh Premiership seems
to be a slightly better higher standard of league than our
Premiership, with part-time professionalism spread more-widely across
Scotland (I suggest, at least Ayr and Melrose are “part-time
professional” already), we should have a chance of winning more
often, and, this cross-border competition would work.
Whether
it will give the SRU Performance Department the answers they seek as
to player readiness for full professional contracts – we will have
to wait and see.


Fraught with problems & complications - if it ever comes to pass! Right now, looking like another Blobson face-saving fib, said with a hope & a prayer. The big question is, would you ever want to save such a Janus-like face?
ReplyDeleteTo use a guid Lallans expression: Mair faces than the toon knock.
DeleteIt was an odd one I have to say. These things are usually done as a joint pr event to get maximum exposure. Not as a bit of a speech at an AGM!
ReplyDeleteThe more I reflect on the meeting the more I feel that the goal was to escape relatively unscathed. The comms gurus saw that a bit of humble pie was required and the apologies from President and Chair were heart felt and sincere. That Dodson chose not to says a lot.
The other issue is the increase in club funding. You know that warm fuzzy feeling you get when the government announces increased expenditure for the nhs then a few days later you get hit with the only way it can be paid for is increased taxes or lower services?
It smacks very much of that approach. The surplus being trumpeted by the SRU is in fact the whole games money. It is NOT the execs to dish out to who ever they feel like. So someone must have approved this expenditure (who and when?), it has been known about for weeks if not months and is still a relatively (to the funding of pro rugby and club services) poor.
apologies - to quick to press publish!
ReplyDeletethis surplus will have been known to the SRU for a while - well before the accounts were published
. The increase is still a fraction of the spend on pro rugby, domestic and performance and commercial departments
I get the impression, it's a wee bit like how the UK government operates, with things like GERS.
DeleteKeep the Jocks in the dark and don't tell them how much we are screwing them. In this case, with the SRU, the ordinary clubs, and the ordinary club game - they are "the Jocks."