BANNING troublesome journalists from open fora such as annual general meetings is never a good idea for any large public concern, and, if the SRU thought keeping me out of today's Murrayfield agm would shut me up - thnk again guys. Thanks are due to my trusty moles inside the room, and to those who took the trouble to give me their take on events afterwards, but, here it is: Aristotle's view on what happened.
SRU President Dee Bradbury - the first lady of world rugby
THE battle is o'er, and, to quote Celtic superfan Brian Dempsey back in 1994: “The rebels have won.” Ian Barr wiped the floor with the two Establishment candidates to win the vote to be the new vice president of the SRU, but, more importantly perhaps, the clubs restored their right to have a bigger say in who runs the SRU.
The
vote in the vice presidential election was as follows:
- Ian Barr (Lasswade) 106 votes
- Jim Littlefair (North Berwick) 48 votes
- Mike Monro (Aberdeen Wanderers) 30 votes
- Graham Love (Gala) 10 votes
Ian
Barr was therefore elected and will be SRU vice president during
seasons 2018-19 and 2019-20, assuming the presidency in August, 2020.
There
were two motions up for discussion; the first, proposed by Aberdeen
Grammar School FP and seconded by Marr covered the placement of the
“amateur” teams of the six new franchised clubs within the league
structure, and also called for a clear definition of an “amateur”
player below the franchised clubs' level.
The
motion called for the clubs to be involved in the debate around the
implementation of Agenda 3 and also called for the Council's Standing
Committee on Governance to be involved in resolving this issue. This
motion was passed.
Motion
2, proposed by Haddington, seconded by GHAand amended slightly by
Portobello, called for an addition to SRU bye-law 14 and sought to
reinforce the clubs' right to determine the set-up of domestic
leagues. Again this was passed.
The
thorny issue of 'Russellgate' – the sacking of former Director of
Domestic Rugby, Keith Russell and his subsequent successful claim for
wrongful dismissal was another potentially thorny issue. However, SRU
Chairman Colin Grassie managed to defuse this ticking bomb – for
the moment – by telling the meeting, it was expected that former
Solicitor General Lesley Thomson's report findings should be
published in September, when the matter would be fully aired. This
satisfied the meeting, for now.
In
the course of the meeting, the Establishement, particularly where
matters touched on the six franchises, wheeled-out several big
hitters to speak on their behalf. Fin Calder and Iain Milne, both of
whom are involved to some degree in the successful Heriot's franchise
bid – which will see a tie-in between lower Goldenacre and lower
teams from Calder's Stew-Mel uniting, spoke in support of the six
clubs, and of their “amateur” sides being placed in the National
Leagues.
Scotland
coach Gregor Townsend also reminded the meeting, the notion of
Super-6 was to narrow the gap between the club game and the
professional one. Strangely, no input from Director of Performance
Rugby Scott Johnston – the man who allegedly kicked-off the whole
Stupid-6 debate with his: “the Premiership is not fit for purpose”
remark.
And,
speaking of Stupid-6, it was announced that at the conclusion of
their domestic season, the six franchised clubs would play in a
competition against the top six Welsh Premiership clubs – this will
start at the end of the 2019-20 season, probably in March-April 2020.
The
meeting also confirmed the new members of the SRU Council, elected at
the meetings of each of their constituent member clubs, these
newcomers are:
- Murdo Gillanders (Lismore), replacing Jim Littlefair as Edinburgh Regional Leagues representative
- Alistair Forsyth (Earlston), replacing Alan Brown as the Borders Regional League representative
- Hazel Swankie (Dunfermline) replacing Graham Kerr as the Caledonia Midlands Regional League representative
- Bob Richmond (Mackie Academy FP), replacing Mike Monro as the Caledonia North Regional representative
- Adam Gray (Stewartry) retained his seat as Glassgow South Regional Leagues representative
Their
may be further changes to the Council, since promotion and relegation
issues have affected the clubs of some National League
representatives.
Rob
Flockhart stood down as President, the seal of office passing to Oban
Lorne's Dee Bradbury, the first lady to be elected President of a
major Rugby Union.
Finally,
none of the potentially contentious issues which might have arisen
under any other business were raised and the delegates departed.
However, with the ramifications of “Russsellgate” continuing, and
further potential flash-points over the franchise clubs' placement in
the SRU pyramid still unresolved, it would be foolish to say the war
was over.
Any
way, with Peebles Seven at the Gytes kicking off the Kings of the
Sevens series, and various other clubs playing pre-season friendies,
the new season is upon us, and we can concentrate less on the
politics and more on the actual playing of the game.
Perhaps
the main lesson of today was aimed at CEO Mark Dodson. I have dubbed
the rotund Mancunian The Fat Controller, with, I feel, good reason.
He is hardly a divisive creature – I don't actually think too-many
people like him. In the excellent The Offside Line today, David
Barnes produced a light-hearted measurement of how TFC had done
against some key performance indicators (KPIs) since taking control
at Murrayfield I 2011.
Barney's
take was:
- growing the business: up 46.4% (from a low base) the best of the four Home Unions by a long way – score 6/10
- international results – much better – score 7/10
- pro team attendances, (as a critical metric of performance) again from a small base: Glasgow up 155.9%, Edinburgh up 154% - 6/10
- nurturing the game: clubs playing – down; adult players – down, times hard – 5/10
- governance: Barney lists a whole host of failings before awarding – 2/10
- ethos of the game: measured against a list of controversies – 1/10
So,
overall, Barney gives TFC a score of – 27/60 across the six KPIs.
That's a failure in my book, and I feel Barney has maybe been a bit
generous in some cases.
You
can read the whole article in The Offside Line, and I urge you to.
For my part, I reckon the international results and the pro team
attendance aspects are little or nothing to do with TFC and would
discount these aspects from the examination.
There
is no question, in difficult times, he has done well where he has to,
in growing the business, but, elsewhere, Mr Dodson has been something
of a disaster. I honestly feel the total, embarrassing clusterfuck he
made of “Russellgate”, “Wanderersgate” and in his
relationship with outside agencies such as sportscotland, should
perhaps mean the time has come to say goodbye.
However,
with the stupidity of the Board, in giving him a new contract while
“Russellgate” remained unresolved, getting rid of him will be a
costly operation.

This is surely but a skirmish in the issues coming down the line. With a broadcast market that is "softening", a sponsorship space that is "challenging" and little sign of external investment in the pro game - a business model rethink will no doubt bring grassroots rugby (I'd say domestic but it seems Super 6 is part of domestic rugby) into conflict with pro rugby.
ReplyDeletep.s. our Welsh friends appear to be in the dark about the cross border competition and how it will fit with their season.
In many ways, only the end of the beginning. Much remains to be done to drain the Murrayfield swamp. What will thereby be revealed is almost guaranteed to offend the sensibilities of reasonable people.
ReplyDeleteDismissal for cause should have no compensation cost.
ReplyDeletein the end rather uneventful AGM - but long!
ReplyDeleteMuch contrition from Grassie and Flockhart - not reflected by Dodson in MHO
There are many hostages to fortune now. The Board and Council have kicked many cans down the road and will need to deliver and report back to clubs.
AA - i didn't hear Grassie say they would publish the report from Ms Thomson, they said they would report back on their actions from the conclusions and recommendations of the Thomson report. They have also brought in external advice. The defence that we are a commercial organisation and we need these agreements to protect commercial confidentiality is risible. In theory he is correct. In practice I can't believe that the types of roles and activities present in the SRU have a real comercial value.
Lets take na example - a regional development manager. What sort of commercial knowledge and insight would they have that would be attractive to competitors?? Firstly there aren't any competitors (if they go to another sports governing body they will have the same knowledge on getting grants etc as the next person)
The persons existing employment contract will already contain clauses on not disclosing information during and after employment - assuming the contract isn't broken (which is what an NDA does). Now for someone like Dom McKay thats a whole different situation and if required it probably would be appropriate. But if he was subject to an NDA then something really bad has happened (and he has f'ed up big time) as the contractual piece would cover his keeping secrets secret)
That the SRU has used 14 NDAs is actually shocking for a sports governing body. It shows an HR culture that is broken as they cant exit people through performance management. It could be they are trying to short circuit this performance process by getting rid of people (which happens - its sometimes cheaper to get someone to go now that work through the whole performance process however you would have to establish juts cause and then have a protected discussion. That this seems to not have happened is telling