TALK
about
throwing petrol on a blaze. The SRU has certainly done that this
afternoon, by releasing a special survey to all clubs regarding the
future structure of the leagues.
Gavom MacColl QC - is consulting with the clubs on the eague structure
Signed
off by Graham Ireland, wearing his Head of Regulations hat, and
issued in the name of Gavin MacColl QC, the new Chairman of the
Governance Committee, the document seeks to find the views of the
clubs on the league structure from next season, when Super-6 comes
into play.
The
survey makes it clear – S6 is happening, but it will be a
stand-alone league, with neither promotion or relegation.
It
also tackled, head-on, the vexed question of where the “club”
teams of the S6 franchise-holding clubs should play, offering four
options in response to this vexed issue:
- They should play in the Premiership/Championship
- They should play in National 1
- They should play in National 2
- They should play in National 3
- They should play elsewhere (with the clubs asked to specify.
That
question is the third on the survey form.
Question
1 asks:
- Does your club support the existing structure – four National leagues and the various regional leagues – remaining in place for next season?
- This calls for a straight yes/no response.
If
a club answers “Yes” to Question 1, they are invited to go
straight to Question 3, covering the S6 amateur club's placement.
If
a club answers “No” to Question 1, they are invited to answer
Question 2, which asks:
“Noting
that the potential placement of Super-6 club XVs is covered under
Question 3, how would your club suggest that the domestic leagues are
structured?”
They
are then offered to select from four options:
- Premiership/Championship, 3 x National Leagues and Caledonian, East and West Regional Leagues
- Premiership/Championship, 2 x National Leagues and Caledonian, East and West Regional Leagues
- Premiership/Championship, 1 x National League and Caledonian, East and West Regional Leagues
- Any other option – to be stated in writing.
There
is a fourth question, to be answered by those clubs wishing to see
the S6 amateur clubs placed outwith the National League structure –
whether their preferred option for that be one, two or three National
Leagues.
This
Question Four asks any such clubs if they feel the S6 amateur clubs
should be UNABLE to be promoted into the National Leagues; and asks
for how long they feel this promotion ban should last.
There
is also a fifth suggestion, in which the clubs can make any comments
regarding future league structures.
The
document must be counter-signed by the President, Secretary and
Treasurer of the club, and has to be returned to BT Murrayfield, by
31 October, 2018.
Super-6
was rather dropped on Scottish Rugby at the 2017 agm, since when all
Hell has broken out.
To
be fair to Graham Ireland and to BTM, this survey document certainly
seeks to discover what the troops on the ground are thinking, and
will provide much-needed clarity on this most-vexing of subjects.
To
me it is a major move in the search for clarity and peace within
Scottish Rugby. It will be interesting to see what transpires –
assuming BTM ever releases its findings.

Does the email give a fully realistic description of how all this has come to pass:
ReplyDelete"By itself, the creation and existence of the Super 6 competition does not cause any alteration to the existing league structures. Unless specific changes are made, those clubs playing within the current league structure (including Super 6 franchise holders) will continue to do so, with promotion and relegation applying according to existing competition rules."
The franchise document told us quite clearly that Club XVs would be removed from their existing league position and inserted somewhere else into the league structure.
On my initial reading, this sounds like Murrayfield attempting to keep the Super6 Club XVs where they are.
"By itself, the creation and existence of the Super 6 competition does not cause any alteration to the existing league structures."