SINCE
I
have been declared a “non-person” by those giants of Scottish
Rugby – TCD,
MH33 and
Buddy the Elf,
I
can with impunity: stand ootside the
Big Top,
as some of the worker ants inside have dubbed BT Murrayfield –
because the clowns are running the show – and be free to piss into
it.
Nathan Bombrys shows off the new Glasgow Warriors' logo
Image: © Craig Watson -
www.craigwatson.co.uk
Take
this week's bi show – the announcement of a new, super-duper
Glasgow
Warriors logo. Now,
I have nothing in principle against the new logo; it's just:
- Was it absolutely necessary?
- Can the cost be justified? - These graphic artists, visualisers and corporate identity gurus don't work for peanuts.
- Does it enhance the Glasgow brand?
To
be fair, I quite like the new logo, but, that said, there was nothing
wrong with the old one, and to be frank, some of the justification
mouthed-off by Nathan Bombrys at the launch was pure corporate
bullshit. Although, I did enjoy the wee 90 second video they came up
with about the origin of the Glasgow Warrior.
Old
Farts like me, who can remember the old Glasgow & District Rugby
Union badge can see the nod to history in there, but, shipyard cranes
and history – Aye Right, Nathan.
Of
course, those among us who must have the most-recent kit, will no
doubt, quite happily stump up the £50-plus it will cost them. And a
new strip is coming for the new season: the current strip price has
been all but halved in the SRU Shop is a definite sign of this.
Still,
the SRU has to try to make money somewhere, and inflicting an
unnecessary change on the paying public is one way of doing this.
WE
ALSO hear
that, while the suggested new 18,000-capacity Riverside Stadium might
simply be some one putting two and two together and getting five or
six, it appears talks are ongoing about further enhancing the
Scotstoun capacity, up to 12,000.
As
I wrote in my last post, the manner in which putting-up the temporary
stands behind the dead ball lines, and in the process taking out the
bends in the running track, so the athletes of Victoria
Park-City of Glasgow Athletics Club are
denied full use of the facilities has made Glasgow Warriors a couple
of bad words in some parts.
Last
season, Warriors played 15 home games at Scotstoun; that's 15 days on
which the stadium was used, with the running track take out of
commission. However, you have to add the days when it cannot be used,
while the temporary stands behind the dead ball lines are being
set-up, and the permanent facilities are being compromised, and those
people who wish to use them being denied full access.
I
appreciate, using a stadium with a permanent athletics track for
football or rugby has to involve compromise, but, if anything
Scotstoun had more of a history as an athletics venue than a rugby
one, and maybe as the latecomers to the show, rugby ought to
compromise a bit more.
Scotstoun's North Stand, could be extended
From
what I hear, the proposed Scotstoun development, if it happens, will
involve extending the North Stand. Assuming there is the room, I
would hope for a structure more akin to the present main
stand is built, and not another”Legoland” aberration, like the
planned “Mini-Murrayfield” home for Edinburgh.
I
know it will be more-costly, but, the SRU and Glasgow City Council
are hardly skint entities, so, why not go the whole hog, build a
proper 15,000 or 20,000-capacity stadium, with permanent stands which
allow full use of the athletics track.
Such
a stadium would allow Glasgow to fully cash-in on its reputation as a
sporting city, able to host bigger rugby games and bigger athletics
meetings, up to Grad Prix or Diamond League level, and would be
better than the small-minded, piecemeal developments which are
so-prevalent today.
I
am always optimistic and firmly believe: if you build it (and market
it properly) they will come.
ONE
OF the
relatively-unsung heroes of the Tennent's
Premiership
in the season just ended was Ayr loose-head Ruaridh
Sayce.
“Rugby Sauce” as he is known, came through the youth development
ranks at Millbrae, and last season he was a key element in the way
the Ayr pack dominated most games.
Ayr's Ruaridh Sayce backs-up Steven Longwell against Heriot's
He
always looks to me like a tubby schoolboy who has wandered onto the
wrong pitch, but, he has listened to what Pat McAthur and Glen
Tippett have told him and along with the outstanding Shaun
Muir, Steven Longwell
on the opposite side of the Ayr scrum and Stirling County's Murphy
Walker,
he has been one of the outstanding props in the division.
If
Ayr could stop him eating the “wrong” stuff and convert some of
his weight to muscle – Sauce could be a tasty addition to the
professional ranks.
I
mentioned Murphy Walker in the last paragraph. I thought he did well,
on the opposite side of the scrum, for the Under-20s against South
Africa. I was side-tracked and missed all but the last half hour of
the game, when the opposition's power did for the Scots, but, I
thought Walker stood up well. It was also good to see Marshall
Sykes back
in action and none the worse for his long injury lay-off last season.
Not
for the first time, Scotland, while looking dangerous with ball in
hand, rather let themselves down with handling errors at crucial
moments, while, the Welsh referee gave them little or no leeway.
There was one moment when the South Africans were given an advantage
which took them the length of the field, before he called: “advantage
over.” Two minutes later, he gives Scotland an advantage and, three
phases in, with the Scots having lost about 20 metres and possession,
he calls: “advantage over.” What the fuck was that all about?



I will have a pint of what ever you are drinking AA.
ReplyDelete“The SRU and Glasgow City Council are hardly skint entities”. The evidence would contradict that statement.
GCC have a very large equal pay claim to fund. Which frankly they don’t have the money for. One solution is to take loans out against the assets in Glasgow Life such as the velodrome. I would offer that there will be nothing left to pay for any meaningful stadium development if the council needs to pay into that.
The SRU demonstrates by each action their fear of future financial problems. S6, Old Glory, the French thing are example of short term thinking with small cash outlays.
The new Edinburgh “stadium” reeks of caution and a realisable asset.
Didn’t Scotstoun also get lottery money to fund the athletics facilities?
I can see where you are coming from in having doubts about the liquidity of the SRU and GCC. GCC will I dare say do a deal with the Scottish Government to fund the back pay element of the women's claim. You also mention the considerable assets the City owns, the SRU is also asset-rich, I would suggest.
DeleteCertainly, the SRU appears reluctant to risk more than the minimum they can in any new development, but, I do not think they can plead poverty in delaying any real development.
I, like you, am fairly sure the running track and athletics facilities attractred lottery-funding.
In what sense may the SRU be described as "asset-rich"?
DeleteThis needs to be considered in light of encumbrances to sale and an overarching requirement to replace like with like (or better).