REMEMBER,
some
months back, there were suggestions that the SRU was looking to take
a minority stake in Newcastle
Falcons. Nobody
was able to – as we say in the media - “stand the story up,” so
it died a death. We got side-tracked via Nice and Washington, but,
apparently the notion of the SRU expanding into Northumberland has
not completely died inside Murrayfield.
Might this be Scotland's third pro side?
I
am told, some within HQ still believe, Newcastle might be the best
fit for a third Scottish professional side. On some levels, it makes
sense; there are already a good number of Borders folk who prefer to
get their pro rugby fix at Kingston Park on a Friday night, rather
than at Murrayfield, while, with the past history: Doddie Weir, Gary
Armstrong, Alan Tait, George Graham and today's connection via Gary
Graham, John Hardie and on-loan Alex Dunbar, there is a proven
history of Jocks doing well for the Geordies.
OK,
the English Premiership's 70% English rule is a problem, and maybe
not the largest one, but, now that money is increasingly talking,
never say never.
Mind
you, I still feel, in the long term, the best bet would be for the
Irish, Scottish and Welsh Rugby Unions to take the three London-based
Exiles clubs into central ownership, and play the London corporate
market to fund them in an extended PRO14.
However,
with CVC Capital Partners buying into the game – I can still see an
NFL-style Pan-European League being formed within the next decade.
Apparently, “billions” are coming into the game, which will
surely alter its shape for ever.
Of
course, if that does happen, where stand our traditional clubs? There
is always the chance the millions which the SRU make from the overall
billions in the pot, will need to be spread through all sections of
the game. No use simply paying the players, and boosting the suits'
incomes, if the grass-roots is allowed to wither.
The
clubs will really need to start sending awkward bar stewards, with an
idea of business, to serve on the Council and Board; guys capable and
willing to tell TCD and MH33: “You
look at the options, and give us the information which will enable us
to make the decisions – because, we represent the clubs, the clubs
ARE the SRU and we, on behalf of the clubs, rather than you on behalf
of yourself, will make these big decisions.”
That
is how things SHOULD
be done. It is time
we stopped TCD acting as if only he mattered and only he can decide
things. He doesn't own Scottish Rugby – he is a servant of the
Union.
GLASGOW
WARRIORS were
quickly out of the traps this morning, with the news tight-head prop
Petrus du Plessis had signed a new deal to remain with the club, as
specialist scrum coach.
This
is a good development. The big South African is maybe the sort of
overseas player we ought to be seeking to recruit: a
hugely-experienced guy, on the downward slope of his career, but with
the technical know-how to pass-on what he has learned to the young
Scottish players coming through.
Certainly,
he may have to pull-on the Warriors' strip again during the World
Cup, but, I am sure his real value will be demonstrated in afternoon
sessions with the young Scottish props on the back pitch at
Scotstoun.
Somewhat
similarly, Lelia Masaga did not set the heather on fire during his
short spell with the club. However, he won many admirers and friends
with his encouragement of the very-good young backs at Glasgow Hawks,
where his on and off-field coaching was much appreciated by everyone.
Still
on Glasgow Warriors, centre Stafford McDowall has changed his
personal picture on his Facebook account to this:
Am
I the only one who thinks Stafford and Robbie Nairn are setting out
to become the new Ali Price and Finn Russell?
I
HEAR, from
some friends in Scottish Athletics, that questions are being asked. I
even hear Freedom of Information requests have gone into Glasgow City
Council and Glasgow Life, about the relationship between George
Square and Murrayfield, and the Warriors.
Scotstoun
has been a major athletics venue for longer than it has been a rugby
ground. But, with Warriors's success in recent years, both on and off
the field, the athletics community in Glasgow, and in particular
Victoria Park and City of Glasgow AC, the athletics club based at
Scotstoun, are starting to feel they are being side-lined in favour
of the rugby team.
Installing
additional stands behind the goal takes a large swathe of the
state-of-the-art Scotstoun track out of commission at the start of
their season; meaning the athletics club is unable to train there
fully. Needless to say, the club is not happy at this favouritism,
and, who can reasonably blame them.
So,
now some in athletics are seeking to find-out why Warriors are being
favoured.
Questions are being asked around Warriors' deal at Scotstoun
Grist
was added to the mill last week, with a rumour, which may yet turn
out to be “fake news” of a plan to build a new 18,000-seat
stadium on the riverside, near the Transport Museum and the SECC,
which would be home to Warriors and Partick Thistle.
Now,
a new home for Warriors does make sense, given their success in
recent seasons. And while some purists might welcome the “Harry
Wraggs” returning to Partick from Maryhill, that's the bit of the
project which I don't see happening.
Why
move from Firhill, which has been Thistle's home for years, and which
is adequate for their current and future needs? Why give up the
ownership of that ground, to become co-tenants with Warriors in a
development which is partly-funded too by the city.
And,
even if they were seriously thinking of such a move, can you imagine
any way whereby Glasgow City Council could get away by helping-out
Thistle with a new stadium, without also spending at least as much,
if not more, on the Bigot Brothers, whose uber-entitled fans would be
quick to scream “foul” if they thought the Jags were getting
something they weren't.
Also,
how would a new stadium for Warriors sit with the shambles which is
the new Legoland ground for Edinburgh on the Murrayfield back
pitches.
No,
fake news
to me, but, what becomes of the FoI request re Scotstoun might be
very interesting.



I suspect that the SRU don’t have the cash to support stakes in Premiership clubs hence the Old Glory and French projects.
ReplyDeleteLet’s flip this over and consider a different angle. The RFU decide that they need to develop their players outside of the hothouse of the Premiership. This Super 6 idea sounds fantastic for that purpose and it’s buttons to get one.
They start having discussions with various franchises about this.
What would you think the SRUs attitude to this would be? Perhaps these are the fabled minority investors they are looking for in the Pro sides.
I would also expect to see World Rugby to introduce cross border ownership rules just as there are in football. Especially if “billions” are about to fall into the game - which I don’t believe for a second.
Getting into bed with venture capitalists is like sleeping with alligators.
Indeed - once you've tried an alligator for size, you'll just know how much more fun you can have with a good old crocodile, IMHO!
DeleteBut, hey! Most people round here will know that the system, the model, the player "ownership" profile, are totally different south of Hadrian's Wall, so the innovative apple turn-over S6 suggestion simply doesn't hold water.
In Engerland, the top clubs tend to rule the roost, and in fact they do occasionally farm out players to lesser outfits for game time & development purposes.
S6...??? Naw.