I
WAS shooting
the breeze earlier this week, with someone who knows his way around
the corridors of power inside BT
Murrayfield,
and he reckons, in one way, the High Heid Yins in there will not be
too-upset at the Scotland
Under-20 squad's poor
performance in the Under-20
World Cup,
in Argentina.
This
post is being written prior to their final “must-win”
11th
- 12th
place play-off against Fiji.
If Scotland lose,
they will be relegated out of the top tier of play at that age group.
But, even if they beat the Pacific Islanders, this will not go down
well as a good performance by the Scots.
The
guy I was speaking to, however, reckons this bad performance will be
seized upon by some within Murrayfield as proof positive: “We
were right to criticise the Tennent's Premiership (where
the home-based players in the U-20 squad play their rugby week-in,
week-out) as 'NOT FIT
FOR PURPOSE.'”
I
have no doubts, some of the “suits” will use this argument,
however, they will be less-pleased with my contact's next viewpoint:
“But, what does this
poor performance say about our Academy system, the men who are
running it, and a selection policy at age group level?”
To
some of us watching, today, going to the
“right” school
appears to matter more than ability when it comes to getting into age
group squads and onto the ladder which might eventually lead to a
Scotland cap.
My
mate firmly believes, if the six franchises in the new Super-Six
competition, which is where most of the U-20 guys will be playing
next season, get their acts together from the off, and hit the ground
running, the current poor position can be turned around.
But,
and this guy thinks S6 is a good idea, he warns: “
The six clubs
will need to get their acts together, and have Academies of their
own, which will have to include players from surrounding “feeder”
clubs. The playing base at youth level will need to be broadened.
“We
need to see the six franchises leading partnerships with local
authorities and surrounding clubs, getting more youngsters playing,
having them better coached and better-prepared for playing the game.”
The
original prospectus for S6 spoke of the franchises being: “Beacons
of excellence, driving-up standards locally;” if
this does not happen, Scottish Rugby is doomed to suffering more
disappointments like that in South America at the moment.
WE
DON'T know for certain,
but, I suspect the SRU was
one of the Unions who kicked the proposals for the World
Rugby Nations League into the
long grass at this week's meeting.
Given
they lost to both Italy and
Georgia during the
Under-20 World Cup,
the future for Scotland is
not exactly bright. Relegation out of the 6 Nations is
a distinct possibility at this time, so, self-preservation has
almost-certainly kicked in and TCD and
the troops seem certain to be agin change.
But,
this one has not been permanently parked. It will re-surface some
day.
MY
ATTENTION has been drawn
to an item in Wales Online
this week. This concerns the accounts of Ospreys. These,
the latest to be published, going up to June, 2018, do not make for
good reading:
- A £2.7 million loss in 2017-18
- £4.6 million of debt written-off, to produce a pre-tax profit of £1.85 million
- Current liabilities of just under £2 million
- Shareholder liabilities of just under £3.5 million
- Figures described as *unsustainable”
- The auditors voicing their “concerns” at the situation
- Warnings of “challenges ahead.”
I
well accept, comparing professional rugby in Wales or England with
the position in Scotland is a clear case of “apples and
pears.” But, with the
well-established history of losses and debts in the English game, and
the equally well-established knowledge of the turmoil in Wales, how
confident can we be in the underlying good financial health of the
professional game up here?
The
SRU hierarchy has made good use of “smoke and mirrors”
to deflect the attention of the
clubs – the main stakeholders – from the annual accounts. We
honestly don't know how much it costs the Union to run Edinburgh
and Glasgow each
season, while the powers-that-be have become very good at dodging
questions about the Union's finances.
Given
how trust has broken down between Union and clubs over the past year,
and following the disgraceful behaviour of some of the top table at
the recent SGM,
anti-hierarchy feelings are
running wild and the word in the club bars is that, this year, the
top table will not be so-easily able to quell any rising from the
floor.
The
Chinese got it right: we are living in “Interesting
Times.”
What are the 'right' schools that you refer to? In the most recent Scotland U18 squad named in April, 50% of the players selected went to private school. Just 5 came from Merchiston and Watsons, two schools which I suspect you would consider 'right'; and this small number includes Jamie Dobie, who Dave Rennie is clearly a huge fan of. Do you think Rennie would play ball with some sort of SRU-driven agenda to only pick players from certain clubs? Admittedly this 50% figure does not reflect the proportion of Scots that are schooled private to state, but I would argue it is actually a pretty fair reflection of the rugby playing population in Scotland as a whole at school level. In addition, the likes of Marr, Ayr, Preston Lodge, Madras, Dumfries and Hamilton - not the most 'fashionable' of clubs - are all represented in the playing group. From my experience the standard of play from U16 to U20 level is simply not high enough compared to the other top tier nations. I also have my doubts about whether Super 6 is the solution to this problem, but to argue that the U20 woes are down to selection bias is wide of the mark in this day and age
ReplyDeletehear hear
DeleteI suppose it would also be the Premierships fault that the 7s have failed to finish above 10th over the last couple of years or the Women finished bottom of the 6 Nations.
ReplyDeleteBlame the Premiership all they like, but there are issues across Scottish rugby, including their shiny Academy system that looks like it's failing to keep up with other developed and developing rugby nations.
Pro rugby has taken it's lion share of funding over the past decade or so, whilst grassroots has been looking for crumbs off the table. Super 6 is the next stage of the finance drain from the Club game, and the Premiership clubs are finding that out the hard way.
If we are going to improve, we need investment at all levels, not just the top tier or so, with the goal of encouraging more people to play the game (contact, not just touch).
One would hope that those who wander the corridors of power would have similar ambition, and don't just sit their nodding heads when the exec suggest transferring funding from the grassroots to elite end of the game.
Consider also the amount of resources, personnel, time, finance taken up by the failing academies - and how the dubiously qualified managers control players' activities, etc.
DeleteThe wise and experienced, all-seeing, snappy Silver Croc is thinking "white elephant"!