GAVIN
BLACKBURN, Coach
of West of
Scotland, had
a justifiable moan on Facebook
yesterday
– about the early effects of Super-6.
Apparently,
a S6 club has recruited some players from a Tennent's
Premiership club, who
have, in turn raided West
to
fill the gaps in their squad. Now, I well know, people in rugby have
long memories, and there will be some who will say: “So
what, what goes around comes around,” and
refer to the days when, as the leading club in the West of Scotland,
Burnbrae
was
the destination of choice for ambitious rugby players from west of
Harthill.
It
is also a fact of life, players have always moved, but, it now seems
as if those who prophesied that S6 would see: “the
hoovering-up of talented and ambitious players by a handful of
clubs,” may
well be on the money.
It
might also be that this is a short-lived phenomena, or even that it
is an isolated incident. What happens recruitment-wise between now
and the kick-off of the leagues in late August will tell us more.
However,
it does under-pin, those who said Super-6/Agenda-3 was
ill-thought-out, might have a point.
It
all comes down to making the best of our home-grown talent, and how
we accomplish this. For the record, the -Aristotle
Armstrong view is:
- Best practice – Scotland's full-time professional teams run their talent development scheme, utilising the best young talent in the country and running the Academy system.
- For this to work best, we need at least three, and preferably four, full-time professional sides, perhaps with at least one of these a designated “development” team.
- Failing this, we revert to a District system for elite player identification and development.
- Failing this, we go with Super-6.
There
are undoubtedly some good points around S6/A3,
however,
the entire scheme has been badly-managed by The
Junta at
Murrayfield:
- There never appeared to be a Master Plan which could be SOLD to the clubs
- There was little or no consultation
- Some absolutely daft decisions were made – not least the three franchisaes in Edinburgh
- The whole thing seemed to be being made-up as we went along.
Which
explains the current chaos
We
are now too far down the line to re-boot to a new default position;
things will not be pretty this coming season.
It
will be interesting to see what happens once Sir
Bill Gammell and
Norman
Murray
have taken their revival of 'Brush
Strokes' round
the clubs: will there whitewash obscure a few failings, or, will it
throw light into some dark corners and make things better.
Of
course, it would help if we knew into what particular areas of
governance and the general management of the game in rugby they are
charged with looking into.
HERE'S
WHAT I think should happen
- We acknowledge – there are three levels of rugby in Scotland
- Performance rugby – the national sides (including the Sevens and the age group squads); the Super-6 franchises
- “Semi-professional” rugby – the National League clubs
- “Amateur” rugby – the Regional League clubs
As
I have said, by going for Option-3, the Super-6, Murrayfield has
almost certainly picked the wrong option, they ought to have gone
with three or four full-time pro sides, failing that, Glasgow and
Edinburgh having reserve development teams. But, they didn't, and for
at least the next five years, we are stuck with S6.
The
six franchises (which we acknowledge should have had a broader
geographic spread) should be under the control of the Performance
Department at Murrayfield – which should be run by a Director of
Rugby. Appointing a DoR is a matter of urgency.
“Semi-Professional”
or “National League” rugby also need radical overhaul:
- We have too-many National Leagues, and too-many National League clubs.
- There should be pre-determined standards before a club is granted NL status.
- In infrastructure, these clubs should have floodlights, a grandstand, fully-enclosed grounds. There ought to be a determined move, as with Performance Rugby, towards these clubs having 3G pitches, and, in the longer term, money being available – indoor training facilities
- NL clubs should have at least two adult teams, and a proper youth development programme which meets pre-determined criteria.
I
know, some are going to read this and immediately shout: “That's
fewer but stronger, which is wrong.”
Yes,
it will mean fewer clubs being “National League” clubs,
and yes, these clubs will be stronger, but, it will make life easier
for the lowest tier – the Amateur” clubs.
These
clubs would then be free to simply get people playing rugby, at a
local level. Perhaps not all rugby would have to be full-fat,
15-a-side rugby. The SRU ought to be allowing smaller clubs to play
ten-a-side rugby if that's all the players they could muster – but,
at that level, the answer is to get people playing, the cream will
continue, as it always has, to rise to the top, provided we take
talent identification seriously, and encourage the guys and girls who
show promise, to move up.
We
also need, with a view to the future, to build bridges between clubs
and schools. There is no better place in which to get kids interested
in playing rugby than in the schools.
When
I was being introduced to rugby as a First Year schoolboy, our PE
teacher at Cumnock Academy, Jock “Stiffy” McClure, was a
war-time and “Victory” cap, who was very-unlucky never to gain a
full cap. He played for Ayr, Wasps, Glasgow and for The
British Empire, against France at the end of WWII. He was a rugby
fanatic.
But,
he was not alone, all of the Ayrshire Senior Secondary schools –
the Academies at Ayr, Kilmarnock, Irvine Royal and
Ardrossan, Marr College and Spiers School at Beith, each
had a rugby fanatic as Head of PE, with enthusiastic active players
taking a year team.
Out
of these schools came, when I was at school: from Ayr Academy:
internationalists Ian McLauchlan and Gordon Strachan,
plus the players who were the backbone of Ayr's rise from
semi-junior to full “championship” satatus. Marr College gave
us Peter and Gordon Brown and Bill Cuthbertson, plus
another bunch of very good players who moved on to bigger clubs.
Kilmarnock
Academy was the font from which Kilmarnock RFC followed
Ayr into the top-flight. David -and Ian Gray went
there, as did the likes of David Good, Richard Allen and
others who broke into the Glasgow XV. Irvine Royal gave us
John and Al McHarg, plus a lot of other guys who would
move to bigger clubs. Ardrossan Academy gave us Ian
Murchie, and Brian and Jimmy Gossman, plus a few
others who went to bigger clubs. Spiers School produced David
Shedden and Alec Wilson.
As
a fledgling sports writer in the 1970s and early 1980s, I watched the
likes of John, David and Alan Brown, Steve Munro and
Tony Adair and Willie Reddox from Ayr Academy, that
great Marr College side which reached the first Scottish
Schools Cup Final,. At the same time, Kilmarnock Academy were
still a power in the land, producing the likes of Hugh Hamilton.
Indeed,
last week, on the Rugby Memories Scotland page on Facebook,
someone posted the programme from the Glasgow v Australia
match in 1984. Nine of the starting XV came from Ayrshire, six of
them products of the county's state schools.
That,
of course, was before the effects of the teachers' strike came to be
felt. After that, it could be argued that only the late and
much-missed Brian Gilbert and John Sharkey at Marr
College kept rugby at their school going to the same extent as
before the big stramash.
The
clubs have never quite plugged the gap. We have the odd good
initiative, Ayr's Glen Tippett and Stuart Fenwick have
worked hard to re-establish rugby at some schools, and build a bridge
from these schools to their club. Harry Reilly has done great
work in this respect at Cumnock, while Gordon Brown has done
similarly sterling and even-more successful missionary work at
Carrick Academy/Carrick RFC. While I can only really speak
about what is going on in God's County, I am certain there are
similar good news stories across Scotland.
What
- I am assured by people who know more about this than I – would
help, is if the SRU would drop their stupid not playing twice over a
weekend rule.
Personally,
I feel, if the SRU, the clubs and schools got their acts together
properly, we would use the schools to introduce the kids to the game,
with the more-promising raw talent fed into the local club for
polishing. For this to work, we would need to recruit and train more
grass-roots coaches, to go into the schools and “sell” rugby;
then ensure, the really promising talent is fed into the clubs.
Only
a very few will ever make it through to the performance side of the
game, but, if the rest continue to play for fun at an amateur club
level, it is a win-win situation.
We
really need to try harder, work harder and make harder decisions. Do
we have the governance system, and more-importantly, the people in
key positions within the game to make this reality?

Interesting blog AA in violent by agreement with most of your pints but but all.
ReplyDeleteIf Super 6 is the answer what is the question? I have posed this before but never satisfactorily got an answer from the promoters of this particular scheme.
That we need a tier of rugby between the “club” game and the Pros is undeniable. How we get there is the point of contention.
I would go for the district approach after players had completed a Premiership season.
What we can agree o. Is the SRU are unable to fund professional rugby to the extent that they can pay for the next level down in the pro ladder. Hence the S6 wheeze.
The SRU wants to trumpet the funding they give to the “club” game at the same time as diverting £750K into a performance rugby project. You can’t have it both ways.
On the schools front I agree partially.
ReplyDeleteYes clubs need to strengthen ties with schools.
However the elephants in the room are a) inactivity and b) competition
Kids are less active than they were 30 years ago. We are seeing epidemic obesity as well. This is not a good combo.
Rugby has to fight with a multitude of sports. It’s a difficult game to sell and difficult to like when you start out. What do you mean I need to stop that big guy who is running towards me. Ouch that hurts.
You provide the template of how most of us started playing. Try it at school. Get pick for school team (usually because you were rubbish at football). Get noticed by a teacher at another school who happened to be at the local club. Invites you along to u16s etc. You start playing 2 games on a Saturday. Once with school then with Colts. You even try adult rugby. You get the bug and are hooked.
I would contend that’s not how it is anymore. Yes we are missing the crucial ingredient- teachers taking rugby. Kids have many more choices to try out and some of those don’t involve leaving the house.
Finally you seem to think we are now stuck with S6 for five years. That’s a big assumption.
ReplyDeleteOne of the franchises goes down. What then?
The promised sponsorship isn’t realised
The clubs discover that the sponsor market doesn’t stretch to providing for their club 1sts and the S6 side.
The hoover problem was so easy to predict. Because we don’t have enough players. The SRU tacitly recognise this by trying to fudge the rules they set up of pros play only pros and amateurs amateurs. Thankfully the Nat 1 sides saw sense and stuck to club players only in the comp.
When you smash a bottle, even when you gather all the pieces together and stick them back together, it’s not the same bottle. That’s where we are at. Time will tell whether the new bottle is for fit for purpose.
Going round in circles on the majority of these points now. S6 player acquisition having the predicted effect, and this will continue while lower echelons begin to wither & die.
ReplyDeleteSo true TSC. It feels much like Brexit to me. Just to be political for a mo - we need to do the no deal leaving to get the full impact of what a shitshow its going to be. As with Super 6 - we need to go into it to fully realise how crap the bods in Murrayfield are. Yes Im tlajking about Dodson and co rather than the Development group
Delete