Aristotle Armstrong

Aristotle Armstrong
The thrawn, alternative voice of Scottish Rugby

Saturday, 9 June 2018

DODSON MUST GO - PLUS SEVERAL OTHERS

  Taxi for Dodson

 

THIS blog has, for some time now, been very-supportive of another rugby blog – the excellent: THE OFFSIDE LINE, set-up and run by big David Barnes.


Today, big Barney has excelled himself, with his four-part expose of the machinations on the part of Ayatollah Dodson and his Gang, in the crude dismissal of former head of Domestic Rugby Keith Russell; and the revelation that Dodson's dodgy dismissal will cost the SRU a six-figure settlement sum, after Russell, father of course of the mercurial Finn, won his Unfair Dismissal case against the Union.

There can be only one outcome to this:

DODSON MUST GO – and quickly

and, I think he should take one or two others of the Stab in the Back Gang with him.

I do not intend here to quote at length from David's excellent journalistic work, work which once again exposes the failings of the mainstream media in Scotland, who ought to have been all over the case, and the failings of the Union which it has exposed, like a rash.

Do log into The Offside Line and read the four articles – I urge you

This is a seminal moment for the SRU, on the field we are doing well. Overnight, in Edmonton, a youthful and inexperienced Scotland team produced some hugely-entertaining and encouraging rugby in beating a game but limited Canada. Internationally, we are in a good place.

At professional level, with new coaches still bedding-in and trying to assemble “their” teams, Edinburgh and Glasgow had good seasons, indeed, with one or two better breaks, they might have had great seasons.

But, this was assembled on the foundations of a domestic club game in turmoil, with clan wars breaking out all over the place and under the overall control of paid executives, a Board and a Council who, apparently don't give a fuck about the game's main stakeholders – The Clubs.

I know, it's an old Scottish failing – when we don't have the English to fight, we just fight among ourselves. But, stop, think for a moment:

What might Scottish Rugby do if we were all singing off the same hymn sheet?

The forth-coming SRU AGM, in August, already promised to be a tetchy, bad-tempered affair, with the Russell Affair now out in the open, it just got a lot worse. Realistically, Dodson and several of his henchmen, such as the LSJ, really have no alternative but to consider their positions and, I would suggest, start drafting resignation letters.

And, our supine Councillors really have to take a really hard look at themselves in the mirror, because their failings in not holding Dodson & Co to account, got us to this current awful state.

Keith Russell (pic courtesy of Craig Watson)

Take this quote from Keith Russell, recounting a meeting with Dodson, three months before he (Russell) had even started working for the SRU:

“The main thing he [Dodson] talked about for an hour was wanting to keep the [SRU] Council quiet. He had a problem with the Council getting involved in things. This wasn’t all that long after the AGM where they’d knocked back the Super Eight proposals, and he said the Council: 'was just getting in the way'.”

If recent experience is anything to go by, Dodson has, indeed, “kept the Council quiet,” and stopped them: “getting in the way.” But, at what cost to Scottish club rugby?

The judgement of an employment tribunal, revealed during the week just past was: that - “Russell’s dismissal was, indeed, ‘procedurally and substantively unfair’.”

Keith Russell said himself, more in sorrow than anger:
 

“It is so disappointing to realise that the guys at the top are not good guys and do not represent the values and culture of rugby.”


So, here is a question for everyone with the good of Scottish Rugby at heart: Do we continue to let the bad guys run things – or do we stand up for the game and get rid? I think the answer to that is obvious – so, what are the clubs, the bodies being disadvantaged and used by these bad guys, do about it.

Do we leave them to continue to do their worst, or do we fight back and cut out the poison? Again, I think the answer is obvious.

And, they are still doing it – in spite of the damning verdict of the Industrial Tribunal.

I received word from a very-senior gentleman in Scottish Rugby, to the effect that, although would-be vice president Jim Littlefair (the Chinese restaurant – Jim Who?) is in Canada as part of the official SRU touring party – at last week's National League 2 and 3 hustings, in clear breach of SRU rules on elections – the President, Lance-Corporal Jones himself, was actively lobbying on behalf of the missing candidate.

Lance-Corporal Jones - breaking his Union's own rules to lobby for The Chinese Restaurant we hear

If a vice-presidential candidate, dependant for support and for getting the job, on securing the votes of the clubs, can take himself off on an all-expenses-paid jolly to the Americas, during the run-up to an election, in which he is a candidate – does that speak volumes in contempt for his electorate?

Then, to have the President himself lobbying for that missing candidate – that's 'Trumpton' in action for me.

Any way, with a final reminder that a fish rots from the head down, and, yet another plug for the best blog in Rugby Union – I close by urging you to read all about it in The Offside Line. Now, I am off for a shower.

4 comments:

  1. I'm sitting here shaking my head with steam coming out of my ears having read yours and David Barnes pieces, but you know what, I'm not surprised by what he has written The Clubs and their representatives are guilty of allowing this to happen cause they're too worried about not getting the odd freeby now then and not getting a bit of grant money disguised a development funding to bail them out when they need it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow just wow.

    Keith has to be applauded for his courageous stand. He could have easily accepted a compromise agreement and went off to a quiet life. So well done for following through. Though my reading of is he had a rock solid unfair dismissal case and so it proved.

    Lots of red faces around today - and nit from any sunburn. I bet the board will be wishing they had waited till the case finished before extending Dodsons contract!

    Well hell mend them - council , board and execs. You made your bed

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sometimes it takes courage to stand up for your principals and for the greater good. Well done Keith it's a pity the board didn't have the courage to do the same. It's particularly disappointing given that the President vice president Doric Dan Quale and Jim Who sit on the board too. Elected by the Clubs yet not prepared to stand up for them. Perhaps now the Club's will see agenda 3 stupid six and all the other issues around Gold silver and bronze standards , new ticketing tool etc etc are all going to contribute to less Clubs. I sincerely hope the good people of Scottish rugby realise that all of the above will affect their Club from premier down to the lowest leagues. Fewer but Stronger ! As one ! Really !!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The evidence of the proceedings and Judge d'Inverno's assessment are utterly damning in respect of the senior executives' shortcomings and about the deficiencies in both management and organisational culture pervading Murrayfield.

    And we mustn't forget it was mentioned in the papers accompanying the judgement that it was Club Services Manager Nick Rennie (an ex-sportscotland placeman originally pitched in to the Murrayfield roster at a time of intense ongoing activity & relationship building between the SRU and his former employers....) who went to Dodson behind Russell's back to blacken the name of his immediate superior. Sounds like a really lovely guy, with designs on his boss's job!

    Returning to the principal issues:

    (1) Even if there were faults on both sides, how can the ghastly Dodson & cringeworthy Howat avoid the bullet for their woeful, unacceptable handling of this issue?

    (2) How can clearly sleazeworthy SRU chairman Colin Grassie justify his actions in extending Dodson's contract while all this was fermenting in the background? Are they in some kind of .....'er... "relationship" that transcends common sense, decency and acceptable business practice?

    (3) Should Grassie remain in position?

    (4) And finally, should the other two members of the discredited cabal of employed directors, the rarely-observed seemingly agaraphobic Scott Johnson and the lurking over-ambitious creepy bullsitting Dominic McKay be allowed to stay?

    Up to the clubs, and maybe the Council, now...!

    ReplyDelete