MY LATE elder brother was a tight-head prop – the cerebral member of any rugby XV, he was also, in the day job, an actual rocket scientist – he designed, among other things, air-to-air and air-to-ground missiles - back in the days when the UK had its own missile industry. He also spent some of his time at Cape Kennedy in Florida, from whence he returned one time with this new saying: “When you're up to your ass in alligators, it is difficult to remember – you are trying to drain the swamp.”
That
thought passed through my mind as I scanned the SRU's newly-released
document on Agenda-3, which sort of sidled-out from under a stone in
the gloaming of 20 June. As I read it, a wee comment from a fine
rugby man, again taken far-too-soon, came to mind. That man was the
late Tom Inglis – one-time SRU Board member, and former Ayr
President – how I wish we had men of Tom's calibre on the
Murrayfield Board today, I reckon TJ could have knocked Dodson's
smugness on the head PDQ.
The late Tom Inglis - we could do with guys like him around today
Any
way, as a successful Ford dealer, Tom once described the glossy
British Leyland brochure on one of their failed “next big things”
- a product of the Austin Design Office (ADO), as: “Much
ado about nothing,”
the car in question made narry a dent in Ford Cortina sales figures.
“Much
ado about nothing” is my take on the Agenda-3 document. However,
check it out for yourselves, it can be accessed at:
The
document runs to, including the front and back covers – 18 pages,
page two is the contents page, so, there are 15 pages of detail,
split into three distinct sections. Of these:
- Section One, pages 4-9 deals with Agenda 3 and the new Regional Support structure – the part which will be of most-concern to most clubs.
- Section Two, pages 10-13 deals with Stupid-6 and, as such, covers a lot of old ground, although, at the end there is an interesting new development, of which more later.
- Section Three, pages 14-17 deals with consultation with clubs.
Section
One
Document co-signaturies "Blaikie" and "Olive" meet "The Fat Controller"
We
learn in the foreword, co-signed by Rob Flockhart and Dee Bradbury,
or “Blaikie and Olive” from 'On the Buses', as one critic dubbed
them (I prefer Lance-Corporal Jones and Mrs Pike myself), Agenda-3 is
based on three pillars:
- Particiation
- Performance
- Finance
I'd
have put Finance first, after all, if you haven't got the money,
there's not a lot you can do, but, we move on. Early-on we get the
first piece of corporate bullshit, when we read: “At
the 2017 AGM, our Chief Executive Mark Dodson, stressed the
importance of the club game and why Agenda 3 was vital for the robust
good health of rugby in Scotland.”
Really
– you could have fooled me. Dodson cares not a jot about the club
game, as long as we continue to support his over-lavish salary.
The
Foreword also assures us: “This
paper will seek to provide additional information and clarity around
Agenda 3.” Debatable
– for me there was more actual detail put out previously, this
document adds precious little to what was already in the public
domain.
It
does re-affirm the six pillars on which the new Club Sustainability
Award (CSA) will be built, these were already in the public domain –
and will lead to Bronze, Silver and Gold awards to those clubs who
put in the effort over the different areas already outlined in
previous SRU publications.
Most
people will be interested in Page 5, which talks about funding and
support. Happily, this confirms: “Funding
elements that we have provided to clubs are continuing, including
travel support, player insurance, club development officer funding,
referee expenses, player reward scheme and ticket commission.”
The
document also confirms the introduction of Minimum Operating
Standards (MOS): “Which
require clubs to meet certain standards to operate, receive
investment and play in competition. The detail of these standards
will be published separately.”
The
document also fleshes-out the Investment Programme, outlined in the
2017 AGM, this covers a five-year period, starting in 2019-20,
coinciding with the Stupid-6 franchises, which will see – over
these five years:
- Each Championship club receive £45,000 (£9000 p.a.)
- Each National League 1 club receive £25,000 (£5000 p.a.)
- Each National League 2 club receive £17,500 (£3,500 p.a.)
- Each National League 3 club receive £10,000 (£2000 p.a.)
This
cash is intended to assist with player improvement areas; in
addition, the intention is to introduce prize money cascading down
through the leagues:
- £10,000 in the Championship
- £7,500 in National 1
- £5000 in National 2
- £4000 in National 3
- £3000 in each of the Regional Leagues
There
are no details yet as to how this prize money will be divvied-up in
practise.
Page
6, headed: “What initiatives will be implemented through Agenda-3”
is an 18 item “wish list,” very-broad brush strokes, but,
containing within it one or two interesting items, such as something
I suggested a wee while ago - “Walking Rugby”, but, as they say:
A wish is just a dream that hasn't come true; we wait and see.
The
final part of Section One – outlines the new look, restructured
Domestic Rugby
Department at
Murrayfield, or, as it will henceforth be known: The
Rugby Development Department. Sheila
Begbie will be in overall charge of a team consisting of:
- Five Regions – Caledonia North, Caledonia Midlands, Glasgow North, Glasgow South and Edinburgh, Borders and East Lothian; each with a Regional Directors.
- 12 Regional Managers
- 3 Schools and Youth Managers
- 1 Women and Girls Manager – Gemma Fay
- Head of Business Support and Operations – a totally new role
- Head of Training and Education
- Match Officials Commissioner
There
is a lot of detail within this section, and, while the news of one or
two weel-ent faces losing their jobs did not go down well with the
grass-roots troops, we might hopefully find at least some of these
guys back in slightly different roles. However, overall, this section
of the document is one of the more in-depth ones and a tribute to the
hard work Sheila Begbie has put in. The new department actually sees
an increase in staffing, which has to be welcome (provided they do their jobs) and the changes are
well-explained.
I
still hae ma doots about some aspects of the Mitsubishi Conferences,
which will continue – there were a lot of unplayed games here last
season, down the age groups, which is a bad sign for the future, but,
let's be positive and give the new set-up a chance.
This
is a good break point, before, in part two of my look at the
document, I move on to consider one of my favourite areas –
Stupid-6.
Enjoy
this part, I will be back with more on this.


It's a reasonable kicking off point for the start of a consultation exercise. Unfortunately, the reality is this is supposed to be giving us the detailed rationale behind the Agenda 3 decisions the Executive and Council have already made and approved which, we are told, followed a consultation exercise the Union has already carried out.
ReplyDeleteThis document sounds like the Union admitting the "consultation" they carried out previously was woefully inadequate.
Just remember, the real reason for Agenda 3 is "fewer, but stronger", where Keith Russell has told us that fewer potentially equals 50.
So in one of the new regions (Edinburgh, Borders & East Lothian (does this mean West Lothian is in Glasgow North)) we have 4 franchises and two Academys, whilst Glasgow North and Calie North, each have an Academy and no franchise.
ReplyDeleteDid someone sit down and plan this out right from the offset, or was it just made up on the hoof?
My initial reaction was exactly the same. Nothing of substance has been added to S6 or A3. The big tell is that we are now being consulted - on a small number of issues such as player payments.
ReplyDeleteA lot of after the fact justification in the document. I was in the room when clubs were castigated by a certain Mr M Dodson that the SRU would set HMRC on clubs who paid players. This calumny was so bad that the full force of domestic rugby would be brought to bear on this heinous act. No room for compromise. It was happening.
So what’s changed that there is such a softening from various key players? My contention is that this is to undermine the motions from Haddington and Aberdeen Grammar.
The regional structure is fascinating. Caledonia has been split in two but will still play together in Caley 1??? Given moves over the last couple of seasons I can’t see the Caley North Region Director being overworked and rumours persist that another North club is still considering its position in Caley 1 for next season.
Just as well I have a seat at the AGM!