EARLIER
this
week, on the excellent The
Offside Line,
David Barnes floated the notion of having a look at the programme for
the traditional Borders Sevens. Now, David's distinguished father,
Big Ian, may be one of the few Teris to be allowed out of Hawick
without an escort, and David's Edinburgh polish may be one of the
results of this, but, he ought perhaps to notice, Sevens isn't all
about the Borders.
Indeed,
given Sevens is the brand of Rugby Union Football, which has Olympic
Games presence, there is a chance, albeit at this stage only a small
one, that, some day in the future, Sevens could be the more-popular
form of the game.
This
may be a case of me indulging in something the great Graham Spiers
has accused me of in the past – hermeneutics – but, given the
platform of Olympic participation, Sevens just might catch-on in
nations without a traditional rugby heritage: look what has happened
in the USA for instance, and it may grow in these places, to the
detriment of the full-fat 15-a-side game.
Add
the increasing ferocity of the “hits” in the professional full
game, and we could see, going forward, parents telling their
children: “You can play seven-a-side rugby, but, not that violent
15-a-side game.”
I
have felt for some time, the SRU ought to be paying more attention to
Sevens, indeed, I would hope the High Heid Yins would, if they can
turn their little minds away from dreaming-up means of screwing more
cash for them to fritter away on pet projects out of the
long-suffering rugby public, take a deep and considered look at the
entire fabric of the game here.
Anent
Sevens; we read that their under-performing Sevens programme is one
area at which Twickenham is looking, as they undertake their
austerity programme. (A wee aside here, the RFU doing austerity
surely proves they are indeed - “The Tory Party with dirty knees.”)
The
RFU is the lead union in the BOA's (British Olympic Association's)
Team GB sevens programme. So, if Twickenham is to cut the funding, or
downgrade their sevens programme, surely, as the inventors of the
short form of the game, the SRU will need to step-up and carry the
ball.
Qualification
for Rio in 2016 was pretty straight-forward; the BOA having nominated
England as lead nation, once they finished fourth in the World Rugby
Sevens series, Team GB was going to Rio. It was then a case of using
summer 2016 European tournaments to pick the final squad for Rio.
This
time round, regardless of the uncertainty over the English sevens
programme, England only finished fifth in the World Rugby?HSBC Sevens
Series, so, Team GB will need to get through the qualifying process
for Tokyo. This gets underway, in Colomiers, France, on 13/14 July.
The question is, does 'England' compete in this? If 'England' does
not go to Colomiers, does 'Scotland' or 'Wales' go, or, does a 'Team
GB' squad travel?
What will happen with qualifying for the Olympics?
If
they don't, will Team GB be able to compete in the European
Repechage, some time in 2020, to get to Tokyo. I feel decisions on
this need to be made – and soon.
Leaving
aside the high performance aspect of Sevens, I honestly feel we
really ought to be treating the short game with a lot more
seriousness here in Scotland. I have written before, there used to be
District sevens series all over Scotland. Here in the West, (from
memory), the Spring Sevens series was something like: Allan Glen's,
Greenock Wanderers, Glasgow University, Ayr and Glasgow Accies (or
was it High School?) The Glasgow Accies Sevens, in the 1970s,
attracted big-money sponsorship from one of the whisky companies and
got a terrific media presence as a result.
I
know there were similar circuits in Edinburgh and in both the North
and Midlands parts of Caledonia. Why, here in the West, there was
even a lower grade series, going to such great tournaments as
Wigtownshire - where the post tournament bacchanalia was of epic
proportions. There was a rule: what happens at Wigtownshire, stays at
Wigtownshire.
Why
cannot we resurrect these local circuits, with the Kings of the
Sevens as a sort of Grand Prix series. What about making the Kings
of the Sevens a grand, two-day end of season jamboree at Murrayfield,
with additional skills competitions. Surely the SRU could come up
with something exciting.
In
his TOL piece,
Barney touched on the uneven spread of fixtures over the season. As
it stands, in the new season, should we get a mild winter with few
games called off, most clubs will be done and dusted by the start of
February. OK, Sevens could take care of April and early May for most
clubs. But, what of those players who don't like Sevens, and don't
want to play?
I
know there are some within HQ who are with me on this, so, why not
Tens – rugby's unloved child. Coming as it does as a mid-way point
between Sevens and Fifteens, I believe Tens, if the format was
tweaked, could become a very good platform for promoting the Scottish
style of playing. Could we not bring Tens into the season – perhaps
in August and early September, as a means of getting players fit and
used to running about. Then switch to 15-a-side, get the leagues out
of the way by the end of March.
In
April and May, those who wished could play Sevens, the rest could
play Tens tournaments – I am sure this would work, and, bring up
the skills levels. We cannot, as is so often the case in Scotland,
stick with what has aye
been. We
need to try things, be bold and really sell rugby as a sport for all.
FINALLY, that's another week past, and still no response from Sean Lineen or Zoe Paige in response to my questions regarding Super-6. It really takes them a long time to get their brains into gear at BT Murrayfield.
Interesting AA
ReplyDeleteThe OSL piece was penned by Alan Lorimer.
How we approach the different forms of the game and when we play those versions will be key to our success/survival as a sport.
DOH!! I forgot it was my old mate Alan what wrote the Sevens piece. But, Barney runs the site, nothing goes in without his say-so, so, I can still name-check him.
DeleteWe do need to look at the season's structure I feel.
Hmm, a form of rugby with a little bit more contact than touch. It's a game for sprinters.
ReplyDelete10s I've got more time for, and I can see murrayfield going for this idea, for as you suggest, it fits with the idea of keeping the ball alive, and staying away from technical set piece stuff that we are struggling with.