YESTERDAY,
with
the English Premiership Rugby final, The Derby, the Champions League
final and finally – although strictly speaking, in UK terms it was
an event which happened in the early hours of today (Sunday) morning
– Anthony Joshua's World Heavyweight title fight, was widely billed
as Super Sporting Saturday.
The
big winners were, of course, those many Scousers who were on the Van
Dijk double – Anthony to win The Derby, Virgil the Champions
League; and, if he handles his upset victory correctly Andy Ruiz
Junr. But, that boxing upset apart, there was little to get excited
about.
I
watched the rugby from Twickenham. I have been an admirer of Exeter
since I watched them beat a good Glasgow side at Millbrae, in a
pre-season game some years back. I don't like the way they tend to
over-play the one-pass grunt and grind game, because, in the likes of
Henry Slade and Jack Nowell, they have free-running backs who excite, but, that's a minor criticism.
Hoggy - in concert with
Exeter
should be worth watching next season, since, with Hoggy added to the
mix, they will have three of the best broken field runners in world
rugby. If they can unleash them at will, they could well transform
the English Premiership's reputation for dull, stick it up your
jumper rugby.
Jack Nowell, will make Exeter even-more dangerous next season
But,
will Hoggy be enough to close the gap on Saracens, who have surely
now banished all doubts and are the top team in Europe. I would love
to see a Saracens v whichever New Zealand club emerges as the best of
Super Rugby show-down. However, it will not happen in this World Cup
year.
I
honestly thought, an hour into yesterday's Twickenham match, Exeter
would finally do it. But, having given his daft side too-much
traction up until then, Maro Itoje suddenly found the game which has
already earmarked him as a future England captain, to take charge and
drag Sarries over the line to what had seemed an unlikely win.
The
lesson from these two clubs is about getting the system correct. Both
clubs rely on a strong Academy system, continuity of employment and
doing the simple things well. Sure, they will buy-in established
talent when necessary, but, at both clubs, most of their squad have
come through the Academy – where former stars such as Kelly Brown
at Sarries, knock the club ethos into the wannabees.
There
is a lesson there which I hope the SRU will buy into for Edinburgh
and Glasgow. Certainly, by the way Glasgow is operating: Pete Murchie
and Pat McArthur at Ayr; Ryan Grant and Ruaridh Jackson at Glasgow
Accies; Chris Fusaro and Zander Fagerson, they are to an extent
trying to offset a lack of finance, by encouraging stalwarts of the
Warrior nation to get out to the clubs and spread the word, Warriors
are taking the first steps in this – but, more can and needs to be
done in this field.
I
might be wrong, but, I feel the long-term future of Scottish Rugby
would be brighter if, instead of “forging alliances” with the
likes of Nice and Old Glory, alliances which, to the body of the
Scottish Rugby kirk seem pointless, TCD put that money into the
domestic game, refranchising those parts which currently seem
disenfranchised, making the club guys feel wanted and encouraging
them to get on-board and heading for a common goal.
Because,
at the moment, there is discord. With the paid help – and, some
suggest the elected officials at Murrayfield – seemingly obsessed
with the professional side of the game, to the detriment of the
grass-roots.
SPEAKING
of
the grass-roots, the great John “Pundy” Thorburn directed me last
week to an interesting offer on the Welsh websirte dai
sport. I
appreciate, you cannot realistically equate what goes on in other
countries with what is happening in Scotland, we all have our
differences, but, the dai sport piece, headlined: “The
Big Rugby problem – cash in or drop out? Wales must decide,” is
well-worth seeking-out and reading.
I picked out one interesting
fact from it. Talking about troubled South African rugby, the article
tells us, 57% of their income comes from broadcasting deals, 26% from
sponsorships and only 17% from Test match gate takings and grants.
It would be nice if we knew how
these figures stacked-up against the SRU accounts. And, in this area,
can I once again urge somebody, perhaps a disillusioned CA somewhere
from one of our clubs, to have the balls to get up at the AGM and
badger TCD, MH33 and the minions to be more open as to the SRU
accounts.
We need to blow away the smoke,
smash the mirrors and get the books opened to the representatives of
the clubs.
International rugby's crown
jewels in the northern hemisphere is the Six Nations. The argument
is, this competition is being sold too-cheaply to the BBC and ITV. I
would suggest, for as long as England is obsessed with their football
Premiership – and this obsession may not survive the fall-out from
a NO-DEAL Brexit, trust me on this. But, for as long as the status
quo survives, with football as king, rugby is not going to get much
more out of the purveyors of “cooncil telly.”
In any case, while there is no
doubt, free-to-air television will deliver larger TV audiences, it's
rugby on the cheap. Divide £X millions from a TV deal by Y millions
of viewers, and I bet you get a very low figure.
But divide £A millions from a
pay-to-view or subscription deal, by perhaps B hundreds of thousands
of viewers, and suddenly rugby is paying its way. It is then up to
the game to make itself more attractive, to attract more subscribers
and bring in more money.
Another point I garnered from
the dai sport article was this: “Increasingly, it appears
that those clubs with wealthy backers – like Merthyr and Pontypool
– will flourish. But is that what rugby at semi-pro, part-time
level should be all about?”
Reflecting on Super-6, or even
our Tennent's Premiership, it is at the moment all but impossible to
see such a situation arising in Scotland, whereby individual clubs
are owned by one person with deep pockets.
Perhaps the S6 and Premiership
clubs should take cognisance of something I was told lang syne by the master of
raising sponsorship – Sir Jackie Stewart, who told me. “It's
a lot easier to find ten people to each give you £1000 in
sponsorship, than to find one person to give you £10,000.”
So, my advice to our clubs is,
get out there and sell yourselves.


Wishful thinking to imagine that Exeter would beat Sarries....
ReplyDeleteAnd hey - loads of power stuff and phases, but didn't Saracens exploit space magnificently and score on both wide outsides to overhaul the SW pretenders?
Credit where credit is due, I reckon.
Saracens do play an interesting brand of rugby which when it hits its straps is exhilarating.
ReplyDeleteGiven the talent they have on their roster you would expect them to as well.
The question is - how does a club like Sarries afford that team and the infrastructure to make it work? Yes they have a hugely beneficent owner but I still dont understand how they can pay for those players within the salary cap. That the RFU are supposedly investigating them for possible breaches perhaps begins to explain it.
One issue for me is the nature of their structure.
That's an entirely different, though related issue!
DeleteFirst up - the RFU is not investigating Saracens. Secondly, Premiership Rugby is looking into Saracens owner Nigel Wray's individual extra-mural property-owning & business arrangements with players and past players. The DSC himself has frequently had his own personal business interests outwith any employment, including the SRU - indeed, the DSC was for a period, a co-investor in an Asian gold-mining company with the very same Nigel Wray!
Saracens have previously insisted that they have disclosed all of their investments with players, with Wray claiming last month that “we proactively disclose co-investments when they occur, even though we are under no obligation to do so”. Premiership Rugby stated that “clubs are required to supply information to the Premiership Rugby salary cap manager on any arrangements between a connected party and a player which might constitute payment or benefit in kind”.
Wray has staunchly defended his business ventures with his players and last month issued a lengthy statement, again insisting that his co-investments are not part of Premiership’s salary regulations. “I recognise that in some quarters these co-investments are perceived as part of the Premiership salary regulations,” he said. “They are not. Investment is not salary.”