YOU have to admire the Rugby Football Union. I appreciate the name resonates with the time of that body's inception - when Britannia really did rule the waves, and most of the globe; when there was a certainty around London that here was indeed, the centre of the Universe and that God was indeed an Englishman.
Absolutely no need to put English before the three words Rugby Football Union - of course not, theirs was the only one.
Nearly 150 years later, the world is a much different place. England is a peninsula, the greater portion of a small offshore European island. Of course, the English politicians still think of themselves as running a global power, England still gets involved in global conflicts - but these they can no longer afford, in spite of the input to their treasury from the ungrateful Jocks above them on the map.
The RFU is still involved in the global body running their sport, only, today it is adminstered from Dublin and the Celts, the colonials whom the English once patronised and those damned French, not to mention Argentinians and Italians now seem hell-bent on denying England the say in anything.
But one thing is constant - the ability of the "57 Old Farts" (copyright W Carling Esq) to get it wrong, as witness their convolutions as regards Sir Clive Woodward, their ability to misplace, lose and generally undermine administrators and their frequent ability to make use of something seen in association rather than Rugby Union football - the own goal.
Admit it, let's all laugh at England is a game we all love in the Celtic fringes of this green and pleasant land, but seldom have I laughed as much as during the current furore over England's "away" strip for the forth-coming World Cup.
Bad enough that the strip is black; but it is the basic premis of an "away" strip that gets me.
You would think, somewhere within Twickenham, there was somebody with enough knowledge of Rugby Union practices to say: "Hang on, we don't actually need a change strip - and in any case, in Rugby Union, when there is a clash of colours the protocol is that the HOME team changes (Scotland/France/Italy all wear blue but in the Six Nations the home side always changes).
"If we are, by some luck of the draw, the home side against Fiji in the World Cup, then we will need a change strip, but let's face that hurdle when we come to it".
But no, guided probably by some budding genius in either theirs, or more likely Nike's PR department, a black strip has been produced. This is nothing more than a blatant money-grabbing exercise; the strip produced in the certain knowledge that the poor saps who will follow England to New Zealand for the World Cup will buy the new item in enough quantity to further swell the RFU coffers.
Mind you, I fear that after a couple of days of: "Thanks for the compliment guys" and "Good on you Poms - imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" in the Land of the Long White Cloud, the black shirts will be quietly put away and the old white shirts will be back on the pbi's backs.
I see the new shirts will be unveiled in the pre-World Cup warm-up match against Wales - how many on either side will be smashed out of the World Cup in that one? A "friendly" it will not be. In any case - why? It's not as if England need to change. But, once again, money doesn't so much talk as shout. Suppose Wales win - might the "unlucky" black strips be binned?
I cannot help re-calling how, not that long ago, when the touring Fijians turned up to play England at Twickenham, flying in the face of protocol, England insisted THEY HAD TO WEAR WHITE - after all, they were England, and the visiting Fijians were forced to change into a black and white hooped "Barbarians" number.
That's more like it, arrogant England we can all live with - that sort of stuff makes them indeed: 'the common enemy' which has ever been England's role in the sporting life of the world.
Cheap publicity stunts built around money-grabbing "away" strips do nothing to change that mind set from elsewhere around the globe.