IN
WRITING this
blog, I have long believed –
Scottish Rugby cannot afford full-time, professional rugby. Such is
our national infatuation with football, there simply is not a
domestic market for paid egg-chasing.
Perhaps
we could, as is the case in England, somehow find sufficient
mega-rich rugby fans, willing to bank-roll enough professional teams
to make a go of it, but, the odds on this happening are ridiculously
long. If there had been such men about, they would surely have stuck
their heads above the parapet some time between August, 1995 and
today.
But,
they haven't, so, the SRU has had to divert scarce financial
resources towards keeping most of our best talent in Scotland and
playing together for Edinburgh and Glasgow.
Next
year, 2020, will mark 25 years since the game went open. Right now,
World Rugby is arguing about introducing a new World League, at
international level, which should be up and running by then. Maybe
they should, while they are at it, go further and examine how going
open has affected the broader grass-roots game.
Because,
we see numbers dropping badly in the game's southern hemisphere power
houses. One New Zealand provincial union, North Harbour, is stopping
representative rugby at Under-14 level, while playing numbers at
schools level in the Land of the Long White Cloud are dropping.
Further
up the food chain, the lure of the fabled black jersey is not enough
of a pull to prevent younger players heading for the riches of the
English and French leagues.
Australian
rugby is in a mess, ditto South African. In Europe, the drive for
success in France has seen them mimic the management model of the
English football Premiership, to the extent good young French players
are struggling to get a regular game, and this is impacting on the
national side.
In
England, only Exeter Chiefs of the top clubs made any money in the
last season for which figures are available, and we find, lower down
their fiefdom, whole counties are opting-out of a league system which
does not fit their needs.
Ireland
alone of the major nations, appears to have their act together, but,
even here there are rumblings of discontent, while in Wales, the
perennial battle for the soul of the game, between those who believe
in regionalism as the way to go, and the traditional club men, who
are seeing great, long-established clubs such as Pontypool and Neath
struggling.
Now,
this week, Wales Online reported the possibility of the Welsh Rugby
Union scrapping one of their four PRO14 Regions; the suggestion being
that Dragons, who were rescued by the WRU last season and Cardiff
would be allowed to continue, while the Scarlets and Ospreys might be
amalgamated into a West Wales region.
There
are also plans, apparently, to augment the North Walian RGC 1404 team
into a development squad, with suggestions they would have two
regions in the PRO14, and two regions, one of them in North Wales, as
development teams.
So,
we are not alone in fearing for the future, although to be fair to
the SRU, like it or lump it they have a plan – Super-6.
IN
MY dotage,
I find I need some background noise and diversion when I am working.
It's like the background “white noise” of an editorial floor, and
it certainly now need that, while beavering away in what my cheeky
second grandson refers to as: “The Papa Cave.”
One
of my diversions is to have a TV film or a catch-up programme
playing; and, of late, I have been working through a new series of
ESPN 30 for 30 films, available on BT Sport. And, in doing this, I
think I have maybe found the answer to the future of Super-6.
Super-6
will be a development league. The six clubs will draft the best young
rugby talent in Scotland, the idea being to take the raw talent,
polish these rough diamonds and send them to the PRO14. Now, that is
the Scottish rugby equivalent of the American college sports system –
where colleges offer scholarships to the best high school talent in
the country and hopefully in time, send them to “The Show,” the
major leagues.
With
this in mind, it is interesting to note how many of the college Head
Coaches who have been the subject of some of the ESPN films have been
long-reigning, running their programmes for in some cases two or
three decades – longevity which compares more than favourably with
the short-termism of most areas of sport.
Sure,
these guys have to be good coaches, able to organise and motivate
their teams, but, perhaps more-importantly, to recruit the right
players. And, looking down the road to the future of Super-6, it may
be that recruiting will be perhaps the major skill.
Even
in the Tennent's Premiership, which is not a rich league, it's all
about winning, or at the least, in a worse-case scenario, trying to
remain in the league. With Super-6, which is a ring-fenced
competition, with no relegation, the requirements are different.
The
assumption is, the clubs will be prepared to tolerate a poor season,
one in which perhaps a raw team fails to click – if the signs are
there, things will be a lot better next season; the kids will mature,
results will improve and one or two will make it into The Show.
Just
which of the six, young, ambitious coaches who will be in-charge next
season goes on to establish a coaching dynasty will be interesting.
It's a new development in Scottish rugby and watching how things
evolve will, I am sure, be interesting.
And
already, one possible coaching dynasty has failed to get off the
first tee – with Stevie Lawrie named yesterday as Roddy Grant's
replacement as Edinburgh's Forwards Coach – that move, of course,
being just about the worst-kept secret in the game. And, if the
rumours are true, it will not be the last such change.
Finally,
on this, can I suggest the six coaches might learn something from
watching some of these ESPN 30 for 30 films.




