For instance, when the Hungarian Communist government decided, in around 1950, to bring a particularly-gifted squad of players together in one national "Superclub", so they could play together week-in, week-out and thus perform better when they put on the national scarlet strip, they faced a couple of problems.
The obvious club to base this new superclub on was Fernecsvaros, the top Hungarian club of the time. But that club didn't meet the idealogical doctrine of the regime. MTK Budapest, the next possible club was likewise disqualified, but for different idealogical reasons, so they picked a third club, Kimset, which became Honved - "the people's club".
This was the club of Puskas, Boczik, Grocsics etc - the rest is history.
Imagine if a Scottish government had tried something similar. Obviously, for the same, different reasons, Celtic and Rangers, even Hearts and Hibs would have been ruled-out, so Partick Thistle might well have become our superclub. I know, it makes no sense.
But, take the superclub concept into rugby, and we have what happened when the game went professional. OK, the SRU managed to much it up big time, but, I suggest, having our betterScottish players playing week-in, week-out, SHOULD have been good for Scottish rugby.
Why hasn't it? How long do you have for all the reasons?
Let's just leave it. I suppose a totalitarian SNP government, post-independence, might do a North Korea and close the border with England, keeping all our best rugby players at home and giving them a standard of living way above the rest of the population. Allowing them to play for Edinburgh and Glasgow in the Pro12 and for Scotland and in the process producing a World Cup-winning team which rolls over Saxon and All Black alike, pulverises the Paddies, whacks the Welsh, F***s the Frogs, tobers the Tallies, stuffs the Saffers, obliterates the Ockers and annihalates the Argies, while doing a good Krakatoan impression on the poor Pacific Islanders. But, I am not holding my breath on that one.
We really ought to be able to produce two good, competitive professional teams, capable of winning in professional club rugby and providing us with an international side which can compete with the very best. Or is it, as is often suggested, that there is something in the Scottish psyche, which prevents us from winning at team games, for all the good individual sportsmen and women we produce?
I know Glasgow are going well at least in the Pro12 and can accept that they got a bad draw, for the stage in their development they are at, in this season's Heineken Cup. But, whatever is going wrong at Edinburgh, it needs sorting out, quickly.
ALLAN Massie had a good piece in Saturday's Scotsman, in which he wondered at the quality of the imports recruited by Edinburgh this season. I couldn't agree more. I feel, perhaps, time is running out for Michael Bradley at Murrayfield.
Apparently Brian Redpath is heading for the exit at Sale..........
That said, one hears that wee Chic's jacket is on a shoogly nail at the Greenyards..........
A wee home-coming, perhaps in an advisory role to Chalmers, followed, after a short but suitable period of time, by a call to Murrayfield. I wonder, might this be a goer?
SPEAKING of Melrose's current inability to win at home, which has all but taken them out of the RBS Premiership title reckoning. This shows what a terrific competition the Premiership has quickly become.
I watched Ayr beat Boroughmuir on Saturday and this game was a lot tighter than the result might indicate. 'Muir are languishing in the league basement, but they are a lot better than their results might indicate. They have some terrific young forwards, plus the great experience of Sean Crombie and Ali Davidson and they gave the Ayr pack a good going-over.
However, in the end, the pace of the Ayr backs won the day, but it was a terrific game and typical of an under-rated competition. Come on SRU, I know you've got most of your eggs in the pro teams basket, but, the Premiership is a brilliant competition, well worth talking-up. DO SO.