LIFE WAS simpler in the sepia-tinted 1950s and 1960s in which I grew up. Emerging as we were from the mental turmoil of 17 straight losses for the national side, the Scotland teams of the time were never under preessure to win Five Nations titles, with or without a Grand Slam. We didn't have World Cups to worry about and whether your club was in the National League or not wasn't down to results as much as keeping the likes of Jock Wemyss, Norman Mair, John Downie and a young Bill McLaren on-side. What writers such as David Barnes, Rob Robertson, Mark Palmer and Alasdair Reid would give for that level of power today.
Scotland, and some say this is still true today, was largely run by a small number of very-influential people. In Scotland at large at that time, the Westminster-based Secretary of State for Scotland had the sort of power once vested in the Viceroy of India. Lord George MacLeod was believed to run the Church of Scotland, regardless of whoever was Moderator of the General Assembly that year. Sir George Graham ran the SFA, and while John Law, like James Aikman-Smith before him was the seemingly all-powerful Secretary of the SRU, in the 1950s, whatever John MacDonald Bannerman, Lord Bannerman of Kildonan said went, the word of that stalwart of Old Anniesland was Law.
You might note, all those name-checked above were Scottish, how unlike the situation today, where our positions of power have generally been colonialised, to be done by England's place-men, and in making that accusation, I include the high heid yins of the Scottish National Party. But, this is a Rugby Union blog, so I want to focus on the current position within the SRU.
We are in the midst of an Interregnum. The Supreme Leader hasn't died, but, he has left the building and we are waiting to see who the courtiers will turn to next to tell them what to do. I honestly don't know where we go from here. I don't think, indeed I am utterly convinced we dare not allow it to happen, we must not see the next CEO operating in the: "My way or the highway" management style of the last incumbent. Mind you, should he or she be single-minded and ruthless in cutting-out the considerable amount of deadwood in the Murrayfield forest, get the finances sorted and attract the first-rate Director of Rugby we desperately require, then a lot of slack will be played out as regards management style.
It will not be easy, but, we really need a total re-think as to how we organise and manage the game up here. Getting this done will be no easy task, particularly since, as was seen by the ridiculous decision to scrap, rather than repair Super Rugby, the forces of Ayebeenism and, Don't Rock the Boat seem to be shouting loudest in the game's corridors of power.
Speaking of which, a wee nugget from Silver Saturday. One of the Silverbacks of the game in his particular part of Scotland was there to see the club he helped found compete in one of the finals. He was so-disgusted at the level of post-match hospitality supplied to the players, so he told his Club Rugby Board member - this isn't good enough.
The response: "That's the sort of attitude which bankrupted Scottish Rugby." Clad in their SRU-supplied suits, worn over their SRU shirts and ties, and enjoying the plush hospitality which accompanies one of the posh seats - they hover above us, often doing pigeon impressions.
Again harking back to the 1950s, I was once one of 65,000 fans inside Hampden Park for a Scottish Junior Cup Final. You couldn't get that many people into today's Hampden, but, even back then, the old ground was only half full. This year's Junior Cup Final will do well to attract a crowd of 5000 - that's how much interest in this particular fixture has waned. The SRU claimed an attendance of 25,000 at the 2018 Silver Saturday. Surveying the sea of empty seats as I watched the Hawick v Edinburgh Academical game on Saturday, I couldn't tell you the attendance, but, it was well short of 25,000.
Apparently there was a live stream of all the finals. I certainly saw one of the Cumnock game, after the local paper, for which I once worked, but which hasn't covered the club's first XV games for years, ran a link in their Facebook page. Had I known there was a live stream, I would have watched it. Yet another addition to the extremely-lengthy list of failures of Buddy and his Elves in the SRU's useless Communications Department.
I doubt if even recalling "Fireworks Phil" would put bums on seats, but,clearly, while on-paper, Silver Saturday is a good idea, we probably need a rethink, and strategic thinking hasn't been much in evidence in EH12 of late.
Somebody on The Offside Line's BTL comments - where David Barnes' dissection of all that was wrong on Saturday should be required reading inside Murrayfield - suggested cutting the number of finals - by separate Silver Saturdays for the Men's and Women's games. That might be worth looking at. I note too, the way some of the lesser finals have been Hived-off to Edinburgh's home ground. If we are not going to be able to attract enough fans to even fill one-third of the National Stadium, why not play all the finals on the Hive's all-weather pitch?
The players will still get to change in the main dressing rooms. The Alickadoos get to see inside some of the corporate facilities and as for the fans: they wil be inside the Murrayfield campus, with the bonus - they will be closer to the action and a smaller crowd, in a smaller stadium, will provide a better atmosphere. I once did a stadium announcer gig for a Scotland v Ireland Under-16 Basketball international, in the Games Hall at Cumnock Academy. From memory, we crammed-in 500 fans, who nearly took the roof off the building with the atmosphere they created. You don't need big crowds in big stadia to create an atmosphere; and you certainly don't want small crowds scattered around a huge bowl - it doesn't work.
I actually think we have maybe too-many layers in the club game: Bowl, Shield, League Cup, Scottish Cup. To my mind that's perhaps two too-many. Let the Regional League teams compete for one trophy and have a separate trophy for the National League sides. If a club thinks it is good enough to have National League status, then, in cup ties, they can face other National League sides.
We should also look at seeding cup competitions. to give more opportunities for giant-killing acts and the added interest these cause.
I fear the result at the close of the current interregnum might well be, rather than a new broom sweeping clean, a shuffling of the deckchairs as the SRU Titanic continues to head for its collision with the iceberg. I hope I am wrong and we see the changes we need, but, Ah hae ma doots if these will come any time soon.
THIS SECOND segment of this post is, to an extent, tied to Part One, above. There is a feeling abroad that one of the most-significant problems at the top of the new CEO's "To Do" pile will be the refurbishment of Murrayfield. The word on the streets is that the big stadium needs an awful lot of cash spent on it to bring it back up to scratch. However, with that £10.5 million loss hanging over their heads, funding the necessary refurbishment work will be a huge problem.
A wee aside in all this, is the fact Leinster has managed to sell-out the 82,000 capacity Croke Park, Dublin, for this weekend's Investec Champions Cup semi-final against Northampton Saints. Taking this game to the GAA-owned Croke Park rather than to The Aviva Stadium has got people talking.
The question is: do the big national sports governing bodies reall need to each have their own stadium - would it not be better if we had one truly National Stadium? After all, if Wales can manage to play both their big Football and Rugby Union internationals at the Principality Stadium, so, why cannot we in Scotland have a single truly NATIONAL STADIUM?
Why not? There is no rational reason why we should have the 51,866 capacity Hampden Park for Football and the 67,144 capacity Murrayfield for Rugby Union. Common sense suggests we have one truly national stadium. However, this cuts across the curse of Scotland in politics, in sport and indeed in so much of civic life - clannishness and self-interest.
The thought process appears to be: "We are a big, important, national institution, we MUST have our own ground." In addition, the power source in Rugby Union is in Edinburgh, while in Football, is is Glasgow, so, neither party appears willing to demolish their stadium - both of which could bring in a massive sum if the site was sold for housing or commercial use - take the profit then downsize their HQ, but, at a cost of having to be beholden to another sporting body for their home game for internationals.
Ideally, we might see a government-owned or funded truly National stadium built on a greenfield site. That might happen in an Independent Scotland, but, let's be honest:
. Independence is a long way off
. It would be costly
. Such a stadium would be well down the To Do list for the first Independent Scottish government
. The High Heid Yins of both the SFA and the SRU would surely oppose such a move.
