A GUID NEW YEAR TAE ANE AN AWE -
MAY 2022 BE A BETTER YEAR THAN THE LAST TWO
NOW, LET'S GET GOING
THE GREATEST living song-writer spoke for us all, when he wrote:
“and I'll trade all my tomorrows, for a single yesterday – holding Bobbie's body close to mine.” Old KK got it in one – we all have regrets, what might have beens, coulda, woulda, shoulda moments. Mine is, I never put in the supposed10,000 hours of practice to produce a good professional, otherwise, it might have been me and not Alan Rough who got all those Scotland caps.
Well, let's make this one of Rugby Union's precepts – that, right at the start of their 10,000 hours of practice, young players learn to tackle properly – BELOW THE HIPS.
I cannot claim the credit for coming up with what is perhaps, a statement of the obvious. I read about the idea in The Guardian, where the notion is being advanced by that deep thinker on the game – Eddie Jones.
Wee Eddie is growing on me. OK, he may have chosen to throw in his lot with the sporting equivalent of Master Race Are Us, but, he knows his stuff. He is suggesting in Under-12 rugby, the tackle height should be lowered to below the hips, to encourage the kids to learn proper technique: arms wrapped, head behind the torso. And, by teaching proper technique at an early age, hopefully there will be fewer head trauma in the game in later life.
I am 100% with Wee Eddie on this one. And how good it is to see one of the leading coaches pushing this initiative. Mind you, the question is: will the Old Farts in the blazers listen?
I can see but one drawback to this. Sure, if it works, we will produce future generations of players who have had the basics ingrained from an early age, and who can tackle properly. Then they will take-up professional careers and bad coaches will coach the good habits out of them.
They will enter an environment where the watchwords are #whatever it takes, just so long as the ball carrier is stopped.
Proper technique - doesn't matter
Player safety doesn't matter - just don't lose.
I fear it will take more than the excellent notion of teaching proper technique and lowering the tackle height, to at least reduce the dangers inherent in a collision sport such as rugby. We could also make the breakdown offside line one metre back from the rear-most body on either side. At least then, the tackler would have time and room in which to set him or her self for the collision.
I caught the final five minutes or so of the Harlequins Women v Wasps Women match at Twickenham, on BT Sport. Wasps' hooker was red-carded for a head-high tackle, which was the result of abysmal technique; the girl could, in my view, should, have got a lot lower than she did. Then we have the commentators giving it the “poor girl” act. The girls who play at that level are being well-paid for their trouble; they prepare to a professional degree – there ought to be no need for such red cards.
The fact red cards for high tackles still occur in even semi-professional rugby speaks of a game which is not taking professional standards of preparation seriously enough. This lack of professionalism will come back to bite rugby in the bum in the years to come.
And, there's another thing which Jones highlighted in his Guardian interview – the fact, in the Northern Hemisphere, players tend to play around 35 games per season, whereas in the Southern Hemisphere, they tend to play 25 games per season. Let's also adopt the NFL watchwords: fewer games, better quality. It could work.
WE HAVE a wee think tank going here in the Scottish Rugby Philosophy department, where we discuss matters of mutual interest around the game. Some of our thoughts and discussions occasionally find their way onto the blog.
Left Field, one of our wiser sages, recently raised the issue of the malign affect Rugby League practices have brought into Union – which got us thinking.
Back in the amateur era, received wisdom in Union was – you attacked space, which was a somewhat chancy operation. The attacker might become isolated, possession would be lost and the opposition then had their opportunity to attack against a disorganised defence.
In League meanwhile, received wisdom was, you attacked opponents, looking for speedy second phase off the “play the ball” rule to utilise a mis-match or an overlap off which you might score.
League defences were more-structured and better-organised than the defences in Union, so, when League coaches began to drift across, they brought their habits with them and in attack, Union began to ape the 13-a-side game, with defences ranged across the field and the concept of setting-up a ruck, off which you could attack with quick ball, spread. Against this, defences concentrated on slowing the attacking team's possession, to allow the defensive line to re-form.
Suddenly, free-flowing Union began to more and more resemble war of attrition League.
So, how do we reverse this?
WATCHING the Boxing Day clash between Bristol Bears and Leicester Tigers was interesting. There were 15 scrums in the game. With only 1 of the first 13 actually completed. Scrums 14 and 15 were let go, but, earlier in the game, they would surely have been, at the very least, re-set. I think by that point, 79 minutes in, referee Tom Foley just wanted to get off the park.
The BT Sport team were full of praise for referee Foley, for his patience and tolerance. Rubbish. I was longing for him to do what Nigel Owens did, a few years back, when he yellow carded Warriors' Ryan Grant and Ospreys' Adam Jones, after the first six scrums in a game at Scotstoun were a collective mess.
At the time, Grant and Jones were the best players in the British Isles in their respective positions. This was not the case at Ashton Gate on Boxing Day. Here the bother was largely being caused by Bears' Kyle Sinckler and Tigers' Ellis Genge, who, certainly in this game, reaffirmed the wide-spread belief that neither can scrum for toffee.
If he had yellow carded that pair in the first half, Mr Foley would have had a much easier and more-enjoyable afternoon – and so would all of us watching. On the same subject, of setting scrums, can I repeat something I wrote earlier this year:
The most-often ignored Law in the book is surely Law 19 (4): “Teams must be ready to form a scrum within 30 seconds of the mark being made.”
If a team is not ready, the sanction is a free kick to the opposition. I raised the subject of that Law with a leading refereeing official at the time, his response: “Ah! Well, Yes.....”
Bath v Gloucester at The Rec. This finished in a thumping win for the Cherry and Whites, and another disaster for Bath. This got me thinking; I know we are critical of football boards of directors, when they sack managers or coaches after a couple of defeats, but, while congratulating Bath on the way they are backing Director of Rugby Stuart Hooper, given the way they've not played in the first half of the season, why is he – even if he is a club icon – still in-post?
Such a pity I have to talk about English games, but, on the whole, I'd rather be living under the ultra-cautious Scottish government than that bunch of Old Etonian chancers down at Westminster, even if it does mean we don't have the Glasgow v Edinburgh double-header to cheer us up in the deep midwinter.
THE SCOG – that's the SRU's Standing Committee on Governance has a new Chairman. Gavin McColl QC has stood down from the role and been replaced by another of Scotland's top legal brains – Professor Lorne Crerar CBE.
An Old Anniesland man, Lorne was good enough to play for Glasgow and the Scotland Under-21 team, before injury ended his playing career, which led to him becoming a top referee out of GHK, while in the day job, he ran one of Scotland's top law firms, Harper Macleod for 30 years. Emeritus Professor of Law at his Alma Mater, Glasgow University.
Weel-kent across the rugby world, Lorne is an excellent replacement for Gavin McColl and if anyone can assist President Ian Barr in navigating the still choppy waters of the Governance Review, it is surely Lorne Crerar.
That's the first significant event of 2022, it will not be the last.