“CLUNKY” IS the adjective of choice from the boys in the cheap press seats at Scotstoun on Friday night. A win is a win is welcome, but, the Warriors' defeat of Benetton is further proof, in professional sport you don't have to be perfect every week, you merely have to keep winning – which Glasgow did.
From in front of the television set, the first half was entertaining, with Warriors emerging second to the fired-up visitors. Even then, I wasn't overly concerned; one or two of the home team hadn't seen much action of late and it showed, while I well knew, Franco Smith may not have a hair dryer, but, he is Fergie Class when it comes to turning things around at the break after a disappointing opening period.
Thus it proved, as Warriors, playing with the wind, blew their visitors away in the second period. Debutant Jack Watson claimed the Man of the Match prize, while Warriors' bench made a serous impact. Some of the lesser lights shone and thus, the team consolidated their place at the top of the log and, as the clocks change and we stroll into spring, life is good for Glasgow.
It needs to be, we are moving into the sharp end of the season and, in spite of the handicaps imposed by the SRU's continuing struggles to run a menauge, there is cause for optimism among the Warrior Nation.
Young Watson aside, I was impressed by both youthful nines, by Ollie Smith's continuing emergence as a class act, by the control of Dan Lancaster and by the commitment of the three young locks.
The line out stuttered somewhat, but, they got over this and, all told, it was in the end a quietly-satisfactory night, capped by 99-year old Murray Kirkwood handing over the Italian-Scottish Shield. This may be one of the game's lesser baubles, but, the way this Glasgow squad is grinding out wins, it may not be the final silverware of this season.
SATURDAY saw another disappointing loss for Edinburgh, yet another loss in a season which seems to be going from bad to worse. I honestly don't know what the answer to Edinburgh's travails is. Is it a case of good players being badly coached, or average players being coached as well as they can be? Or is it something else? I honestly cannot get a handle on that team.
Mind you, I feel I am not alone in being perplexed at Edinburgh's problems. I get the feeling there are decision-makers within the Murrayfield bubble who don't have a clue either.
HALLS OF FAME are an American concept. Since they have so-little history of their own, they had to come up with something – the Hall of Fame. One thing I will say for Halls of Fame in American Sport is this, they take it seriously.
Nobody, and I mean nobody – you might be just about everyone's notion of another American sporting concept: The G.O.A.T. (Greatest of All Time) but, you aint getting into your sport's Hall of Fame until you have been retired for five years, a period which allows those whose job it is to induct you into the relevant HoF to properly consider your impact on the particular sport.
It's one of the things which annoys me about inductions into Scottish Halls of Fame, that in some cases, players are being inducted whilst still active. To me, this goes against the whole concept of the process.
For instance, just this week Melrose announced that Hollie Davidson was being inducted into their Sevens Hall of Fame. Now, I see nothing wrong with honouring Hollie, what that girl has already done in Rugby Union deserves recognition. But, can we please wait until she hangs-up her whistle before we induct her into Halls of Fame.
She has broken through one or two glass ceilings, and will doubtless break through a few more, but, it's a wee bit early in her career to be giving her this honour.