CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, of which there are many in God's County, were wondering what caused the Fullarton Woods branch of the Still Game Appreciation Society to take off for a jolly in Lanzarote on Sunday.
On Monday, the light flicked on, with the news that Marr's Dougie Steele had copped a three-year ban for a drugs violation. With that coming out, nae wonder the inner cabinet shot the craw. I do feel for Dougie, who must have felt intolerable pressures of some sort, to take such a chance. Please, he made a huge mistake, so, don't throw the lad to the wolves.
I see some of the Unco Guid, the 21st century successors to Burns' Holy Wullie are calling for Marr to be stripped of their 2021-22 Premiership title, citing how, in other sports, such as Athletics at the Olympic Games, gold medals have been removed following positive drugs tests. Certainly, Steele played at full-back in the title-winning team, so, the removal of the title punishment might well be on the table. However, since the Rugby Union protocol appears to hold sanctions to the individuals concerned, at this juncture, I see Marr losing the title as something of a long shot.
The whole case is certainly embarrassing for the Troon club as much as for Dougie Steele – the banter will be good in the club bars of Burns Country, until they find something else to talk about.
THE FOOTBALL WORLD CUP in Qatar has given us rugby chaps something else to be superior about – when you see the pig's breakfast FIFA has made of its great VAR system, and some of the cock-ups they are still coming away with.
The best double act in Qatar, ITV'S Jon Champion and Ally McCoist had great fun this week in one game, when Champion went through the list of VAR officials and their acronyms. It takes about five of them to get decisions wrong – whereas, in Rugby Union, we have one official in the tv truck, who tends to get almost all the decisions correct.
I feel the basis is the question the VAR or TMO is expected to answer. In Rugby Union the question is: “Is there any clear and obvious reason to change the referee's decision/” In football it often seems to be: “We think the ref's got that wrong, convince us to change it.”
Football also doesn't help itself with some of the daft strictures put in place by the law-makers, which of course includes Scotland, since we have a permanent seat on IFAB – the International Football Associations Board – the game's ultimate law-making authority.
When I was playing at school, there was an oft-used term: “The baw played him,” whereby a player would hit the ball with his hand or arm, or, more correctly, the ball hit the hand or arm, the hit occurring so quickly the player didn't have time to get his hand or arm out of the way. Everyone knew what had happened and played-on. Today, however, it is almost as if, if the ball hits a hand or arm, it's a penalty regardless – which is absolute pish. We've seen this once or twice in Qatar, and, when I see that, I cannot help but think – Rugby Union does things better.
ANOTHER ISSUE which has arisen in Qatar has been the way time is being added-on to compensate for time-wasting during games. A great innovation, but, here again, I think football has got it wrong – as has rugby.
At least in Rugby Union, the referee stops the clock in instances of time-wasting, or foinjuries, however, I feel we could do it better. That's why I have long argued for a rewrite to the Laws so that we get 80 minutes of “Ball-in-play time”.
That way, the ball goes out of play, the watch stops until play resumes. The whistle blows for an infringement, or an injury – the clock stops until play resumes. However, at the same time, I think there is a case for a “shot clock” and have the time allowed for various set pieces: setting a scrum or line-out, taking a penalty or a conversion being written into the Laws.
We already have, apparently a demand that the team awarded the put-in has 30 seconds in which to put the ball in. I gather a similar time-scale is in situ regarding a line-out. Have an official time-keeper, even have, as in basketball, a visible shot clock, to allow for monitoring of the break in play – we have a faster, more-entertaining game.
Harder to police and implement, perhaps, might be making sure scrum-halves get the ball away from a ruck within the five seconds of the referee calling: “Use it.” It is, however a fact, universally recognised, that scrum-halves are a law unto themselves.
I SEE The Sassenachs are tying themselves in knots again about what to do with their Championship clubs – a small matter which has become somewhat urgent with the demise of Wasps and Worcester.
As we all know, both clubs went down the Swanee, owing large and small sums to multiple debtors. However, there appears to be an attitude of them being “Too big to fail” these days. I am old enough to remember when London Scottish and Richmond, two of the biggest clubs in the land, over-reached themselves, back in the early days of professionalism. They had to go back to the very bottom and it is to the credit of the real rugby men at both clubs, that they managed to get back as far as The Championship. Perhaps the same treatment might teach Wasps, Worcester and any of the others facing financial melt down that a bit of humility goes a long way.
Mind you, we must remember, the RFU has a long tradition of incompetence, so we need not expect smart answers from there. I see there are already moves afoot to combine the loss-making Wasps and Worcester operations into what will, we must presume, be another loss-making operation based at Sixways, the Worcester ground.
There is also some talk of a Premiership/Championship cup competition involving the remaining Premiership clubs and the more-ambitious Championship outfits; while the others, the diddy teams such as London Scottish and Richmond, go into a new cup competition involving our Super6 clubs and maybe some Welsh club sides.
What to call this? Here's a notion, invite the All-Ireland League clubs in and call it something like – The British and Irish Cup. After all, it was a winner.
I notice, by the way, Northampton Saints crowing about what a great season they had last season – turnover in the region of £20 million, and a whopping £0.3 million profit.
They then added – this was due in no small measure to a one-of £0.5 million insurance pay-out, take that away and they lost £0.2 million.
Gentlemen, gentlemen – Unless it is under-written by the national union, professional rugby is a LOSS-MAKING ENTERPRISE. Accept reality – only the international game pays.


