IT is often suggested that football refereeing in Scotland is a sub-lodge of the Masons. I fear, given recent events, the same accusation might be levelled at rugby union officials
By common consent, the men with the whistle were more than mere bit-part players during the recent Six Nations; and never more so than in the Scotland v Wales match, where Craig Joubert was undoubtedly the Man of the Match.
My media colleagues have been ranting readily since the end of the tournament. A medium-sized Scandinavian forest has fallen to produce the newsprint for the post mortems; but, for all the speculation, comment and analysis, none of the big-money men in the "heavy" newspapers - those whose sports content is not almost exclusively pointed at the English football Premiership - has picked up the telephone and asked some pointed questions of the man who matters most in the whole refereeing debacle, the IRB's Head of Referees, France's Joel Jutge.
Now given that the French, often with legitimate cause, have long criticised the officiating during the Six Nations, and before that the Five Nations. Our Gallic cousins used to suggest there was one set of rules, sorry laws, for the French, and another for the four nations from the British Isles.
I feel, today there is one law for the French, English, Welsh and Irish and another one for the Scots. I have even been forced to subscribe to the view that, since Scotland hasn't had an elite level referee for some years now, it is easy for English, French, Irish and Welsh referees to unduly and unfairly penalise Scottish teams, because there is no Scottish referee to return the favour when officiating on their games.
This, sadly, while going some way to explaining George Clancy and Nigel Owens, doesn't explain Joubert. Wayne Barnes, by the way, is a whole different and individual ball game. Cannot remember who it was - perhaps "Creamy" Telfer - but I have to agree with the leading Scottish figure who said, some two years ago: "One of the certainties of rugby is that at some point, Barnes will screw you".
But, I digress - simple question, why hasn't Brian Moore, or Stephen Jones, or Mick Cleary or Inspector Ackford at least lifted the telephone and asked Mr Jutge: "What the F*** is going on?"
To be fair to the IRB, they are trialing "soft" scrum engagement - basically: front rows in, second row in, back row in, ball in - now shove. It might work, it ought to work, but, while this might solve one of the problems of modern scrummaging, the collapse, will it solve the other - the crooked feed?
Let's hope so. But, while we await the end of the trial, the evaluation and what, if any, change it brings about - shouldn't Mr Jutge do a bit of explaining and then, shouldn't we start to pressurise our national representatives on the IRB to get answers and action?
This would be much-more-productive use of highly-paid journalists' time than in endless speculation about the make-up of the Lions' squad in Australia in general, and the starting XV in the first test in particular.
Because, I guarantee, right now, regardless of how many entries there were from how many journalists in a contest, guaranteeing a £1 million prize, to be won ONLY by whoever correctly forecast that first test starting line-up - it would not be won.
Sort out the scrum, enforce correct feeding, bring back hooking; then, when that is sorted, bring back proper rucking, and we will have gone a long way to sorting-out rugby.
Because, as is the case today, when refereeing issues dominate any game - then that game is in deep doo-dah.