I AM I admit, somewhat addicted to the BTL (Below The Line) comments on The Offside Line. There are a few regulars who comment on just about everything big David Barnes puts up; unfortunately some of them have clearly never heard the old chestnut about better to appear a fool than to open your mouth and demonstrate you are one.
Take one of this week's major stories on TOL, the appointment of Peter Horne as a full-time member of Gregor Townsend's Scotland management team. This appointment has got the anti-Townsend, TCD-haters coming out of the woodwork, and coming up with some real pish.
Now, I am a Horne fan, I liked what the Wee Man did in his short spell with Ayrshire Bulls, and his coach education has clearly grown under Franco Smith at Glasgow Warriors.
Pete may yet prove to be Toony's long-term replacement, although, we did think for a time, that job would go to Mike Blair. But, that's for the future.
Just one thing, while preparing the national team for a Guinness Six Nations or Rugby World Cup campaign is obviously too-much for one man, Toony needs the help off Assistant Coaches – are we maybe going down the American Football road of having too-many coaches?
The SRU claims there are 10,556 adult male players in Scotland. Th national squad is some 40 strong – which means they are the top 0.4% of the eligible players. Do we really need a specialist attack/contact coach for that small and elite a band of players?
Yes, I can justify a battalion of specialist coaches at club level, but, at international level? I blame it all on Sir Clive Woodward. “The Mouth of the South” never claimed to be a great coach, he saw himself as a manager, an enabler, who relied on the likes of Andy Robinson to do the heavy lifting of team preparation, adding the extra bits of finesse, while he (Woodward) oversaw the bigger picture.
This, however, led to the ultimate rugby case of too-many cooks, in the 2005 Lions Tour. One might have hoped, following that fiasco, the game's High Heid Yins would have taken a stand and dispensed with many of the Staff Officers posted to High Command, but no, their numbers appear to grow annually.
OK, I am going into Grumpy Old Git mode here, but, the two most-successful international teams to leave these islands were the British & Irish Lions squads of 1971 and 1974. In '71 the Tour Manager was oor ain Dr Doug Smith – he did the glad-handing and politics; the Coach was Carwyn James – he was hands-on with the players.
Except, James could call on the expertise of players such as Ray McLaughlin, Willie John McBride and Ian McLauchlan, all of whom were bloody good coaches in their own right. For instance, I remember McLauchlan saying: “If Ray McLaughlin, with all his experience, suggested it would be a good move to punch so-and-so in the face, well you had to accept his knowledge.”
In '74 Wales's Alun Thomas was the Manager, Ireland's Syd Millar the Coach, but again, they had experienced players such as McBride, McLauchlan, Fran Cotton, Garth Edwards and a young man with a bright coaching future named Ian McGeechan to help them.
The Wikipedia entry for the last Lions' Tour, to South Africa in 2021 lists 23 ancillary staff members and 43 players. In that tour, the Lions played 9 games.
In 1971, the tour party comprised: The Manager, The Coach, 33 players, a baggage master, a physiotherapist and liaison officers in New Zealand and Australia. They played 26 games.
In 1974, the tour party comprised: The Manager, The Coach, 34 players, a baggage master, a physiotherapist and a liaison officer. They played 22 games.
Going even-further back, in South Africa in 1955, Jeff Butterfield, the England centre, selected as a player, was in charge of team fitness, on account of his degree in Physical Education from Loughborough College.
OK, the game's gone professional today, the Unions definitely take better care of the players, but, can we justify the rise in numbers of support staff?
If you have too-many coaches, you get cases where each specialist coach wants to get his individual message across; so, there is a risk sessions become too-long, too-much information is expected to be ingested and you end up with over-trained, stale players – it has happened.
The Scotland international squad represents 0.4% of the rugby talent in this country, they truly are the cream of the crop, the best of the best – do they really need five specialist coaches? Surely by the time they have reached international level, they should know how to play the game. Short, sharp sessions, to get the team patterns sorted-out, that ought to suffice in my book.
Mind you, we should maybe grateful. Out of interest I had a look on the Dallas Cowboys' website. The Cowboys - “America's Team” are currently on a bit of a downer, which makes Celtic's Champions League record look good. Their site lists 54 active players, 10 injured players and a 16-strong practice squad – 80 players. They are looked after by (and these are just the Chiefs – never mind the Indians) 28 coaches plus 10 ancillary “Football Staff”.
At the top of the house there is Owner Jerry Jones, his three children as “Executives” - five “Football Operations Executives and 18 “Playing Personnel Executives”
[Maybe I shouldn't have published that list – it might give TCD ideas as to how he could further expand his empire.]
Compared to that lot, the SRU is running on a skeleton staff. The Cowboys, for instance, employ 12 Attack Coaches and 10 Defense Coaches (Yes, I used the American spelling there). Although to be fair, the SRU are not making the money the Cowboys are.
THERE ARE some people in this game, from whom a period of silence would be welcomed by all. For instance, perma-silence from Clive Woodward or Laurence Dallaglio might get them accepted outside their Sudentenland home. Since he does occasionally make valid points, perhaps a lowering of the volume would suffice for Austin Healy and maybe Nigel Owens should confine his shafts of wisdom to his Welsh TV programmes.
However, with his recent opinions, Exeter Chiefs' Rob Baxter is starting to maybe say too much. Or, is it, he realises, the higher his media profile, the less his chances of inheriting the poisoned chalice of matching English expectations with the quality of player available to their Head Coach.
Baxter's latest public utterance is his warning to football, to be careful with their installation of a sin bin into the elite game – pure bollocks in my view. What “the Beautiful Game” needs is a period of “zero tolernce officiating” to rid it of jersey-tugging, cynical body-checking and fouling, stealing yards at every set piece, diving and the other nefarious activities which make it so-ugly at the top end; and then sees their crimes against football spreading down to the grass roots. Mind you, I have long felt Rugby Union needs the same crack down if it is to rediscover its soul.
Or am I just a disillusioned old romantic?



