REGULAR readers will be aware by now, I am a fervent advocate of the FOSROC SUPER6 as being a crucial part of any future Scottish Rugby might have, should we ever get back to something approaching the pre-2020 normal.
I am also a defender of the franchise system involved in S6. After all, one of the reasons behind its formation was to see S6 being a component in producing more Scottish players, available to our two full-time professional teams.
As I see it, by taking-up an S6 franchise, our clubs are helping out the SRU, so, are entitled to SRU support. BUT, and it is a shame there has to be a but, I think there ought to be an upper age limit for “Scottish-qualified” players being brought in by the S6 clubs.
Nothing against recruiting SQ players from England or overseas, however, we should never forget, in most-cases these guys are coming to Scotland, at least partly because, they are not going to make it in their birth nations.
This week, to a fanfare, Watsonians introduced their latest signings: Gregor Christie from Currie, and James Dalgleish, from University of Queensland.
Nae harm to Christie, who is already a Scotland Club XV “cap” but, I think in signing him, Watsonians and their backers at BT Murrayfield have taken what I call: “The Kilmarnock Option;” this is a reference to the habit of Kilmarnock, some years back, signing the not-so-good brother of a top player. Younger brother Finlay Christie – now signing him would be a real bonus, for Scotland.
Let's look at a pecking order of Scottish scrum-halves:
Ali Price (aged 27)
George Horne (aged 25)
Henry Pyrgos (aged 31)
Sam Hidalgo-Clyne (27)
Charlie Shiel (aged 22)
Jamie Dobie (aged 19)
Sean Kennedy (aged 29)
Scott Steele (aged 27)
Ben Vellacott (aged 25)
Dan Nutton (aged 23)
So, at the very least, Christie is the 11th-best Scotland-qualified scrum-half, and some of the scrum-halves who played in S6 last season will surely argue about that ranking.
Nothing against Christie, but, given five of the players ranked above him in my hypothetical rankings list are younger – is recruiting a 26-year-old really the best use of Watsonians' franchise money?
I could make the same argument about Dalgleish; there are younger Scottish-qualified players ahead of him in the rankings. OK, the two new recruits might give Watsonians an edge in the battle for the S6 title, but, given the development part of the franchises' remit, where does he fit in?
For me, I feel the SRU ought to put-in an upper age limit of say 23, for players being recruited by S6 franchises. I accept, that upper age limit might be increased, specifically for front five forwards, who take longer to mature.
RICHARD COCKERILL wants to see the PRO14 introduce a salary cap. On the face of it, not many will complain – but, I am one. In any professional sport, once you start erecting artificial barriers to the financial free-for-all, you immediately start some of your member clubs off searching for ways round that artificial barrier – EBTs anyone?
I have no qualms about rugby being what it is – an Open sport. I.E. any player is worthy of his wage, it is up to the club employing him to be able to pay that wage, without endangering its long-term viability. By the same token, the very-few genuine World-Class Superstars must be capable of attracting a salary which aligns with their ability to entertain the public and make a difference on the field.
At the end of the day, the majority of the PRO14 teams – the four Welsh and Irish and the two Scottish teams – 10 of the 14 – are to a greater or lesser degree centrally-owned by the governing body in that country.
The notion of the governing body imposing a salary cap on itself is ludicrous. If cost-cutting has to be imposed, then these cuts have to come from elsewhere.
What I would like to see the SRU do, and I am certain, if they did it, the Irish and Welsh would not be too-far behind in doing the same, is cap the squad sizes.
Do Edinburgh and Glasgow really need 50-man pools? I think not. What I would like to see is:
A 40-man centrally-contracted International squad – those players, split equally between the two PRO14 teams.
Below that – a 30-man Development squad of mainly Under-23 players, split equally between the six S6 sides.
These players would be on SRU retainer salaries.
Paying the remainder of the S6 players would be the responsibility of the franchises, via their own fund-raising and salary management.
I would also consider cutting the S6 playing squads to 30 players per club, but allow up to 10 more players to be dual-registered with a club or clubs.
OK, that's a broad brush approach, a bit of fine-tuning will be called for.
|At the same time, I repeat my regular refrain on here. We have too-many “National Leagues” and “National League clubs.”
Ideally, I would like to see us with perhaps ten franchised S10 clubs, with my suggestions above modified to cover this.
Below that, I would see club rugby being regionalised, however, I see nothing wrong with an Inter-District Championship at this level, as a means of allowing the semi-professional and full-time professional teams to have an idea of what talent is coming through.
Post-Covid, going back to where we were would be a retrograde step, going back to the good old days, as some btl commenters on this and other websites seem to want, that would in my view be even worse.
DO THEY still sell green ink in stationery shops in the Home Counties? I ask because, after the announcement of the short list for European Rugby Player of the Year yesterday, I can see a spate of letters, in green ink, to the Letters Page of the Telegraph and Times on the subject.
Elsewhere, I fear for the health of dear Robert Kitson of The Guardian.
I mean look at the list: two “Sweaties” - Stuart Hogg and Finn Russell, one Fijian – Semi Radradra, one New Zealand-born Frenchman – Virimi Vakatawa and only one staunch English yeoman, Sam Simmonds. No Owen Farrell, no Saracens players even – Kitson will be beside himself with grief.
