I HAVE SEEN it suggested these days that the world of sport in this country is now operating in a series of “silos”; each individual sport seemingly going along in its own wee bubble: the football people know only football, elsewhere it's cricket 24/7/52, or 365 days a year Rugby Union.
Some have suggested this is, in part, down to the way in which top sport has retreated from the “free” “Cooncil Telly” to pay-to-view. Back in the day, sport benefitted from the way it was readily-available on th BBC and ITV. It is claimed that when Sky won the rights to Test Cricket, that game as a whole contracted, because the ordinary kids never got to see the stars of the day playing it.
Football is still the main game in the UK, even though the main terrestial channels are now the second line of broadcasting. It is widely believed in the body of the Rugby Union kirk, that the game's retreat – The Six Nations apart, behind the Amazon Prime, Premier Sport, Sky and TNT Sport paywalls – has edversely-affected interest in the game.
Back in th sepia-tinted days when I was a boy, we played fitba nearly all the time; however, in the summer our field of fitba dreams did become for a time, out own Lords, after we watched Dennis Compton, Len Hutton, Keith Miller and Ray Lindwall battle for the Ashes.
Then, every July, we would mark-out a tennis court and become Ken Rosewall or Lew Hoad in the week after Wimbledon. Then we would have a week of pretending to be golfers, before the start of the League Cup dragged us back to being footballers again.
We maybe weren't much good, but we tried sports other than the main one, and I feel we were bettr for it. “Jumpers for goalposts” is maybe a cliché, but we loved it. It seems to me, today's youngsters have to have all the branded equipment and be part of an official club, or they will not play a game – they can only play it if coached and guided, they don't have our doing it for ourselves approach.
That I would venture to suggest, may be one of the reasons for the huge fall-off in numbers of players in youth Rugby Union transitioning to the adult game. In my day, unless you were from the Borders, or went to a private school, you never saw a rugby ball until you entered First Year at your State School.
Thus, the up to six years you spent playing at school were a sort of apprenticeship in the game and you were still keen to learn when the time came to join your local club. At most, we trained two nights per week then played on a Saturday – Rugby Union was still relatively fresh to us at 18.
These days, kids are going into highly-organised club development systems in their earliest years of primary education. Come age 18 and the time to transition into the adult game, I suggest more than a few guys have had enough of playing, or are unwilling to play in a more-physical level of the game, so they drop out and become spectators. Of course, the alternative joys of women and drink might also play a role.
The more-talented players begin to be cherry-picked out of the general system in mid-teens, they have a future at whatever level their talent and drive takes them to, it's the lesser talents who opt-out and no less an authority than Scotland and Lions Legend Iain Milne, proving yet again that tight-head props are the true intellectuals of the game, has been on-point in insisting: “We need more average or poor players” - because these are the guys who grease the wheels of every club, buying the beer, doing the menial jobs which keep the whole show on the road, allowing those who can still play to do their thing.
It strikes me, a whole couple of generations of failed Scottish footballers, guys who, in that time-honoured Scottish saying: “Couldnae kick doors at Halloween” can, once or twice a week, pretend they are 21st century reincarnations of Jim Baxter, Jinky Johnstone, Denis Law or Kenny Dalglish on their local five-a-side pitches.
Just about the most-enjoyable job I had when I was full-time on the tools was piloting the Sports Desk on the Paisley Daily Express. I devoted one full page a week to the ongoings at the local Pitz Football Complex, where they had leagues going seven days per week, and featured such teams as Unreal Madrid, Outer Milan, Inter Yermaw and, quite my favourite: Norfolk En Chance.
These teams and the guys who played for them were never going to qualify for The Champions League, or even the Junior Central League, but, they could live out their fantasies while working-up a thirst and a bit of a sweat.
Why cannot we have the same purely social tier of Rugby Union in Scotland. I can immediately think of at least four Scottish clubs who have the basic infrastructure in place to get a Rugby Union version of these football centres. For sure, we might have to tweak the Laws of Sevens, or develop a hybrid game to suit, but, surely the brains are in-place to beat the obsgtacles.
We might even see an expansion of Walking Rugby and, given the social aspects of “Apres Rugger” the clubs which could come up with something could be well set-up for the future – also, it might keep the players we are losing involved in the game for longer.
In this 21st century, we cannos simply say: “It's aye been and aye will be” that approach hasn't served us that well.
THE BEST bit of social media trolling I have seen in a while was produced this week by an English friend of mine, on a Rugby Union site on Facebook; when he suggested the demise of the South African sides in the Investec Challenge Cup over the weekend was: “A case of cutting-out the dead wood.” As you can imagine, the response from south of the Limpopo has been nuclear.
