TCD
GAVE a press briefing last week,
which has got some of the usual suspects rearing-up. I of course,
being permanently on the naughty step at BT Murrayfield, was not
invited to participate in the briefing, so, my views are coming
second-hand.
The
Usual Suspects want the bulk of the CVC
money from that
company buying into the PRO14
and the
Guinness Six Nations handed
over to the grass roots side of Scottish Rugby.
Get
a life guys – this isn't going to happen.
As
I have written before, the SRU's management model is very clear:
They
run the national team.
That
team generates the income which funds rugby in Scotland.
This
is (in theory) done by playing the type of entertaining,
free-flowing rugby which fills BT Murrayfield and in-part,
encourages the TV companies to wish to invest in the Six Nations.
The
national team is under-pinned by the two full-time sides which play
in the PRO14.
There
is a responsibility on these teams to play the same type of
entertaining, free-flowing rugby as the national side – to prepare
players for playing internationals.
They
also have a duty to make people want to turn up at BT Murrayfield
and Scotstoun to watch them.
Below
there, there is the FORSOC Super 6 competition, which is a bridge
between the general club game and the full-time game. It is mainly a
development league.
Below
that is the club game. This is where the future players are captured
and nurtured.
I
repeat, for the SRU to do as the Usual Suspects wish, and give
the bulk of the new money from CVC to the fourth tier of their
management model – is simply not going to happen.
The
SRU is a two-tier organisation. The Scottish Rugby Union
is, a co-operative of individual clubs, however, the trading
activities of the SRU are undertaken by the Union's
wholly-owned trading arm: Scottish Rugby Union Ltd. The
elected and in particular the paid officials of the Union, therefore,
have to safeguard the trading arm, since it is via this trading arm
that the activities which generate the money which underpins the
financial security of the game are managed.
So
– nae chance of the clubs getting a massive hand-out; more so,
because of the particular problems of Covid. Protecting the finances
of Scottish Rugby Union Limited must be the priority.
However,
this fact does not mean the Board, who run the trading arm, can have
carte blanche to do as they like. The grass roots must be protected,
but, not to the detriment of the trading arm.
By
the same token, the activities of the trading arm, inasmuch as the
finances of the S6 clubs and the two PRO14 clubs, has to be
rigorously monitored – they cannot be allowed to spend, spend,
spend as they wish. The Union's stakeholders, the clubs, have to have
oversight of how the Union's cash is spent.
This
means the SRU Council members have to be more vigilant and
assertive than they have been of late.
For
many of the Usual Suspects who make BTL (below the line) comments on
here; all would be well with Scottish Rugby, if we reverted to the
old amateur days' model of club rugby, feeding into the District
teams and from there into the Scotland teams. Dream on boys –
aint gonna happen.
It
would probably be better if, like the Irish and Welsh, we had four
rather than two Scottish teams in the PRO14. But, I doubt if there is
enough cash lying about in Scotland to fund the other two teams. I
am, however, equally certain, anyone trying to start-up even one
additional full-time team to play in the PRO14 would find the control
freaks of The Junta putting insurmountable obstacles in their way.
I
still reckon we could have a third PRO14 team, more-son if, as
Connacht was at first, it was a development team. With three
full-time teams, we could have tie-ins for each one to two of the S6
clubs, who could – in their turn – have tie-ins with two clubs in
a 12-team Premiership.
Below
that, we could have the grass-roots, purely amateur clubs, playing in
Regional Leagues.
This
would leave us with:
Level
One – Scotland
Level
Two – Edinburgh – Glasgow – Team 3
Level
Three – Ayrshire Bulls – Boroughmuir Bears – Heriot's –
Southern Knights – Stirling County – Watsonians
Level
Four – Aberdeen GSFP – Biggar – Cartha-Queen's Park – Currie
Chieftains – Dumfries Saints - Dundee HSFP – Edinburgh
Academical - Gala – GHA – Glasgow Hawks – Gordonians -
Hamilton Bulls - Hawick – Highland - Jed-forest – Kelso –
Kirkcaldy - Marr – Musselburgh – Newton Stewart - Peebles –
Preston Lodge - Selkirk – Stewart's-Melville.
Before
the squealing: “How come he's put them in and not us,”
etc.,
starts; I merely went down the list of league clubs from season
2019-2020. If we do go down the road of having “Performance
Clubs,”
playing in the National League and above, and “Community
Clubs,” playing
at an all-amateur regional level, then entry to the Performance level
would be subject to each club meeting certain criteria as regards
facilities at their grounds, grandstands, floodlights, pitch quality,
number of coaches, and so-forth. Some on the Level Four list might
not qualify, while clubs not on that list could.
Ideally,
I would want to see those Scottish-based players who were in the full
Scotland squad given central contracts and divided equally between
the three full-time teams. They would, however, only play for them in
certain matches.
The
matches involving the three full-time teams, would be tiered:
Since
there is no relegation in the PRO14, the bulk of the full-time squads
should therefore be Scottish-qualified
players. I do not think
we can afford to compete for the superstar, X-factor
Southern Hemisphere
players, but, should instead only import SH players who are already
Scottish-qualified.
I
would encourage upward and downward movement between the three
full-time clubs and the S6 clubs – to give all the players a chance
of as much game time as possible.
Similarly,
I would enable and encourage upward and downward movement between the
S6 clubs and the Level Four clubs.
I
feel there is a definite case for enlarging S6 to at least an
eight-club tier.
I
feel the SRU should also be looking at the case for resurrecting an
an A-Team Six Nations
competition. I also think
there is a case for entering the Scotland
Club XV, selection for
which is limited to S6 and Level Four players, into the European
Nations Cup.
The
aim would be to, in time, gain promotion to the Trophy
tier, the second level of
the competition – currently contested by: Germany,
Lithuania, Poland, Switzerland and
Ukraine.
Further
down, at Regional level in Scotland, I feel there is a case for
reintroducing Inter-Regional
games, similar to the old
Inter-District games,
as a means of encouraging and recruiting to a higher level, those
players who were late developers or missed out on a chance of
breaking into Performance Rugby, when teenagers.
The
regional leagues should be more-localised, with a return of the old
County
and Regional Cups
to maintain interest. And, while we are at it, lets put Seven-a-side
rugby on a more-organised
and encouraged level than it has ever had.
There
is also, I believe, a case, as happens in Ireland, for less
centralised control of the community game, let each Region have more
autonomy than it currently enjoys, bring control closer to the grass
roots, get more people willing to be involved. It would make for a
healthier game.
And,
fund it properly. Of course, the Performance game would still need to
be funded properly, but, with good house-keeping and firm oversight,
we could make the money go further.
And,
by making changes, we could break-up some of the mini-empires within
BT Murrayfield, which are holding back Scottish Rugby.
I
know the Governance Review Group has been quietly working away
during the Covid pandemic, we need to see what they have to say –
then we need a wide-spread debate, as to how we move forward.
Covid
has offered the chance of reflection, let's not waste that chance.