APPARENTLY,
after the World Cup, the details
of both the CVC deals with the Six Nations and the PRO14 will be
announced.
The
devil will, of course, be in the detail, but, let's assume The
Times, who have
apparently broken the story is correct, and rugby gains £300 million
for selling a share in the Six Nations, and the five Unions, from
Ireland, Italy, Wales, Scotland and South Africa get £115
million for selling a
share in the PRO14, that immediately means a windfall of £73
million to the SRU.
As
I have said, the devil will be in the detail, and CVC will
want to get back their investment, plus a healthy return, during how
ever long they are involved. Going by their involvement in Formula
One, they will not be in rugby for the long run, maybe five to
ten years.
In
that time, we can expect to pay more for TV coverage, so bye-bye the
Six Nations free-to-air on BBC or ITV. The Unions will,
I fear, be under pressure to maximise their income, without upsetting
their core rugby audience too much – a difficult circle to square.
We
have to wonder too, how the SRU will spend the immediate
windfall? Hopefully a lot of the money will filter down to the grass
roots, rather than being squandered in improving the lifestyle of The
Junta.
There
is definitely, I sense, going to be pressure on the elected
officials, Council members and Board members, to ensure
their constituent clubs get their fair share of this new and welcome
money.
The
current interesting times are set to become even-more interesting.
Good times for those of us in the media seeking to keep the game's
rulers in check, by asking the awkward questions.
I
WAS seated
beside a returning Troon Exile at the Marr pre-match lunch on
Saturday. This gentleman has these past many years been engaged in
vital missionary work in the Sudentenland, trying and failing to save
our English neighbours from their own baser instincts.
During
these long years of trying to plant the seeds of the superior
Scottish way among our heathen neighbours, he has, both as a player
and a spectator, got his Saturday rugby kicks at Richmond
Athletic Ground, watching
his beloved London
Scottish.
I
have other exiled friends and acquaintances to whom RAG
on a Saturday is a
little touch of Scotland in South West London, so, I was not
surprised when my Marr friend opined that BT
Murrayfield ought to
be getting a lot closer to Scottish than they currently are.
Indeed,
my lunch companion revealed, he would not be amiss to seeing the
three Exiles clubs
in the imperial capital: London
Irish, London Scottish and
London Welsh cutting
their top team ties with the RFU
and switching to the
PRO14.
Not
least of the reasons for this switch would surely be, that Guinness,
the corporate
sponsors of the league would surely be delighted to have the three
clubs playing in their league, in the city where they have a massive
corporate presence.
My
confidante, who has the benefit of living and working in the
Sudentenland, is convinced, if the switch of the three clubs to the
PRO14
was handled properly, every Paddy,
Jock and Dai
within reasonable
travelling distance of London would give his particular exiles club
his support.
I
accept, given they are one of the 13 clubs which own English
Premiership Rugby, London Irish might
not be keen to switch to the rival league. However, since the RFU's
70% English-qualifed players in a match-day squad rule
rather negates the USP of the Exiles clubs, why not?
The
relationship between RAG
and BTM
has been a fraught
one in the professional era. Am I alone in believing, getting a deal
with Scottish is probably the cheapest option when it comes to the
long-needed third professional team?
Use
Scottish
as the development team. The club is adamant, it is happy to play in
the second tier in England, and does not wish to be promoted. Get the
best young players – with a leavening of experience, playing there,
then, in time, switch to an expanded PRO14.
That makes sense to
me, and a lot of other people – why not to The
Junta?
QTV,
the
Glasgow-based company which has been handed the contract to cover
Super-6 when
it starts, are working-up towards this by taking over the actual
filming of Scottish
Rugby TV's coverage
of the Tennent's
Premiership and
National League
One.
I
watched week one, and thought it was honking. Week two is no better,
in fact, it may be worse. They will need to improve greatly, and
quickly, if they are to make a success of covering S6.
For
a start, the lack of a commentary is a major omission. In fact, it's
a distinct no-no. Multiply that failing by not providing a voice-over
to the results round-up, or even some quotes from the coaches or main
players in the featured games and you would be as well not bothering.
The
camera position at Currie, the featured Premiership match was, to my
mind, too low.
No,
a poor couple of shows, QTV
must do better – a lot better, and quickly. Scottish Rugby deserves
much better than this crap production.

The Broadcasting Act 1996 (as amended) gives the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport the power to draw up a list of sporting events of national interest. This ensures that the broadcast rights to these events must be offered to the main free-to-air terrestrial broadcasters on “fair and reasonable terms”. The aim is to make sure that the events are made available to all television viewers.
ReplyDeleteThe current list was compiled in June 1998 and consists of two groups.
For Group A events, full live coverage must be offered. This group includes the FA Cup Final, the Grand National and the Olympic Games.
Group B events may have live coverage on subscription television provided that secondary coverage is offered to the free-to-air broadcasters. This group includes the Six Nations rugby union tournament, the Ryder Cup, and cricket test matches played in England.
Well stated TSC
ReplyDeleteImagine the scenario. 6N we need to ensure there is free to air coverage of our game otherwise we will have an English Cricket situation. CVC - which part of the £300M we gave you makes you think you have a choice in these matters?
I expect to see healthy wage increases for the Executive team after all their efforts in landing this bonanza. It’s really tough work sitting in a Committee when approached by venture capital with big pockets. Let me tell you. All those dinners and meetings. Exhausting!
The players will be next up. Short careers and ever increasing playing schedules. At least the earn the cash so good luck to them.
Next up will be suitably enhanced morsels to the club game. No doubt the S6 clubs will be rewarded for their gamble with 4G pitches. Some more money chucked into club facilities etc
Which completely ignores the elephant in the room. How does all this get more players playing? Help with the increasing postponements and the shocking one sided matches?
A £73m windfall - is this to be paid as a one off, or over a number of years?
ReplyDeleteWill each Union receive equal payments?
Will payments be performance based?
How quickly will they introduce promotion & relegation, perhaps with core nations + others?
Windfall - forget it!
DeleteThe DSC believes the CVC deal will be around a short-term loan repayable @ 15% per annum interest.
I read somewhere that the CVC money is effectively a loan for which the 6 nations countries have to pay an interest rate of 15 % per annum. The way in which the "interest" is to be paid is still being worked through. If true, not quite the windfall it sounds!
ReplyDelete