THERE is an interesting piece on the Currie RFC web page at the moment, which I feel ought to be required reading for all officials of the top clubs in Scotland. The writer makes the point about the hit-and-miss nature of the fixture list since the end of RBS Premier 1 rugby in November and prior to next week's resumption of hostilities in Premier A and B.
The writer concludes that, with next season's format change to just two, ten-club Premier Leagues, things are unlikely to get better in the short term, indeed, the writer fears increased fixture chaos in years to come.
As someone who covers both football codes, might I suggest that senior rugby in Scotland is, today, in a similar position to where senior football was here when the Scottish League was formed in 1890.
Prior to that date, football teams were "clubs" - organised and run by committees, often the club officials and the players were the same people; there was a dependance on volunteers and while some playes were paid, they were in the minority.
In the Edwardian period these "clubs" by and large became businesses - and I appreciate here this timescale is a bit elastic - at the top level there was virtually no place for the amateur, regardless of his talent and we were at the head of the slippery slope leading to the depths wherein Scottish football is to be found today.
By holding back the process of professionalisation for a century longer than football managed, generations of rulers of rugby might be excused, as they look down on today's game from the great dirty bar in the sky, for wondering if it was worth it.
Aside from the fact that the men holding the purse strings are largely English, is there much difference between the English football and rugby Premierships? Both bodies are paying silly money for over-hyped players, the top clubs are in-thrall to benefactors who could withdraw their financial safety nets at a moment's notice and who are more concerned about their own wee kingdom than the overall state of the game in their country.
It's not as bad up here, or in Ireland and Wales, where the national governing bodies control the purse strings, but, our set-up is far from ideal.
On the one hand, Edinburgh and Glasgow, like Celtic and Rangers in football, are geared-up to competing in Europe, but, for the long-term, greater good of Scottish Rugby, we probably need at least one more, if not two more full-time professional sides playing in an expanded Pro12 and providing a home for our top players.
I doubt, however, if Scotland could support four full-time pro sides and, given what happened when it was tried in Edinburgh, long, careful and detailed consultations between entrepreneur and SRU would be needed before a home-based Brian Kennedy or a rugby loving David Murray put real money into another Scottish pro side.
The link between the two pro sides and the top clubs is improving, but we've got a long way to go to get it right.
But, to return to the top club sides - the likely lads who will be in Premier 1 and 2 next season. Might I suggest they need to up their game. These clubs are now more-reliant on sponsorship, gate money and the like than ever before. Their first XV players no longer have to pay a match fee (even if that's only to buy the beer). They get strips, boots, kit hold-alls, track suits and so forth provided - in my day, we bought our own. The expenses are much better, as is the physiotherapy care.
But, all this has to be paid for, which means better spectator facilities, better media relations, working harder and smarter.
Perhaps the time is nigh for the SRU, in consultation with the Premier Clubs, to set-down minimum standards for Premier clubs' grounds and other facilities. Given there doesn't seem to be a great interest in summer rugby, shouldn't the top teams, as happens with football's SPL, be required, as a condition of membership of the Premiership, to have pitch protection in place.
For instance, I spend a lot of my season covering Ayr. They are now the premier sports club in that town, but, while the Millbrae stand is newer and doesn't lead much (other than the annoying drip onto where I used to park my lap top case), it isn't as well-appointed a stand as the one at Somerset Park (which, if you believe the Glasgow media should have a preservation order on its ramshackleness). The standing facilities at Millbrae are worse than at Somerset Park, which is known as "The Piggery" by those upper class smarties who follow Kilmarnock.
Ayr are a top club, running it costs a pretty penny, but perhaps, were some of the funds to be diverted into a Millbrae upgrade, the club could, in the long run, make even more money and be even stronger.
That said, I know Billy McHarg, Jock Craig & Co are looking at perhaps moving to a new, purpose-built ground, as the cheaper and better option.