OVER
the last four posts, I have given careful and detailed consideration
to the Super Six franchise document. During this time, I have had a
fair bit of feed-back, from members of the broader Scottish rugby
community, and the most-common thing I have heard is: “OK
smart-arse, you've had a go at Murrayfield – so, what would you
do?”
If I was in Mark Dodson's shoes, I'd do this
Well,
for a start, I would not do what the SRU is proposing and start six
new franchises. If they want to see more players ready to play at
PRO14 level and beyond – then the cost of this should come out of
SRU central funds. As the SRU's plans currently stand, as per the
consultative franchise document: there would only be limited
financial input from Murrayfield. It seems to me, the top clubs –
or at least six of them - are being asked to take a huge financial
risk, with no guarantee of a return.
By
all means offer a pathway whereby our new Academy graduates can be
better-prepared for the tougher tasks. Well, start a third
professional side, even if this team, as Connacht was originally
envisaged, is a “Development” side, charged with getting younger
professionals prepared for joining Edinburgh and Glasgow.
But,
if the SRU must go down the road of a Super Six, and, as I have said
previously – I do not see how it could work properly, then these
six franchised clubs MUST become true DISTRICT teams, filling the
function of the District sides of the amateur era. It will be up to
these clubs, and the SRU, to make them centres of excellence – and
to persuade the lesser clubs in the Districts to co-operate with them
in a two-way flow of players and interest.
I
would leave the BT Premiership as it is. This is a good competition,
the teams play a high- quality brand of competitive, entertaining
rugby; all it needs is to be “sold” better; so the mainstream
media, which by and large ignores it, realised and bought into what a
good competition it is.
But,
I have to accept, not every Premiership player has the potential to
be a full-time professional. Yes, it is good to see the Stage Two and
Three Academy players, and the fringe full-time professionals playing
in it, but, we need some sort of competition, as a staging point
between the very top of the club game and the professional one –
the gap Super Six is supposedly going to fill. OK, fill it, with the
return of an old favourite. Bring back the Inter-District
Championship, but, increase the number of “District” sides.
When
the Inter-District Championship was going, back in the amateur days,
there were five teams involved: the Anglo-Scots, Edinburgh,Glasgow,
North and Midlands and the South. In the revived edition I am
suggesting, it could be possible to have an eight-team competition,
involving: Edinburgh, Exiles, Glasgow, London Scottish, the Midlands,
the North, the South and the South West. If they play each other home
and away, that's a 14-game season, more than enough additional games
on top of the 18-game BT Premiership campaign.
A filtering process
Such
a competition would be an ideal means of filtering out the squad for
the Club International XV, and the Under-20 squad, given a lot of the
players involved would be Academy students.
The
Exiles would be drawn from outwith Scotland, but, excluding London
Scottish, while the South-West is a team drawn from the lower
geographic end of the Glasgow District – basically Ayrshire and
Renfrewshire and Dumfries and Galloway. The other District boundaries
are already known and obvious.
Such
a competition would I think test the best of the Premiership players,
plus the more-promising players from the level below. I think it
would work.
I
would do away with two of the three current National Leagues, below
the Premiership. I can see a case for having more than a mere ten
sides playing nationally, but believe rugby should be, as outlined in
Agenda 3 and in the Super Six consultative documents, totally
amateur. I would therefore have District Leagues, and, here again, I
would split the Glasgow and North and Midlands Districts. The South
West would be hived-off from Glasgow, the North and Midlands would
revert to being separate Districts.
And,
what I would also do, is have two separate divisions within the SRU.
The Murrayfield professionals would, as they currently do, run the
High Performance arm of Scottish rugby – the national team, the age
group teams and the three full-time professional sides. Below that, I
can see some merit in having joint managerial overview with technical
input from the High Performance arm, in the Premiership, provided
the clubs had the final say,
while the amateur game should, as happens in football, be
administered by a separate organisation.
The Clubs Must Have Their Say
Football has the
grass-roots game managed by in particular the Scottish Junior FA, I
would like to see a Scottish Junior Rugby Union doing a similar job
in our game. The SJFA is run by a skeleton staff inside Hampden Park,
National Secretary Tom Johnson, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer Ian
McQueen and a small office staff. The bulk of the organisation is
done by the volunteer officials of the three Regional Associations –
the West, East and North of Scotland Junior FAs. These volunteers
come from the clubs – the clubs are in-charge.
They organise and run
the leagues and cups – apart from the National Scottish Junior Cup
– they allocate the referees, look after most of the finances, run
the disciplinary procedures and so on. It works in football, it could
also work in rugby.
How It Might Look
Premiership:
Ayr, Boroughmuir, Currie Chieftains, Glasgow Hawks, Hawick, Heriot's,
Marr, Melrose, Stirling County, Watsonians.
National League:
Aberdeen GSFP, Cartha-Queen's Park, Dundee HSFP, Edinburgh
Academical, Falkirk, Gala, GHA, Jed-forest, Kelso, Musselburgh,
Selkirk, Stewart's-Melville FP.
The clubs in these two
divisions would be allowed to pay their players – there should be a
presumption of semi-professionalism abroad in the Premiership, and, a
movement towards the infrastructure expected of the proposed Super
Six.
Clubs at this level
should have 4G pitches and good spectator facilities. They should, as
now, have access to the fringe professionals and Academy students.
Taking current league
memberships and positions into consideration, the truly-amateur local
leagues might, initially, look like this:
Edinburgh District
Division One: Broughton FP, Corstorphine Cougars, Dunbar,
Forrester, Haddington, Lasswade, Linlithgow, Livingston, Murrayfield
Wanderers, Portobello, Preston Lodge, Ross High.
Edinburgh District
Division Two: Barnton, Dalkeith, Edinburgh Northern, Edinburgh
University Medics, Inverleith, Leith, Liberton, Lismore, Penicuick,
RDVC, Trinity Academicals.
Glasgow District
Division One: Allan Glen's, Cambuslang, Dalziel, East Kilbride,
GHK, Glasgow Academicals, Greenock Wanderers, Hamilton,
Hillhead-Jordanhill, Oban Lorne, West of Scotland, Whitecraigs.
Glasgow District
Division Two: Birkmyre, Clydebank, Cumbernauld, Glasgow
University Medics, Helensburgh, Lenzie, Loch Lomond, Paisley,
Strathaven, Strathendrick, Uddingston, Waysiders-Drumpellier.
Glasgow District
Division Three: Bishopton, Cowal, Hyndland, Isle of Mull, Lanark,
Lochaber,Police Scotland Glasgow, Shawlands FP.
Midlands District
Division One: Alloa, Blairgowrie, Carnoustie HSFP, Dunfermline,
Glenrothes, Grangemouth Stags, Hillfoots, Howe of Fife, Kinross,
Kirkcaldy, Madras, Panmure.
Midlands District
Division Two: Aberfeldy, Angus Development, Arbroath,
Bannockburn, Bo'ness, Crieff and Strathearn, Dundee University
Medics, Morgan, Rosyth, Stobswell, Waid Academy FP.
North District
Division One: Aberdeenshire, Aberdeen Wanderers, Banff,
Caithness, Ellon, Garioch, Gordonians, Highland, Mackie Academy FP,
Moray, Orkney, Perthshire.
North District
Division Two: Aberdeen University Medics, Deeside, RAF
Lossiemouth, Ross Sutherland, Shetland, Stornoway, Strathmore.
South District
League: Berwick, Biggar, Duns, Earlston, Gala YM, Hawick
Harlequins, Hawick Linden, Langholm, Moffat, Peebles, St Boswell's.
South-West District
League: Annan. Ardrossan Academicals, Carrick, Cumnock, Dumfries
Saints, Garnock, Irvine, Kilmarnock, Millbrae, Newton Stewart,
Stewartry, Wigtownshire.

No comments:
Post a Comment