IN
yesterday's first part of my look at Super 6, I concentrated on the
general outline of the franchise document which the SRU issued on
Monday. But, as we know, the devil is in the detail, and, in the
Union's 36-page document, there is a lot of detail to go through.
SRU Technical Director Stevie Gemmell - a key man in the franchise move
This
being Scotland, one of the first question many would-be franchisees
will ask is: “How much will this cost us?” And there's the rub.
The running costs are roughly known – each season the franchise
clubs will have to pay 35 players, up to a maximum of £12,000; not
every player will be on that – but, the SRU appears to have set
that as the salary of a Club XV internationalist, or maybe a player
stepping down from a full-time contract with one of the two
professional sides. Academy players or guys who have come through the
club's own amateur development system will probably not be on as big
a salary.
Add
insurance costs, National Insurance etc, and the costs add-up. But,
hidden away in section seven of the document – on page 22, is the
real kicker:
“7.2
the ground.
Having
the use of an all-weather (World Rugby compliant) pitch (or the
prospects of so having) together with modern flood lighting on both
playing and training pitches will influence the award of franchises.
Super
6 franchise grounds will take priority for the financial support
aimed at developing club facilities financed by or through Scottish
Rugby. Scottish Rugby intends that all Super 6 fixtures should be
played on all-weather pitches by the end of the initial franchise
period.
Grounds
must provide easy access for spectators, and provide adequate car
parking, safe standing and sitting for an appropriate number, have a
minimum standard of refreshment available and an effective system of
public address.
7.3
training facilities
The
part-time professional game requires franchised clubs to have a high
standard of training facilities for the squad of 35.
Inside
accommodation must include a gymnasium that is suitably equipped for
strength and conditioning training, changing and shower rooms, and
suites for medical and physiotherapy treatment.
Outdoor
training pitches must be proof against normal adverse weather
conditions and have enough space to allow coaches to organise the
simultaneous practice of skill and training regimes by different
groups within a squad.
7.4
Infrastructure
The
facilities must have indoor accommodation with enough capacity for
briefings and catering for the whole of the squad and its support
staff.
There
must be an IT and WiFi infrastructure that supports filming and match
analysis, and also capabilities for broadcasting, and systems for
player monitoring and electronic record keeping.
7.5
Support staff
Franchise
agreements will require Super 6 squads to have the same types of
coaching and related support as the full-time professional clubs.
Super
6 squads may share the services of some specialist practitioners on
the staff of the professional club with which they are linked. Other
support personnel may be on the full or part-time payroll of the
franchised club itself.
All
these people will be under the direction of the head coach who will
appoint them in consultation with the Technical Director of Scottish
Rugby and the franchise board.
The
coaching and support team will have these core personnel, some of
whom may be part-time:
•
two or three
assistant coaches with specialist skills
•
a strength and
conditioning practitioner
•
a chartered
physiotherapist
•
a match analyst
•
the services of a
dietician/nutritionist.”
There
must also be a suitably qualified Medical Practitioner. They will
attend on match days, and also when and where required to monitor,
advise, prescribe and, if appropriate, treat illness and injuries
sustained by players. This will require the doctor and other support
staff to be present during some training sessions in the week.
That
first part – about the ground; that immediately means, any club
which applies for a franchise is committed to, within the initial
five-year period, installing a suitable pitch. Obviously costs vary
on an individual basis, dependant on how much preparatory work is
required, but, a “ball park” figure for installing the sort of 4G
pitch which the SRU expects the six franchises to have is put at
between £300,000 and £500,000.
The
franchise document states (part 7.2, paragraph two) that the Super 6
will have priority for
financial support aimed at developing club facilities throughout
Scotland, at least during the initial five-year period. So, other,
smaller clubs will not find it so easy to get financial help from
Murrayfield in that period.
In
addition to the big cost, of the 4G pitch and any floodlight
upgrading or installation, some potential clubs will find they will
also have to spend big on upgrading their training facilities, and
their spectator facilities.
The
other thing which becomes clear as the nitty-gritty of the document
is studied, is just how much power Stevie Gemmell, the SRU's
newly-appointed Technical Director will have, in the choice of
coaches and support staff – he will need to be consulted at every
stage.
Indeed,
some, who have already scanned the document, are seeing it as yet
another example of the Murrayfield professionals taking a firmer
grip on the game.
Sure,
over the initial five-year period, good, solid club men, who began at
their club as a Mini-Rugby player and come through the age-group
ranks will still get a game, but, going forward, there is a
suggestion that, more and more the Super 6 clubs will be where those
players who have, from aged 15, gone along the SRU's Player Pathway
development programme, but, who have not made the final step onto the
Edinburgh or Glasgow player roster, will find themselves.
Certainly,
the proposals include an element of further education – I applaud
the part which calls on the Super 6 franchise winners to establish
links with a local college or university, but, to me, it seems the
SRU is going down the SFA path: “If you haven't been identified by
16 or 18 son, forget it,you will not make it.”
Well,
rugby is not like that, in some positions – prop being the obvious
one, late developers are the norm rather than the exception.
More
thoughts to follow.

No comments:
Post a Comment