IT
MAY not be received wisdom, but, there is a belief in sports,
particularly team sports, that a pyramid is the best governance
system. One of the best known pyramids in that in English football:
an 11 level pyramid, from the likes of the two Manchester clubs and
Liverpool at the peak, Level 1, right down to nearly 800 clubs
playing at the lowest layer – Level 11; the entire edifice
encompassing some 2000 clubs the length and breadth of England.
If the Great Pharoh Dodson built one of these, we might remember him fondly
In
many ways, Scottish Rugby has a pyramid system – the two full-time
professional clubs, Edinburgh and Glasgow, under-pinned by the ten BT
Premiership clubs (soon to be reduced to the six “Super” clubs);
below them the three National Leagues, and underneath them the
various Regional Leagues in Caledonia, Edinburgh and the West.
Now,
Scottish Rugby's “pyramid” has never been officially graded or
named as such, far-less been organised as a proper pyramid might be,
but, it can be argued it is there. It could also be argued, instead
of tinkering around the upper levels, with Stupid 6 – a top-down
mainly cosmetic exercise, implemented without consultation, and on
the most-spurious of grounds - the SRU might have been better doing a
thorough and complete overhaul, consulting the clubs as to what they
wanted.
However,
the Ayatollahs do not consult, they ken better than the rest of us.
One
of the “benefits” we are told, of Super 6 and its companion
initiative, Agenda 3, will be: “fewer but stronger clubs.” Will
this really be a benefit? Will a slimmed-down Scottish Rugby be any
better? Surely, weakening the base will weaken the whole pyramid.
I
could perhaps get behind Stupid 6, if Murrayfield could come-up with
some sensible justification for implementing it. But, it seems to be
based on at best a whim, at worst a power grab, and will, I fear,
crash and burn and do huge damage to the game up here. But, by the
time this is realised, there is every chance the carpet-baggers
behind it will have shot the craw to pastures new, leaving someone else to
clean-up their mess.
I
could see benefits if, as has happened in football, there was a club
licensing scheme, whereby, if you wanted to play at a certain level,
you had to have certain facilities and systems in place. To some
extent, this will happen with Stupid 6 - and further down with the proposed Gold, Silver and Bronze club gradings. The successful franchises
will require to have a 3G pitch, strength and conditioning facilities
and various other things, but, I feel, in no-way does what the SRU is
demanding, and to be fair, promising to help fund, come close to the
demands made on football teams seeking to rise through the English
football pyramid, or even the Scottish Football one.
I
seldom see games below Premiership rugby level, but, friends who do
go along to say Regional League games tell me, one of the biggest
problems these lower level clubs have is a shortage of players, with,
in some lower leagues, teams being kicked-out, because they are
unable to raise teams to play fixtures. In particular, the demands of
“front row experience” are proving very hard for some clubs to
meet.
The Art of Coarse Rugby Is Due A Revival
There
are suggestions, buried deep in the verbiage of Agenda 3, that some
sort of recreational rugby be allowed. Didn't we call that “Coarse
Rugby” when I was a boy and it was played at second or third XV
level?
I
could live with that, however, for it to work, Murrayfield would need
to slacken the grip it has on the throat of the game. Let me explain,
using Scottish football as an example.
At
one end of Scottish football, we have Celtic and Rangers and the
other Premiership clubs; below them there are three further divisions
of the SPFL, while below them are the Highland and Lowland Leagues.
That strata covers the 42 “Senior League” clubs and the 34
“Non-League Senior” clubs – the 18 Highland and 16 Lowland
League clubs.
These
76 clubs are full members of the SFA and are administered by the
SFA's 'Professional Game Board'. Every other officially -recognised
football team is the responsibility of the 'Non-Professional Game
Board'. This covers the clubs in the East of Scotland and South of
Scotland Leagues, the various Junior Leagues within the SJFA, the
many amateur leagues within the SAFA, and the many other
“recreational” leagues and teams within the Scottish Welfare FA,
plus the Under-21 clubs within membership of the Scottish Youth FA,
and the Scottish Schools FA, not forgetting the Scottish Women's FA –
all these lesser associations being affiliated to the SFA.
Then
there are the Futsal players, the guys playing five-a-side every
week, and the growing numbers of older people playing Walking
football.
(A
wee diversion here – we've got walking football and walking hockey
– why not walking rugby for us coffin dodgers?)
The SJFA's Tom Johnston - the SRU could learn from him and how his grade of football is organised
I
must admit, I am not au fait with how the likes of the SAFA, or the
SWFA or SYFA run things but, I do know, Tom Johnston, the excellent
General Secretary of the SJFA manages to keep the lid on the eternal
clan wars among the 160-plus junior clubs with the assistance of one
secretary and two or three days per week attendance in their Hampden
office of Treasurer Iain McQueen, elder brother of former Scotland
legend Gordon.
The
three Regional Junior FAs, in the East, North and West, run things
week-to-week with volunteer officials, and it works. I assume similar
models work for the other affiliated FAs within the SFA.
Can
anyone tell me what, other than Murrayfield's reluctance to release
their hands from what Dodson has called: “the levers of power” is
stopping the SRU from devolving power to run the lower levels of the
game to somewhere closer to the clubs.
The
SRU is, according to one of the faithful, who has posted a load of
shite on David Barnes's excellent The Offside Line site recently: “A
£50 million per year operation with over 200 staff”. Well, given
that staff includes the 90 or so Edinburgh and Glasgow players plus
their support staff, and the staff in the Academies, I reckon that
leaves somewhere above 150 other staff. What do they all do?
Or
is it a case of the old joke we used to hear down here in the East
Ayrshire coalfield: “Hoo muny work at Lugar Works?” (the local
NCB area headquarters).
“Ah
think, aboot hauf o them.”
Might that story
be relevant to Murrayfield today?


Very much how I see things AMcS.
ReplyDeleteCollaboration, consultation and involvement - no matter how painful - are the essence of robust and sustainable change.
I was listening to a podcast and the person being interviewed said “do you want to be right or do you want to win?”
What they were talking about was having people around you who will critique and question (with positive intent) your plans and actions.
The curious thing is that there are decades of evidence from business on how difficult change is (less than 5% of culture change efforts work) and many examples of what helps and what doesn’t.
So what “secret sauce” does the SRU have that embuies them with superhero powers that they are right and everyone else is wrong?