PERHAPS
THE
argument of this current Premiership season (the ongoing S6 bourach
aside) has been the somewhat daft Professional draft system. Phil
Smith, the Heriot's Head Coach, has largely kept his own counsel on
this – well, he cannot really comment, since he has not had the
benefit of even one released professional in the first 13 rounds of
the competition.
Phil Smith - a happy boy on Saturday night
Not
that this has handicapped the “Nails”, who produced a
thoroughly-”professional” performance of forward power to
dismantle Ayr, in horrendous conditions at Millbrae on Saturday.
Ayr
certainly had two full-time professionals in their ranks on Saturday
– Scotland centre Alex Dunbar, who started, but did not finish the
game, after sustaining a nasty looking shoulder injury, and Paddy
Kelly, who replaced him. But, the damage to the hosts, who went into
the game as league leaders, was done up front.
Much
of what we do this season has to be accompanied by a nod to next
season and Super-6. This new competition is seen as the “bridge”
between the club game and the professional one – an area in which
late developers and guys who were maybe overlooked when deciding on
Academy contracts can flourish.
Each
team on Saturday listed 11 forwards – the starting eights, plus
three subs. Heriot's forward squad included three Club XV
internationalists – Michael Liness, Struan Cessford and Ruaridh
Leishman - and three Under-20 “caps” - Charlie Jupp, Adam
Sinclair and Martin Hughes.
Ayr's
11 forwards included one full cap – Holland's Wolf van Dijk, one
Under-20 cap in Robbie Smith and three Club XV caps in Steven
Longwell, Pete McCallum and Blair Macpherson.
This
is the calibre of player we will increasingly see in the S6 squads
moving forward and on Saturday's evidence, the one who looked
most-ready to bridge that gap between club play and professional
play, if needed, was Cessford, a player who has perhaps been unlucky
inasmuch as he plays in a position in which Scotland is comparatively
richly-endowed at the moment.
Struan Cessford - immense for Heriot's on Saturday
As
Phil Smith commented post-match: “I know it wasn't possible, but, I
could have loaned Struan to Dean Richards on Friday night, to solve
Newcastle's tight-head shortage, and he would have done a job for
them.” None of the press corps scoffed at that notion.
So,
Saturday at Millbrae offered further evidence, should it be required,
that S6 should be given a chance. The six clubs are united in their
determination to make the concept, for all its flaws, work.
We
should not forget, S6 was dreamt-up by Murrayfield, because the clubs
could not agree a way forward among themselves. Yes, probably, a
refined form of District competition would have been fairer or
better. Of course, having three of the six franchises in Edinburgh is
a nonsense. Certainly, there is a risk of a rugby desert being formed
north of the Highland Line.
But,
if the clubs in the northern-most regions of Scotland cannot get
together and work for the common good – preferring to maintain
age-old rivalries, then that is not Murrayfield's fault, or problem.
Aberdeen
will never have a viable cub playing at the highest National League
level for as long as Gordonian shuns Grammarian and neither speaketh
unto Wanderer. It is apparently just as bad in some parts of Tayside,
where we hear of clubs a shortish touch kick apart who flounce about
glaring at each other like the legendary Indian and Pakistani troops
putting on their show of mutual disdain when they close the border
gates each night.
And
we still have the argument about where the “core” clubs of the
six franchise-holders will play. Of course there is a chance of the
six clubs “warehousing” players – except, if say Ayr entice
players from elsewhere in Ayrshire to Millbrae next season, so what –
let me see: John Sharp, Jim Montgomery, Robin McEwan, “Rivet” Rae
and Crawford McGuffie have all gone from Marr to Ayr in my time,
Derek
Stark crossed the Rubicon from Kilmarnock to Millbrae, the big boy
Duncan, a good lock whose first name I forget, arrived at Ayr from
Irvine, Jim Wilson from Dalry was a huge influence when Ayr first
began to be be considered a first-class side, while Mark Bennett,
Paddy Dewhirst and Gavin Lowe are not the only Cumnock products to
have worn pink and black - “Stiffy” McClure was sending his best
Cumnock Academy boys to Ayr, 60 years ago, when they were still a “Junior” side.
And Stafford McDowell was following in his father's footsteps when he
moved from Stewarty to Ayr.
Ambitious and talented players like the Brown borthers, seen here in Barbarians' colours, will always move
There
has always been movement – 40-odd years ago, Ian McLauchlan,
Quintin Dunlop, Al McHarg, Gordon Brown, Peter Brown and Gordon
Strachan were in the same Scotland pack, Alex Wilson and Ian Gray
were B caps, with David Gray soon to join them. All Ayrshiremen, none
of them playing for an Ayrshire club when they were capped. Behind
the pack, Dave Shedden and the Gossmans did likewise.
Ambitious
players will always move, it is a fact of life. Any half-decent
player will want to see how far his talent and application can take
him. Sure, a lesser club might lose an ambitious player or two to a
Super-6 club, or even the Super-6 franchise's “core” club. But,
if he doesn't enjoy the experience, or if he isn't getting the game
time he wants – he will almost certainly return to his first club.
He
may come back with his tail between his legs; he will then certainly
be subject to some “banter”, but, if he is worth his salt at all,
he will bring back some new ideas and probably return a better
player. The movement will not be all one-way.
If
the S6 clubs are sensible, they will forge new, lasting relationships
with the lesser clubs. If the lesser clubs are sensible, they too
could benefit – perhaps taking a slow-developing but talented
Under-18 player from the bigger club and giving him a less-stressful
platform on which to develop his skills.
Look,
S6 is new, it is still a bit of an unknown, but, it need not be the
“Sarajevo incident” which sparks-off full-scale warfare in
Scottish Rugby.



I agree with you that IF S6 is going ahead then we need to get with the programme.
ReplyDeleteHowever it takes two to tango! The S6 sides and the SRU have large dollops of humble pie to eat in how this has come to pass. Not least of which is making the rules up as they go along.
We desperately need clarity from all concerned about how S6 will work and when it will be played.
Will there be movement between S6 and non S6 sides? One of the premises of S6A3 was separation of pro and amateur rugby. Obviously this has been undermined by the AGM motions.
How exactly will the S6 side be a beacon of excellence in the area as promised?
All for them farming out young players to other clubs. Soon as they start talking about that the better.
I would encourage any aspiring player to go play at a higher level. It’s when finance and payments (unsustainable imo) kicks in that life gets interesting. A case in point is Falkirk RFC. I don’t advocate an unpaid club scene as I think that’s shutting the barn door after the horse has bolted. What I do stress is that clubs must adhere to law and be open about their payments. It would be fascinating to see how many who currently pay players are legally compliant.
I wonder what Dodson and co would have done differently if they had a chance of a do over?
Fundamentally we need to separate the issues of the pro/performance side of the game from those of the Club/grassroots side of the game.
ReplyDeleteWhen it comes pro/performance, I'm sure you will struggle to find anyone in Scotland who disagrees with the goal of trying to raise the standard of the current Premiership so that it closes the chasm that exists between it and current Pro14/international standards.
If Murrayfield has decided that it is setting the goals and controlling how that gap is closed, then so be it, but it should finance those ambitions without it draining the funds from the Club/grassroots game, or if it is to drain the current funding, then it should tell the Clubs that is what it is doing.
However, they have chosen not to do that.
They have taken what I would call a politicians route and tried to hide the truth from the Clubs.
By including Super 6 in domestic rugby/Rugby Development, they have chosen the route where they can pretend they are increasing the financing to the Club/grassroots game, whilst at the same time, taking the lions share of that budget for the Super 6 project which is a pro/performance project.
The only way the majority of Member Clubs will find out what is happening with the funding they think is allocated to them is when those franchises which are set up as ltd. companies report to Companies House.
Whilst encouraging folk that it's now time to just get on with it is probably the message the Murrayfield machinery wants to hear, it does not remove any of the problems / concerns about problems the Super6 project may cause the grassroots game, and is to some degree disrespectful of those people who have those concerns.
Very well said pegj
DeleteIf the SRU has been open and honest about all this we might have agreed but they chose to dissemble
Capitulation....?
ReplyDeleteI remember Ayr had just won Cumnock sevens and their Captain, the late Kirk Murdoch, in his winners speech suggested that Cumnock RFC would be a great feeder club to Ayr. It’s not often you hear boos at a winners speech. But I suppose Big Dobbie, Herbie, Al Howat, Big Rammage, Roger Thomson, Big Jacko, Davy Allardyce et al can’t all be wrong!!!
ReplyDelete