THE
Scottish
Football Union (as the SRU was back then) and the Scottish Football
Association were both formed at the zenith of the British Empire.
But, whereas events in England – the surreptitious recruitment of
“The Scotch Professors”, which led to the recognition of
professional footballers within two decades, saw football be quicker
to accept the realities of money's less than benign influence on what
was, up till then basically a recreational pastime; the more
middle-class rugby code held out.
Certainly
the “broken-time” argument which saw the formation of “The
Northern Football League” - now the Rugby League, rocked England,
in Scotland, the middle-class professional types from the Edinburgh
and Glasgow Academies and the “merchant” schools in the capital
and the other cities, were quite happy for the handling code to
remain strictly amateur. And thus it stayed until those pesky
colonials from the southern hemisphere dropped the professional
bombshell into the ruck in 1995.
Dr John Smith - football internationalist and British Lion
But,
for most of its first century, professional football was not a
long-term career option. In the early days, the Scotland
international team included “professional men” such as Dr John
Smith – a Mauchline-born GP in Kirkcaldy (who was also an original British Lion), or the Reverend William
Beveridge, a Church of Scotland minister. Why, legend has it, the
great Alan Morton only turned professional with Rangers because his
signing-on fee provided a much-needed capital boost to the family
mining interests in which Morton, a chartered mining engineer, was a
vital cog.
Sure,
while the round-ball code was more-egalitarian: Alex James, Hughie
Gallacher, Willie Shankly and Matt Busby were far from the first
players to exchange the coal face for the football field, it wasn't
until after the Second World War, that young Scots would leave school
and immediately join football clubs. And it was not until the late
1960s that footballing apprenticeships became official – before
then, the 15-year-olds joining big clubs were “ground staff boys,”
poorly-paid skivvies by and large.
Jamie Ritchie - a pioneer
Today,
nearly a quarter of a century after rugby union embraced
professionalism, we are only now seeing the first wave of young
players leaving school to go straight into careers as rugby players.
I am prepared to be corrected on this, but, as I understand it, Jamie
Ritchie was the first player to sign for a Scottish club directly
from school – when he joined Edinburgh straight out of Madras
College, as an 18-year-old, in 2014.
Of
course, Ritchie was then 18, most apprentice footballers leave school
at 16. Sadly, far-too-many of them are cast out into the cruel real
world at 18 or 19. It is to be hoped rugby will take more seriously
its duty of care to its young recruits.
I
say this because, my reading of current events is that the SRU is
preparing to mirror football even more closely. Already it is
happening, and I can see this pattern developing, whereby the bottom
line for the paid officials inside Murrayfield is just that – the
bottom line on the financial statement – the profit or loss for the
season, when, for so long, the bottom line has been the overall
health of the game.
Right
now, the SRU might be talking-up the healthy profit which Scottish
Rugby PLC delivered last season, but, the reality is, the game is
sick.
The
proposal to start Super-6 has, as we all know, been highly-divisive.
I now believe S6 just might be the future – but, as I have
maintained from the start, if this initiative does go tits-up, I
reckon it will be the fault of BT Murrayfield rather than the six
clubs.
S6
has a key role to play in seeing rugby become like football, and
become a genuine career prospect for school leavers. Although, it
will be some years, if ever, before teenagers moving from school to a
career in rugby start to make the kind of money their footballing
contemporaries enjoy.
Actually,
rugby might, in my view, be a better career prospect for youngsters,
albeit the inherent dangers of such a contact sport. For a start,
footballers tend to leave school at 16, with minimum qualifications,
to join their clubs. Rugby players tend to move from schools to clubs
at 18, after taking Standard Grades and Highers. Also, one of the
backstops which has been put on the S6 franchises is the need for the
franchise-winning clubs to have a tie-in with a higher education
establishment, such as a university or college. This should ensure
the young players are receiving an education in more than rugby, to
enhance the value of those Standard Grades and Highers.
I
daresay, there will be others, like Ritchie, who go straight from
school to full-time rugby, but, for most potential professionals, the
route map I can see is:
- club or school mini, then midi rugby
- shining in the SRU Youth Conferences, getting onto the performance pathway
- selection for the age group teams
- becoming a supported Academy player
- becoming a full-time Stage Three Academy player
- for the outstanding few – a full-time professional contract
- for the rest – a contract with an S6 club
If
the SRU and the six franchise-winning get it right, while not all the
young players in the system will make it to full-time contracts,
those who don't make the cut to this level, will be well-equipped to
enjoy a rugby career at a high level, and they ought to also have the
equipment to secure a good job away from the game.
Professional
Football has a justified bad reputation for hoovering-up young
talent, and ruthlessly spitting-out, disillusioned and too-often
unprepared for life in the “real world” those who don't make the
grade.
It
is to be hoped, the S6 clubs will take better care of the young men
put into their care by the SRU's performance department than the top
football clubs have.
Now,
as I have outlined above. The BT Murrayfield professional
administrators only have eyes for the bottom line. And, the bottom
line is – professional rugby, at the moment, is largely
unsustainable – it is not the cash generator which professional
football is. This is one of the reasons for S6 – the SRU is
expecting the six clubs to fund a level of rugby they wish to
encourage, but cannot afford to run.
So,
while S6 has a role to play in developing the next generation of
full-time professionals and internationalists – they will not be
able to sustain those players who fail to train-on, from promising
youngster, to potential professional.
These
guys will still need ordinary “amateur” clubs as a fall-back, if
they wish to continue playing. It is getting this link between the
ordinary players and the performance athletes right, which is going
to be the difficult job.


The youth development side is something which Club rugby have to get better at. A look at how few Clubs can fulfil their Conference fixtures gives us an indication of the current issues.
ReplyDeleteIn traditional rugby areas, it's maybe not so much of an issue, but then we do have the likes of Finlay Calder telling us we have too many Clubs, so some of these "traditional" Clubs and their youth sections will perhaps have to disappear when the new Super6 structures are introduced.
Do you foresee Super 6 franchise holders following the likes of Celtic who have a direct tie up with St Ninians in Kirkintilloch? Celtic have about 30 students in each year from 3rd year up (I think) who are also part of the Celtic Academy - currently, Schools of Rugby tend to be 1st & 2nd only as part of the curriculum.