Aristotle Armstrong

Aristotle Armstrong
The thrawn, alternative voice of Scottish Rugby

Thursday, 26 April 2018

Make Your Mind Up Time Is Almost Here Folks

The try line is looming for Bill Gammell and his committee

AS DEAR old Hughie Green used to say on Opportunity Knocks: “It's make your mind up time folks – which act do you want to see come back next week.” Today, however, it isn't the general public who get their say, but Sir Bill Gammell's tribunal of the great and good – who will need to tell the Ayatollah Dodson and his Murrayfield minions which six clubs will be allowed to inhabit the new, sun-kissed uplands of that land of milk and honey: Stupid 6.


With the big reveal scheduled for Tuesday, the worker bees deep in the bowels of HQ have to have everything tied-up by Monday; and, with Silver Saturday getting in the way, they don't have much time left.

Yesterday, I mentioned Ayr's small problem with Millbrae's somewhat rickety infrastructure. Now, as at least two distinguished Scottish rugby writers could tell you, my suggestion as to a way round this seemed fanciful. Indeed, one went as far as to tell me: “Nobody else would dare think that Aristotle.” But I was not alone.

Yesterday, on a Facebook thread, John McHarg - former Glasgow lock, elder brother of the esteemed “Big Al” McHarg and himself the Godfather of those capped Ayrshire locks – Brother Al, the Broon brothers, “Gulliver” Cuthbertson and the Gray brothers, distinguished coach or adviser to most of the Ayrshire clubs at one time or another – came up with the same notion as I had: Rugby Park, Kilmarnock.

Rugby at Rugby Park - why not?

OK, several of the Millbrae “Silverbacks” would have a seizure at the thought, but, consider this. One of the planks of Billy McHarg's franchise plan was to brand the Ayr bid as being a “South West District” bid, based on the Ayrshire and Dumfries and Galloway clubs involved in Bill Nolan's SWARC proposal – South West Area Rugby Clubs. Indeed, when Billy first spoke to me about Ayr bidding for a franchise, he stressed it would be as something like “Ayrshire Bulls”, rather than “Ayr”.

Ayrshire Bulls, playing at Rugby Park, with its 3G pitch and excellent corporate hospitality facilities might be a move too-far for some Millbrae stalwarts, but, on some levels – it makes sense. And, the esteemed Mr McHarg and I were not the only guys who thought this might be worthy of consideration.


THE Murrayfield “suits” are, I would suggest, somewhat troubled by this blog's persistent poo-pooing of the concept of Stupid 6. A wee bird telt me, this week's meeting of the National League 2 and 3 clubs was preceded by a Trump-style denunciation of the “Fake News” Aristotle is allegedly punting; delivered in presidential style by “Rob Who?” Our current leader – the only current President I can think of who can make The Donald look fit for purpose.

President Rob had a message for the National League 2 and 3 clubs this week

If the writings of one seventy-something semi-retired old hack can worry the High Heid Yins that much, then they clearly hae their doots aboot their new product. Or perhaps, it's: will we really get away with this?


IN MY continuing quest to give a platform to those worried rugby men whose concerns about Stupid 6 are not being met by the mainstream media's policy of turning a blind eye to this, here are some of the comments posted below the line following yesterday's blog post.

Another disgruntled club official posted:

“The capital investment required to upgrade facilities to the level required far outstrips the financial investment that the SRU are asking the clubs to commit to in terms of funding their squads.

And to be asking clubs to achieve that in a tight time-scale when they don't have the money and when things like planning are completely out of their control is ridiculous.

Clubs are being bullied into submission - time to collectively stand up and walk away!”

Clubfan posted:

“May you live in interesting times
 
I always took that to be more a curse than good wishes.

It’s the details that always get in the way.

As someone who lives in an area with several floodlit 3G pitches I can attest to the light pollution these cause.

The question is how will the clubs find the £500k required for the 3G pitch? And additional cash for floodlighting. On top of the cash required to fund their super 6 side. Tricky one that.

And what’s Sportscotlands view on all this? What largesse do they have to support 6 3G pitches and what projects (more worthy?) will be downgraded or canned to fund these?

I mean these types of problems were unknown and not foreseen before this concept kicked off.

I always had a sneaking admiration for Donald Rumsfeld and his unknown unknowns quip.”

Disgruntled Club Official posted:

“I don't know what more to add other than " I told you so " I can't see Dodson or the weak council ably led by Corporal Jones ( Flockhart) letting this stupid idea die of natural causes.

They will need to blame:
  1. The Clubs for being indecisive.
  2. The Clubs for submitting sub standard applications.
  3. The Clubs for not having suitable facilities.
  4. The Clubs for relying on the pro draft etc etc.,!
Karma is a strange thing ! If as I have previously stated stupid 6 is a non starter ! Collect your jackets at the door, walk away and let people who are committed to Club rugby take charge of Council and exercise their power of holding the board to account for their reckless actions,!

No more hiding behind the articles for Howatt and co. New broom sweeping clean!!”

I said from the moment Dodson announced Stupid 6 at the AGM, it was a nonsense. Then, when he began to flesh-out the details, it became clear, this is a blatant power grab, designed to disguise the failings of the “suits” and to give Murrayfield greater control of the leading clubs – it will do nothing for Scottish Rugby.
The proposals to start the Celtic Development League are a torpedo to the engine room of Stupid 6; the WRU's proposed Under-23 Development squads further demonstrate the SRU is applying an Elastoplast, when other similar Unions realise it is reconstructive surgery which is required.

This will all end in tears. Stop Stupid 6 now.


10 comments:

  1. But how?

    The means to change or alter this are severely limited. Speaking as a club official I would be very reluctant to be the first to put my clubs head above the parapet and wise an AGM motion in this.

    On a different tack - what’s the health of club rugby?

    I see in the OSL website a nice piece in Quins and their cup final. It goes on the describe how they have turned down promotion to the national leagues due to retirals - five players are hanging up their boots. I’m sure the rather large issue of travel to Orkney and Caithness was also a feature.

    This gets to the heart of the problem facing clubs and the SRU - we don’t have enough players to support the clubs we have and the commitment of players to give up a day to travel the length and breadth of the country is less than it was in the past.

    Play about with leagues and structures all you like. The proof will be in the pudding and this season is not a good sign for the future.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good points - which I intend addressing over the weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Club game has real problems.

    In West, Clubs voted for 12 team leagues, not so they can improve the product on the pitch, but so they can get an extra couple of home games. The belief being that this will help them bail out their failing social Clubs.

    The "fewer, but stronger" mantra isn't just about senior Clubs, it's also about youth sections. Youth sections across the region are disappearing. Some Clubs are doing this so they can directly support schools rugby, others just cause there aren't enough kids who want to play or volunteers to run them. The number of unfulfilled fixtures across the youth & schools leagues is scary.

    A strategy to develop schools rugby is solid, however the current implementation is to some degree based on the availability of Cashback funding. Unfortunately, Cashback funding has been diminishing, and the current initiatives may well run their course with the next funding round - what then for schools rugby?

    Development officers are now a rarity, whilst the SRU organised MA programme is being wrapped up.

    Pitches and clubhouses are falling into disrepair.

    Even the Womens game looks as though it is starting to struggle following a few years of growth. Last weekend Melrose Women pulled out of National 1 (with the league as good as over), whilst there's plenty of 28-0 results been put through in the league competitions.

    We need to build our game from the ground up, but the Executive and it's staff (supported by the Council), are going for the retrenchment approach of "fewer, but stronger".

    ReplyDelete
  4. pegj - spot on. More players, more teams, better clubs. That should be the mantra.

    Local issues with local solutions. End the top down diktat.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So just to add to the mayhem St Boswells have cancelled their fixture away to Highland tomorrow as they have no team.

    Highland must be very angry about this.

    Also leaves the relegation issue hanging somewhat - if St Boswells keep this up they could face ejection from the league as its not the first no show.

    ReplyDelete
  6. And there was me thinking regional rugby had trouble.

    This looks like St Boswells third non-fulfillment this season, and they still have their trip to make to Highland, as well as promotion contenders Newton Stewart.

    A quick review of Nat 3 results shows their withdrawal would impact the title race, the 2nd promotion place as well as potentially impacting who gets relegated (thanks to bonus points).

    Hawick Harlequins are supposedly rejecting promotion to Nat 3 as they don't have the strength in depth, yet I keep on hearing how schools rugby in the Borders is a model for the rest of the Scottish game. But if the schools game in the Borders is so strong, why are Clubs struggling to field teams.

    The SRU went out on a limb when they adopted a policy that kids would only be allowed to play 1 game in 48 hour period, thus forcing kids to choose between playing with a school on a Saturday or a Club on a Sunday. Could it be that the warned of implications of this policy is coming back to haunt them. Their argument is that this is a player welfare issue, but they haven't supplied evidence to back up this policy and no other Union appears to have similar concerns as they all adopt the World Rugby recommendation of a game a day.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Pegj

    There doesn’t appear to be a supposedly re Quins turning down promotion.

    From The OSL

    “The loss of so many senior players is one of the key factors behind the club’s decision to inform the SRU that they do not wish to accept promotion out of East League One and into National League Three next season.”

    ReplyDelete
  8. What's in it for Ayr to fund and run an Ayrshire district team based in Kilmarnock?

    The only bid that could realistically base itself anywhere is Glasgow Hawks as they are not a club as such. Plus, they have very little support anyway so no one is going to care too much.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ayr playing out of Rugby Park - and I honestly cannot see this happening - would, in my mind, be the only workable answer to finding an acceptable playing base, while either Millbrae or Dam Park are brought up to standard, or a new greenfield site ground is built.

    It would only be a temporary measure, but, I cannot see any alterative site in Ayrshire, ready for them to move into.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OK, got you. Not going to happen though is it. Can't imagine the Ayr membership being content to see their annual subscriptions being used to subsidise that whilst also taking away valuable bar and hospitality income.

      We both know though, that Super 6 is doomed and this is only one of the many examples why it will fail.

      Delete